Another way to look at Amazon's counterfeit-busting Project Zero: Making merchants cough up protection money

It's up to you to stop fake stuff going on sale in our cyber-bazaar, says multibillion-dollar biz


Analysis Amazon is rolling out Project Zero, a system the online souk is touting to deal with the problem of counterfeit goods in its storefront.

The initiative, announced on Thursday, is supposed to help merchants police products sold through Amazon, and stop the sale of any faked clones of their gear. It may also end up helping Amazon make money from its vendors' efforts to protect their cash flow.

Project Zero, initially available only by invitation, consists of automated product scanning, a self-service counterfeit removal too, and a product serialization scheme. Merchants obtain tracking numbers from Amazon and apply them to their products and packaging, so Amazon's systems can scan items for authenticity. It builds upon the Brand Registry, for registering logos and trademarks to facilitate detection of infringement, introduced in 2017.

"We’re excited to announce Project Zero, a new program that empowers brands to help drive counterfeits to zero," said Amazon VP Dharmesh Mehta in an online post. "Project Zero combines Amazon’s advanced technology, machine learning, and innovation with the sophisticated knowledge that brands have of their own intellectual property and how best to detect counterfeits of their products."

Project Zero is unlikely to make things worse, apart from the potential expense. Amazon says the automated scanning and self-service removal tool are free to use; the product serialization scheme costs between USD$0.01 and USD$0.05 per unit, based on volume. Amazon said sellers that opt to use the paid-for serialization approach "see the best results," so go figure.

"The interesting thing about this program is it's not without cost," said Mark Schonfeld, a partner at Burns & Levinson LLP in Boston, in a phone interview with The Register. "Amazon intends to charge for these codes and to charge probably for each package that bears the code. So Project Zero is a method that Amazon proposes for stopping counterfeiting on its website, but it is also a way for Amazon to earn revenue."

Amazon for years has struggled with counterfeit products, in so much as collecting commissions as third-parties sell knockoffs through its souk can be described as a struggle. It's not clear, however, how much money Amazon has made selling fakes, if any. "There really aren't any figures to enable one to estimate the amount of counterfeit goods sold on Amazon," said Schonfeld. "The anti-counterfeiting community believes the amount is significant."

Schonfeld said he's had smaller clients who have been driven out of business by those selling imitations of their goods on Amazon.

The piracy problem

In 2016, the OECD said that the sale of counterfeit and pirated goods accounted to almost half a trillion dollars a year, or around 2.5 per cent of global imports.

In recent years, Amazon has been sued many times by aggrieved merchants, notably by William Sonoma and Daimler among others. In 2017, computing book seller NoStarch Press complained that Amazon was selling counterfeit copies of its Python for Kids title and the issue got attention for a time. But the problem hasn't gone away.

There have been a variety of lawsuits against Amazon over counterfeiting, said Schonfeld, but so far they haven't been successful. That's largely a consequence of the 2010 decision in Tiffany v. eBay, in which the jeweler sued the online auction site over counterfeits for sale and lost.

"The court rejected Tiffany's argument and held that trademark owners are responsible for policing the marketplaces," said Schonfeld. "Since then all the internet markets like Alibaba, eBay and Amazon have relied on that ruling for their defense that they're not liable for counterfeit goods. The chief requirement for internet marketplaces is they must have prompt and effective takedown procedures. If they don't have that, then they can be held liable."

chips

Fake fuse: Bloke admits selling counterfeit chips for use in B-1 bomber, other US military gear

READ MORE

Schonfeld said Amazon's takedown procedure is less effective than eBay's but the company does at some point remove counterfeit items after receiving a complaint.

Part of the reason counterfeiting has become so prevalent on Amazon's website is that third-party sellers have become more important to its business. In Q4 2018, third-party sellers accounted for 52 per cent of units sold, bringing in $13.38bn during the quarter.

"The Amazon business model has changed radically in the last five to ten years," explained Schonfeld. "It used to be Amazon was a third-party intermediary between seller and buyer, but not a seller itself, just like eBay."

But since then, he said, it has become both a seller of goods and has developed a program called Fulfillment By Amazon where the company stores third-party goods in its warehouses, collects payments, and handles shipping.

"Project Zero is being applauded by the anti-counterfeiting community," said Schonfeld. "They make it sound like it's the greatest thing ever. And indeed it may be. However it's not free." ®

Updated to add

Amazon is upset at the "insinuation" that it makes money from knockoff gear sold through its web empire. "Counterfeit damages our brand, disrupts the integrity of our store, and challenges the trust we have worked hard to earn from customers," a PR told us after publication.

"We hold bad actors accountable for returns, refunds, claims and other issues related to the sale of counterfeit goods. And because customers are always protected by our A-to-Z Guarantee, when a bad actor doesn’t pay, Amazon covers the costs."

The spokesperson also stressed that portions of Project Zero are free. However, we note that the paid-for serialization technology is the portion Amazon recommends merchants use.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading
  • Utility biz Delta-Montrose Electric Association loses billing capability and two decades of records after cyber attack

    All together now - R, A, N, S, O...

    A US utility company based in Colorado was hit by a ransomware attack in November that wiped out two decades' worth of records and knocked out billing systems that won't be restored until next week at the earliest.

    The attack was detailed by the Delta-Montrose Electric Association (DMEA) in a post on its website explaining that current customers won't be penalised for being unable to pay their bills because of the incident.

    "We are a victim of a malicious cyber security attack. In the middle of an investigation, that is as far as I’m willing to go," DMEA chief exec Alyssa Clemsen Roberts told a public board meeting, as reported by a local paper.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021