What do our IT pro readers make of virtualization in 2019? Here are the poll results, plus our insight and tips

Download 'The Economics of Application Platforms' for free today

Got Tips?

Sponsored If you dig back through El Reg's archives to 2007 and 2008, you'll find a lot of coverage of how x86 virtualisation was changing the world. The name of the game was server consolidation, and IT teams were waking up to both the cost-saving benefits and the prospect of eliminating a lot of server admin drudgery.

VMware was on the rise, and Microsoft was just entering the fray, while Citrix and others were jostling for position.

Over the following few years, server virtualization moved from a promising new idea to accepted mainstream technology, and IT organisations got on with cleaning up their x86 server sprawl. A lot of the systems put in place back then still exist in one form or another, as do the practices that grew up around them.

Even where upgrades and growth have taken place, the consolidation mindset, with which many old VMware and Hyper-V environments were conceived, still defines their spirit and the way they operate. The "discrete-fixed-stack-per-application" philosophy is alive and well in these systems.

None of this matters that much if you are supporting a stable set of legacy applications with predictable resource needs. Granted you might get irritated by some software vendors stinging you for excessive licence fees as they continue to penalise customers who virtualize in many scenarios, but on the whole, you're generally not held back in any significant way.

Reader poll results

According to a recent Register reader survey, however, problems arise when you attempt to build on these past investments to create an environment suitable for running more dynamic workloads. We're talking about unpredictable, fast-growing or (potentially) hyper-scale applications, and/or those requiring secure distributed access.

Cloud infrastructure and platform services from the likes of Amazon, Microsoft, and Google come into their own here, but you don't always want to run stuff on other people's servers – our survey's respondents were very vocal on this. Many of you, therefore, highlight a need for cloud-style application delivery but with systems deployed on your own infrastructure.

The question is whether you should extend the scope of the above-mentioned older virtualisation environments, or start afresh with a platform specifically designed to create private clouds or support hybrid deployment models. The consensus is that in most cases, starting afresh is the way to go for a couple of main reasons.

cloud consumption

AWS shucks: Nutanix dives into hybrid cloud, mines for secondary data gold


Firstly, the existing technology stack you have in place is likely to need add-ons and extensions in order to deal with the management and orchestration needs of more dynamic applications, and these can be expensive. Secondly, getting the most from modern private/hybrid cloud platforms requires a mindset shift and the adoption of new ways of working, both of which can be easier if you aren't fighting against existing systems and processes that were designed around more static requirements.

As a simple example, if your organisation is moving more towards agile, devops, and continuous delivery, something like self-service provisioning of resources by development and application teams, while maintaining operational integrity, is a key requirement. So too is the ability to move workloads around with ease, for example, as demands change over the lifetime of a modern "digital" application.

Against this background, we couldn't help contemplating that it's time to start thinking about all of those 10-year-old virtualization environments as legacy.

The overriding conclusion from our reader research is that there's a lot to consider when it comes to implementing on-prem platforms capable of supporting today's more dynamic application and workload needs, though established vendors often put their own interests ahead of yours when providing guidance and solutions.

It can be better for incumbent vendors to encourage you to build on existing investments because selling add-ons is good for (their) business, and it keeps you "in the fold" as a loyal or captive customer. The last thing they want to propose is a fresh start, as this might prompt you to then look around at other options.

Show me the money

If you are interested in some insights and tips on how to navigate this minefield, you'll find lots to help in our reader-led research report, titled "The Economics of Application Platforms." This is sponsored by Nutanix, and is available as a free download right here.


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020