Look out, kids. Your Tinder account is about to be swamped by old people... probably

Hookup app maker dishes out super-likes and $25 in cash to settle lawsuit


Young people may have better skin, but old people seemingly have better lawyers.

(And by old, we mean people over 30. Which is a good number of us vultures, admittedly. Truth hurts.)

Anyone using the Tinder dating app for the next few months may find that there is a disproportionate number of more mature lonely-hearts appearing in their screens.

That's because the app maker has agreed to dish out 50 free "super likes" to its estimated 230,000 users aged 30 and over, plus cut a $25 check and offer another 25 super-likes to any old folk that apply.

Super-likes are used by shag-seekers to woo particularly attractive netizens in this crazy 21st century cyber-courting. If you super-like someone, when they see your profile, it is highlighted in blue to let them know you're trying to get their attention. Free accounts can give one a day, paid subscribers can dish out five, and additional ones can cost 99 cents a piece.

But thanks to Tinder trying to apply the modern equivalent of Ladies Night online, the California-based biz has been forced to hand them out like dating candy to settle a lawsuit.

In its unending quest to make money from desperate and/or horny smartphone users, in 2017, Tinder added two "premium" services: Plus and Gold. If you were under 30, the Plus service costs $9.99 a month; if over 30, $10 more: $19.99. The Gold service costs another $4.99 on top of that.

Like paying Facebook for Facebook likes, the service is entirely self-referential: coughing up cash gives you expanded features within the app itself, the ability to use it across the world (the Tinder traveler) and, yes, five "super likes" a day. It turns out you can put a price on loneliness.

But this special old-person pricing did not please one Lisa Kim, who sued the app developer for age discrimination in US federal district court. And while the company's settlement [PDF] sees it admit no wrong, it's not hard to see how literally charging people of a certain age more for the same service falls foul of America's age discrimination laws.

Swipe right

She sued in April last year which led to an all-day arbitration session between Kim's class-action lawyers and the Match Group's legal beagles in November where they thrashed out an agreement.

The actual cost to Tinder-owner Match is only going to be $25 multiplied by the number of old folk who bother to apply for it. It could reach $5.75m if all estimated 230,000 users that are entitled to the payment apply, but on average only five per cent of class action users actually hear about or bother, so it will likely cost the biz less than $300,000.

The rest of the "$23 million" settlement comprises the assumed value of super-likes and one free month of the Plus/Gold service. Plus, of course, Tinder has agreed not to charge older folks more in future.

Which is good news if you're on the lookout and over 30: $25 plus one free month of the premium service, plus a year's worth of super-likes. It won't make any subsequent dates any less uncomfortable but, hey, you take what you can get, right?

There is one group who has scored though: Kim's lawyers will walk away with $1.2m in fees. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022