Tesla driver killed after smashing into truck had just enabled Autopilot – US crash watchdog

Flash automaker insists victim 'immediately removed his hands from the wheel'


In a preliminary report issued on Thursday, the US National Transportation Safety Board on said that a Tesla 3 crash on March 1 in Delray Beach, Florida, occurred while the vehicle's Autopilot system was active.

"The driver engaged the Autopilot about 10 seconds before the collision," the report stated. "From less than 8 seconds before the crash to the time of impact, the vehicle did not detect the driver’s hands on the steering wheel. Preliminary vehicle data show that the Tesla was traveling about 68 mph when it struck the semitrailer. Neither the preliminary data nor the videos indicate that the driver or [Autopilot] executed evasive maneuvers."

In other words, the car drove straight into the First Fleet semitrailer crossing the highway, which perhaps should have yielded as it didn't have right of way. The Tesla's roof was torn off, and it appeared neither the human driver nor the AI-powered Autopilot were paying any attention at the time. The report, we note, doesn't assign blame to anyone in particular.

The accident is the third fatal crash in America where Autopilot is confirmed to have been active. The first was in Williston, Florida, on May 7, 2016 and the situation was similar – a Tesla Model S drove into truck without driver or system intervention. The second was on March 23, 2018 in Mountain View, California, involving a Tesla Model X; a lawsuit filed against Tesla by the family of the victim of that crash alleging Autopilot defects was announced earlier this month. There have also been accidents where Autopilot has been active that did not lead to any deaths.

"Shortly following the accident, we informed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board that the vehicle’s logs showed that Autopilot was first engaged by the driver just 10 seconds prior to the accident, and then the driver immediately removed his hands from the wheel," a Tesla spokesperson told The Register in an emailed statement. "Autopilot had not been used at any other time during that drive. We are deeply saddened by this accident and our thoughts are with everyone affected by this tragedy."

tesla_model_s

FYI: You could make Tesla's Autopilot swerve into traffic with a few stickers on the road

READ MORE

The NTSB, an independent government agency that investigates accidents, and the NHTSA, a part of the Department of Transportation that regulates vehicles and has the power to demand a recall, are both looking into the Delray Beach crash.

Tesla's spokesperson said drivers of the automaker's cars have driven more than a billion miles with Autopilot engaged. "Our data shows that, when used properly by an attentive driver who is prepared to take control at all times, drivers supported by Autopilot are safer than those operating without assistance," the spinner said. "For the past three quarters we have released quarterly safety data directly from our vehicles which demonstrates that.”

For all those miles driven, Autopilot, a form of super-cruise-control, is far from perfect. A research paper released earlier this year by MIT scientists studying Tesla's driving-assistance system found that in the context of "tricky situations" – scenarios that may lead to property damage, injury or death – drivers disengaged Autopilot on average every 9.2 miles. Yet rather than pushing for perfection, the paper argues that the system's imperfections may be what keeps drivers attentive. Drivers are supposed to keep their hands on the wheel, and remain prepared to take control, at all times when Autopilot is engaged.

The question now for Tesla and its customers is whether the potential consequences of flaws outweigh the alleged benefits.

Critics of the company's self-driving software contend that Tesla's means of assessing whether drivers have their hands on the steering wheel – as advised when Autopilot is active – is inadequate because it only measures torque – force applied by the driver to turn the wheel. Therefore, they suggest it's not necessarily correct that the driver removed his hands from the wheel 10 ten seconds before the accident. It may be that the driver was holding the wheel but not turning it.

The Register asked Tesla whether it has any data to indicate that the driver's hands had left the wheel beyond making that inference from the lack of steering wheel torque. The Elon Musk-run automaker has yet to respond.

In a statement made to The Washington Post, David Friedman, VP of advocacy for consumer reports who served as the acting head of NHTSA in 2014, criticized Tesla's assistive driving tech for its inability to detect an 18-wheel truck on the highway and suggested the company's approach to sensing driver attention is inadequate.

“Tesla has for too long been using human drivers as guinea pigs," he said. "This is tragically what happens." ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • India reveals home-grown server that won't worry the leading edge

    And a National Blockchain Strategy that calls for gov to host BaaS

    India's government has revealed a home-grown server design that is unlikely to threaten the pacesetters of high tech, but (it hopes) will attract domestic buyers and manufacturers and help to kickstart the nation's hardware industry.

    The "Rudra" design is a two-socket server that can run Intel's Cascade Lake Xeons. The machines are offered in 1U or 2U form factors, each at half-width. A pair of GPUs can be equipped, as can DDR4 RAM.

    Cascade Lake emerged in 2019 and has since been superseded by the Ice Lake architecture launched in April 2021. Indian authorities know Rudra is off the pace, and said a new design capable of supporting four GPUs is already in the works with a reveal planned for June 2022.

    Continue reading
  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021