It's official! The Register is fake news… according to .uk overlord Nominet. Just a few problems with that claim, though

We translate domain registry CEO's hit piece


Analysis Nominet, which runs the .uk domain-name registry, has taken a leaf out of Donald Trump's playbook, and called our report this week into its sale of up to £100m worth of domain names "fake news."

"The Trouble with Fake News," a blog post from Nominet CEO Russell Haworth on Wednesday is titled. It begins: "Unfortunately, we’ve found it necessary to set the record straight on a Register article with some blatant inaccuracies about Nominet, our operations and our plans for releasing previously reserved second level domains. The article contains basic factual errors and assertions that are simply not credible."

But of course, as is so often the case with Trump, the goal of the post is not to actually highlight inaccuracies but to undercut accurate reporting of dubious decisions made by those in charge.

pigs

UK's internet registry prepares a £100m windfall for its board members – and everyone else will pay for it

READ MORE

In this case, significant questions remain over how and why Nominet, a non-profit organization, designed a system that directly benefits its largest members, some of whom sit on its board of directors.

We are happy to confirm that Haworth is correct in one small aspect, however: we initially reported that registrar Names.co.uk has two representatives on the Nominet board. It doesn't, it only has one. That lone error has no impact on the accuracy of our story, and we were more than happy to correct the number once we had a chance to review Haworth's blog post. Nominet did not contact The Reg to complain or request a correction, nor let us know it was responding or had responded to our coverage with a public statement.

To recap: Nominet will add roughly three million "unclaimed" .uk domain names to the internet next month but before the public can register them, it will give some of its registrars a special one-week time period during which they can grab the most valuable names and then sell them on at significant profit.

Some registrars not participating in this scheme are complaining. They claim they were not made aware of the system, and when they did find out, they were told they had already missed a registration deadline. Not only that but Nominet developed a new technical setup where registrars can buy themselves greater access to the most valuable names.

If you pay Nominet £450, a company can register six domains per minute, but if you pay it £90,000 upfront, you can register 150 per minute (there are two other tiers at £4,500 and £45,000). That is a clear structural effort to give larger companies greater access to valuable internet real estate. In addition, to make it work, Nominet developed and introduced an entirely new system that sits on top of its existing, more equitable technique that is used to register and renew millions of domains every year.

Conflict of interests

We pointed out that three of the companies that will benefit most from this approach have representatives that sit on Nominet's board: James Bladel is vice president of global policy for the world's largest registrar, US-based GoDaddy; Volker Greimann is the general counsel of German registrar Key-Systems; and Kelly Salter is domain development manager of Namesco Limited, which is owned by the Dada Group.

We also pointed out that 37 smaller registrars had complained directly to the Nominet board about this approach, alleging the entire process "was not communicated appropriately and not open long enough" and that some of them had been "refused access even though the release isn’t until July 2019."

Those companies also noted that the pay-to-play part of the system had not been communicated to them and was "disproportionately unfair to our business models." Domains worth millions of pounds, many belonging to household names, would be added to the internet despite the general public and brand owners being unaware of the program.

The letter referenced two brands – Asda and Audi – whose domains were due to be touted. Asda immediately registered Asda.uk whereas Audi has still not noticed. We pointed that many other brand names will be impacted: Mars.uk, Heinz.uk, Maltesers.uk, Colgate.uk, and Lipton.uk.

There are many more: Gillette.uk, Instagram.uk, FedEx.uk, Samsung.uk, Pampers.uk, Huawei.uk, Toyota.uk, Honda.uk – to name but a few. Every one of these world-famous brand names risks having their name picked up for a few dollars by Nominet registrars and then sold on at inflated prices. And the larger the Nominet registrar, and the more money it pays Nominet upfront, the more likely it is to get hold of the domain.

Amazingly, while decrying our article as "fake news," Nominet's CEO confirmed all of the most concerning aspects of the system. But first he took issue with the fact that the registry and in particular its board members can expect to benefit significantly from the system:

The notion that Board members, whoever they are, would be able to construct a system that works for their own benefit is risible. As with any professionally run Board, conflicts are managed appropriately. In this case, the elected members had potential conflicts, and therefore were not involved in the design of the system we decided upon.

