Funnily enough, says NetApp, when the global economy slows down, people don't buy quite as many storage arrays

Enterprise punters shut wallets amid 'deteriorating outlooks' and trade tariff blitz

The old saying goes that when America sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold. According to NetApp boss George Kurian, some large businesses are already reaching for the tissues.

To blow their noses. From a cold they've caught from America's looming economic slowdown and trade tariff war with China. Why, what were you thinking?

The exec, twin brother to Google Cloud head Thomas, made the comments on Wednesday as he outlined financials for NetApp's third quarter of its fiscal 2019, the three months to January 25. Turnover during the period was up 2 per cent year-on-year to $1.56bn, missing Wall Street estimates, and non-GAAP earnings per share were $1.20.

Profits reached $249m, contrasting strongly with the $479m loss recorded a year ago, when NetApp implemented US tax accounting changes.

He said big businesses had unexpectedly reduced levels of capacity purchases, due to the planet's economy slowing, with the "largest customers" NetApp sells to directly pulling back over the quarter.

"We saw a slowdown in purchasing across the board in January, driven by deteriorating outlooks for the global economy as well as uncertainty around trade policy. In the face of these headwinds, our largest customers became more cautious in their purchasing behaviour."

He added: "Those industries with specific exposure to China and public sector were incrementally more cautious."

NetApp's sales via the channel – circa 80 per cent of its business – fared far better; it was large direct enterprise sales that disappointed, and this was in regard to capacity purchased, not systems.

The revenue split was:

  • Products - $967m (up 2 per cent on the $952m reported a year ago)
  • Software maintenance - $239m ($221m a year ago)
  • Hardware maintenance and other services - $357m ($366m a year ago)

The hardware maintenance category let the side down but the main damage was done by insufficient product sales growth, with the US public sector looking to be one of the the culprits.

The Americas accounted for 52 per cent of the revenues, down from 53 per cent a year ago. Within that 41 per cent was commercial and 11 per cent public sector, down from 44 per cent and 14 per cent in the prior year's quarter respectively – a sudden fall. The US government shutdown probably didn't help.

The EMEA and Asia-Pacific region proportion of revenues were 33 per cent and 14 per cent respectively – the same as a year ago.

In an analyst's call Kurian went into salesman mode, as he claimed NetApp nabbed market share from rivals in the quarter, citing its all-flash array run rate of $2.4bn, up 19 per cent. Only 15 per cent of its customers run all-flash arrays so there is room to grow, he said, and this would be aided by anticipated flash price declines.

"There are a lot of weak large players in disk-based system that we will take share from, IBM, Hitachi, Fujitsu, Oracle, HPE, there's a lot of them. And even Dell has a challenged mid-range portfolio and IM portfolio. So, we feel good about our opportunities.”

Fish hook in a clear light blue tropical ocean. Photo by Shutterstock

Node your customer, right NetApp? It's only gone and hooked up MAX Data to HCI


Kurian saw no change in the competitive environment: "Our win rates stayed constant and our pipeline remains healthy." But "We do not have perfect visibility into all the reasons for purchasing slowdowns."

The bossman said his firm was looking to multi-cloud software and all-flash arrays to re-ignite growth.

The Q4 outlook is for revenues to be between $1.59bn and $1.69bn, which is level pegging with the year-ago quarter at the mid-point – no growth and a weak outlook. Why is that? Kurian's "uncertain macroeconomic environment".

El Reg might suggest NetApp was a year or more late in getting into hyperconverged infrastructure. Instead Dell EMC and Nutanix are enjoying by far the biggest share of HCI product bunce.

Kurian was asked by a questioner on the Q3 analyst earnings call: “Are you prepared at this point to provide kind of a [SolidFire stand-alone and HCI] run rate that you think is reasonable or a percentage of product revenue?”

He declined to "break it out", but promised "more as we head into fiscal '20". Says it all really. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022