Protestors beg Google not to build censored Project Dragonfly search engine

Anti-censorship demo reaches Chocolate Factory's London HQ

A small handful of protesters turned up outside Google’s London HQ today to protest against the ad company’s censored search engine, developed as part of an unholy bargain to gain access to the Chinese market.

Gloria Montgomery, director of the Tibet Society, told The Register outside Google’s King’s Cross offices: “We didn’t really inform members of the public.”

Montgomery elaborated: “Senior leadership [of Google] aren’t paying attention to global concerns. I’m not convinced it has been chopped; we’re worrying that Google is carrying on business as usual.”


Google CEO tells US Congress Chocolate Factory will unleash Dragonfly in China


The protest, which El Reg discovered a short while after its published start time, consisted of a handful of polite people standing opposite the entrance to Google’s building and peacefully holding placards.

Flyers were only handed out to those who stopped and asked for them, which Montgomery admitted was because the protestors hadn’t asked the landowner’s permission to engage in flyering. She did say, however, that Google would be “facilitating censorship as an extension of the Chinese authorities” if it went ahead with its Project Dragonfly, of which more below.

A leaflet handed out by anti-censorship protesters outside Google's London HQ

A leaflet handed out by anti-censorship protesters outside Google's London HQ today. Click to enlarge

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Google’s London HQ appears to have been built facing a privately owned plot of land, between various new-build office blocks, that otherwise looks like public open space. This is similar to how London’s City Hall is built on private land, despite appearing otherwise.

What’s Google got to do with China?

Google’s Project Dragonfly is a censored version of the Google search engine which is intended to only return results approved by China’s ruling Communist party.

China, a country whose rulers are successfully bringing to life a twisted combination of the Georgian-era wet dreams of philosopher Jeremy Bentham and the nightmarish dystopian visions of George Orwell, maintains an iron grip on information available to its subjects through the power of modern IT. It also uses technology extensively as a tool of social control.

Topics such as Tibet, democracy and the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989 are strictly off limits to people in China.

Protests against Project Dragonfly, which critics see as Google kowtowing to China’s ruthless authoritarianism in the eternal search for ever greater revenues and market share, have swirled in America ever since the once-secret search engine became public knowledge. In November last year, for example, a hundred Google employee signed a public letter condemning Google’s failure to cancel Project Dragonfly altogether.

Chief exec Sundar Pichai said at the time that “once the furore dies down” Google will be launching a censored version of its display advertising server search engine in China.

"Oh, it's about China" commented one well-fed woman who tottered past the protest in London this afternoon, busily munching from an unidentifiable pot of food. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021