But Nominet stopped publishing minutes of its board meetings and conflict of interest statements from its directors in 2017 – something we wrote about both at the time and again in our article this week.

So we have no way of knowing whether what Nominet says is true – and it refuses to provide any evidence that that is the case. In fact, it consciously and actively removed the very transparency and accountability mechanisms that would provide this sort of proof.

In any event, some of the businesses connected to our elected Board members are not even signed up to take part. We would have made this clear if asked.

We did in fact ask Nominet whether the three large registrars represented on its board – GoDaddy, Key-Systems and Names.co.uk – were registered to grab the new names. And in a second email we asked at what level they had registered – were they paying the maximum £90,000 to get as much access as possible? Nominet did not respond and still has not responded.

When Haworth says "some of the businesses connected to our elected Board members are not even signed up to take part" he presumably means the single-person consultancy Name Account represented by David Thornton, who has since confirmed on Twitter that has not signed up to the process.

Presumably that means that the three companies at the heart of people's concerns are in fact a part of the process, and stand to gain millions of pounds from the system to which they had inside knowledge and were in a significant position to influence.

Nominet's CEO goes on:

The article asserts the system was a closed shop, open only to the chosen few. This is nonsense. It was open to ALL registrars, regardless of size or business model. Over 800 – of all shapes and sizes – have signed up to participate. They need to use our main EPP system; we acknowledge this a challenge for some but the code to do so is publicly available.

We did not, in fact, assert any such thing. We reported that smaller registrars had written to complain they had been excluded. And Nominet has so far refused to provide any stats on who has signed up to the process and at what tier. It has also refused to extend the "deadline" for companies unaware of the process, or to revisit its pay-to-play access system.

The extra code that companies need to access the system was provided by a Nominet member to others as a courtesy; Nominet did not provide its own members with the necessary additional code to access its own system.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Everything you wanted to know about modern network congestion control but were perhaps too afraid to ask

    In which a little unfairness can be quite beneficial

    Systems Approach It’s hard not to be amazed by the amount of active research on congestion control over the past 30-plus years. From theory to practice, and with more than its fair share of flame wars, the question of how to manage congestion in the network is a technical challenge that resists an optimal solution while offering countless options for incremental improvement.

    This seems like a good time to take stock of where we are, and ask ourselves what might happen next.

    Congestion control is fundamentally an issue of resource allocation — trying to meet the competing demands that applications have for resources (in a network, these are primarily link bandwidth and router buffers), which ultimately reduces to deciding when to say no and to whom. The best framing of the problem I know traces back to a paper [PDF] by Frank Kelly in 1997, when he characterized congestion control as “a distributed algorithm to share network resources among competing sources, where the goal is to choose source rate so as to maximize aggregate source utility subject to capacity constraints.”

    Continue reading
  • How business makes streaming faster and cheaper with CDN and HESP support

    Ensure a high video streaming transmission rate

    Paid Post Here is everything about how the HESP integration helps CDN and the streaming platform by G-Core Labs ensure a high video streaming transmission rate for e-sports and gaming, efficient scalability for e-learning and telemedicine and high quality and minimum latencies for online streams, media and TV broadcasters.

    HESP (High Efficiency Stream Protocol) is a brand new adaptive video streaming protocol. It allows delivery of content with latencies of up to 2 seconds without compromising video quality and broadcasting stability. Unlike comparable solutions, this protocol requires less bandwidth for streaming, which allows businesses to save a lot of money on delivery of content to a large audience.

    Since HESP is based on HTTP, it is suitable for video transmission over CDNs. G-Core Labs was among the world’s first companies to have embedded this protocol in its CDN. With 120 points of presence across 5 continents and over 6,000 peer-to-peer partners, this allows a service provider to deliver videos to millions of viewers, to any devices, anywhere in the world without compromising even 8K video quality. And all this comes at a minimum streaming cost.

