IEEE says it may have gone about things the wrong Huawei, lifts ban after US govt clearance

Academic outfit U-turns on blacklisting Chinese bogeyman

The US-based Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) has lifted its sanctions on Huawei-linked academic reviewers.

In an email sent to members, seen by The Register, IEEE president Jose Moura declared the organisation's recent ban on Huawei-linked people peer-reviewing academic papers is over, pleading for the "patience of our members and volunteers" over the last week of pointed criticism from academics and the media.

That criticism all began with El Reg's report of the impact of IEEE sanctions on the academic community, with the sanctions having triggered a backlash from East and West alike.

Bizarrely, the wording of the original IEEE ban also included no IEEE-branded merchandise being sold to Huawei-linked people – including, of all things, coffee mugs.

Man being kicked by oversized leg with city in background

You go that way, we'll go Huawei: China Computer Federation kicks back at IEEE in tit-for-tat spat


In his email to the IEEE membership, Moura said, among other things:

We acted promptly because we wanted to protect our volunteers and members from potential legal risk that could have involved significant penalties. As a non-political, not-for-profit organization registered in New York, IEEE must comply with its legal obligations under the laws of the United States and other jurisdictions. We also engaged the US government to seek clarification on the extent to which these export control restrictions were applicable to IEEE activities.

I am pleased to report that this engagement was successful and we have revised our guidance to remove any restriction on the participation of the employees of these companies as editors or peer reviewers in the IEEE publication process. To reemphasize, all IEEE members can continue to participate in the open and public activities of the IEEE, including our scientific and technical publications.

This was a strong response to the concerns of academics and technological researchers concerned that even as non-US citizens in non-US countries, they were effectively being held to obey US law. Professor Alan Woodward of the University of Surrey previously told El Reg that the sanctions would "cause a big problem" by shutting out leading Chinese 5G experts from sharing their knowledge with the English-speaking world.

A US government Q&A (PDF, 15 pages) about the sanctions, which are part of US president Donald Trump's trade war against China and issued before the IEEE's U-turn, tends to suggest that academia was largely exempt from the restrictions anyway. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Beijing probes security at academic journal database
    It's easy to see why – the question is, why now?

    China's internet regulator has launched an investigation into the security regime protecting academic journal database China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), citing national security concerns.

    In its announcement of the investigation, the China Cyberspace Administration (CAC) said:

    Continue reading
  • Xi Jinping himself weighs in on how Big Tech should deploy FinTech
    Beijing also outlines its GovTech vision and gets very excited about data

    China's government has outlined its vision for digital services, expected behavior standards at China's big tech companies, and how China will put data to work everywhere – with president Xi Jinping putting his imprimatur to some of the policies.

    Xi's remarks were made in his role as director of China’s Central Comprehensively Deepening Reforms Commission, which met earlier this week. The subsequent communiqué states that at the meeting Xi called for "financial technology platform enterprises to return to their core business" and "support platform enterprises in playing a bigger role in serving the real economy and smoothing positive interplay between domestic and international economic flows."

    The remarks outline an attempt to balance Big Tech's desire to create disruptive financial products that challenge monopolies, against efforts to ensure that only licensed and regulated entities offer financial services.

    Continue reading
  • China is trolling rare-earth miners online and the Pentagon isn't happy
    Beijing-linked Dragonbridge flames biz building Texas plant for Uncle Sam

    The US Department of Defense said it's investigating Chinese disinformation campaigns against rare earth mining and processing companies — including one targeting Lynas Rare Earths, which has a $30 million contract with the Pentagon to build a plant in Texas.

    Earlier today, Mandiant published research that analyzed a Beijing-linked influence operation, dubbed Dragonbridge, that used thousands of fake accounts across dozens of social media platforms, including Facebook, TikTok and Twitter, to spread misinformation about rare earth companies seeking to expand production in the US to the detriment of China, which wants to maintain its global dominance in that industry. 

    "The Department of Defense is aware of the recent disinformation campaign, first reported by Mandiant, against Lynas Rare Earth Ltd., a rare earth element firm seeking to establish production capacity in the United States and partner nations, as well as other rare earth mining companies," according to a statement by Uncle Sam. "The department has engaged the relevant interagency stakeholders and partner nations to assist in reviewing the matter.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022