ZX Spectrum Vega+ 'backer'? Nope, you're now a creditor – and should probably act fast

Speak up and you might recover some of that £513k


People who paid for one of the infamous ZX Spectrum Vega+ handheld game consoles are being urged to register themselves as creditors of the company before a liquidator is appointed.

As regular readers know, the company which was set up to produce the Vega+ consoles, Retro Computers Ltd (RCL), took £513,000 from around 4,500 members of the public to put its finished design into production. Years later, a handful of substandard consoles emerged.

Those members of the public – initially called backers by crowdfunding website Indiegogo, which funnelled money to RCL – have a financial claim upon RCL now the firm has been wound up, meaning in law they are seen as creditors. Creditors, in turn, stand a chance of getting some or even all of their initial £105 purchase price back if they get involved with the insolvency process by appointing a spokesman.

A couple of weeks ago, RCL was wound up by Private Planet Ltd. That company's sole director is Janko Mrsic-Flogel, who was brought into RCL as a director to develop new firmware for the Vega+, though he did not deliver on this and the console was eventually shipped running freeware ZX Spectrum emulator FUSE. Along with RCL MD David Levy and former PR woman Suzanne Martin, Mrsic-Flogel currently owes other former directors of RCL £38,000 in court-ordered legal costs.

Paul Andrews, another former director of RCL who has pursued the company and its current management through the courts, told The Register: "Based on emails sent to me and various other people, the official receiver has indicated backers of the ZX Vega Plus are considered as creditors in this matter due to the prior court cases."

Those cases include the one which struck down crowdfunding platform Indiegogo's terms and conditions, allowing one of RCL's customers to claim the firm breached a contract of sale it had formed with him.

On that basis, continued Andrews, RCL's customers should be able to have a say in which insolvency practitioner will liquidate RCL. "Clearly it would be inappropriate for thousands of backers to contact the official receiver themselves, but my understanding is the official receiver will acknowledge a single point of contact on the collective behalf of ZX Vega Plus backers/creditors."

That spokesman role, The Register has been told, could be filled by Graham Kenny, last seen on these pages as custodian of the Clive Help Us petition website, which he set up to try to get Sir Clive Sinclair to stop RCL defecating all over his legacy.

Kenny told El Reg by email: "We have now set up the following link which gives creditors the opportunity to have myself speak and act on their behalf as I have already done with the backers who have signed the Vega+ Refund Request Petition previously."

When we asked if Kenny was going to claim a cut of the creditors' cash or otherwise bill them for acting as their spokesman, he simply said: "Nope."

The next step in the RCL saga is for a creditors' meeting to take place, overseen by the Official Receiver. Whoever the Official Receiver allows to appoint the liquidator – normally the creditor or group of creditors with the biggest financial claim on the remaining assets of the business – tends to be the group which gets most of its money back.

People keen to see a tangible end to this sorry story and to be reimbursed for the money they handed over in good faith back in 2016 could do worse than get their voices heard within the next 10 days. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022