    Continue reading
  • Cisco deprecates Microsoft management integrations for UCS servers

    Working on Azure integration – but not there yet

    Cisco has deprecated support for some third-party management integrations for its UCS servers, and emerged unable to play nice with Microsoft's most recent offerings.

    Late last week the server contender slipped out an end-of-life notice [PDF] for integrations with Microsoft System Center's Configuration Manager, Operations Manager, and Virtual Machine Manager. Support for plugins to VMware vCenter Orchestrator and vRealize Orchestrator have also been taken out behind an empty rack with a shotgun.

    The Register inquired about the deprecations, and has good news and bad news.

    Continue reading
  • Protonmail celebrates Swiss court victory exempting it from telco data retention laws

    Doesn't stop local courts' surveillance orders, though

    Encrypted email provider Protonmail has hailed a recent Swiss legal ruling as a "victory for privacy," after winning a lawsuit that sees it exempted from data retention laws in the mountainous realm.

    Referring to a previous ruling that exempted instant messaging services from data capture and storage laws, the Protonmail team said this week: "Together, these two rulings are a victory for privacy in Switzerland as many Swiss companies are now exempted from handing over certain user information in response to Swiss legal orders."

    Switzerland's Federal Administrative Court ruled on October 22 that email providers in Switzerland are not considered telecommunications providers under Swiss law, thereby removing them from the scope of data retention requirements imposed on telcos.

    Continue reading
  • Japan picks AWS and Google for first gov cloud push

    Local players passed over for Digital Agency’s first project

    Japan's Digital Agency has picked Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud for its first big reform push.

    The Agency started operations in September 2021, years after efforts like the UK's Government Digital Service (GDS) or Australia's Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). The body was a signature reform initiated by Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, who spent his year-long stint in the top job trying to curb Japan's reliance on paper documents, manual processes, and faxes. Japan's many government agencies also operated their websites independently of each other, most with their own design and interface.

    The new Agency therefore has a remit to "cut across all ministries" and "provide services that are driven not toward ministries, agency, laws, or systems, but toward users and to improve user-experience".

    Continue reading
  • Singaporean minister touts internet 'kill switch' that finds kids reading net nasties and cuts 'em off ASAP

    Fancies a real-time crowdsourced content rating scheme too

    A Minister in the Singapore government has suggested the creation of an internet kill switch that would prevent minors from reading questionable material online – perhaps using ratings of content created in real time by crowdsourced contributors.

    "The post-COVID world will bring new challenges globally, including to us in the security arena," said Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen at a Tuesday ceremony to award the city-state's 2021 Defense Technology Prize.

    "For operations, the SAF (Singapore Armed Force) has to expand its capabilities in the digital domain. Whether for administrative or operational purposes, I think that we will need to leverage technology to the maximum," he declared.

    Continue reading
  • China Telecom booted out of USA as Feds worry it could disrupt or spy on local networks

    FCC urges more action against Huawei and DJI, too

    The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has terminated China Telecom's authority to provide communications services in the USA.

    In its announcement of the termination, the government agency explained the decision is necessary because the national security environment has changed in the years since 2002. That was when China Telecom was first allowed to operate in the USA.

    The FCC now believes – partly based on classified advice from national security agencies – that China Telecom can "access, store, disrupt, and/or misroute US communications, which in turn allow them to engage in espionage and other harmful activities against the United States." And because China Telecom is state-controlled, China's government can compel the carrier to act as it sees fit, without judicial review or oversight.

    Continue reading
  • Qualcomm gets news of modest Snapdragons out of the way before next month's big chip launch

    A little more oomph coming for cheaper smartphones

    Budget smartphones these days do OK with 5G though lack performance in other areas, and so Qualcomm has promised some system-on-chips to give these modest devices some more oomph.

    The processors, announced on Tuesday for entry and mid-range 5G smartphones, also clears the deck for big chip announcements Qualcomm is expected to make at its Snapdragon Tech Summit starting at the end of next month.

    The 6nm Snapdragon 695 5G, unveiled this week, is a successor to the 8nm 690 5G used in the OnePlus Nord N10 5G, which is priced under $300, and various other handhelds.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021