Apple: Ok, ok, we'll stop listening in on your Siri conversations. For now, but maybe in the future

Just don't ask us to stop recording and storing them, says tech privacy leader

Apple has hit pause on contractors listening into and making notes on recordings of people using its Siri digital assistant after the secretive practice was exposed.

Cook & Co has tried to differentiate itself from the rest of the tech industry by stressing its privacy credentials, but it has notably not ended the Siri listening program, saying only that it won't start it up again until it has "reviewed" the current system.

Apple will also not stop recording or storing the voice interactions that its millions of users have with the digital assistant. But Apple has said it will, in the future, provide the optionfor users to opt out of the system where contractors across the world are allowed to listen in to Siri recordings in order to "grade" them.

It's not clear whether users will have to actively opt-out of that process or if Apple will default to not listening to people's requests. Probably the former.

The grading process is used by Apple to figure out if the Siri response was useful, whether the request itself was something Siri should be expected to answer, and, critically, whether the recording should have happened in the first place or was accidental.

A series of media reports into what companies like Amazon, Google and Apple are doing with the recordings of users interacting with their respective Alexa, Google Home and Siri services, has put the tech companies in a privacy spotlight.

They have all been less than transparent about what actually happens with recordings with third-party contractors revealing that they regularly listen to people in their homes doing stuff that clearly isn't expect to be recorded, including arguing, carrying out business deals, talking to their doctor about medical issues, and having sex.

They're all at it

Earlier today, Google agreed to stop listening in to recordings made through its Google Home device – in Europe - after the German authorities launched an investigation into the practice to see if it violated European privacy rules. Germany's data protection commissioner ordered the online giant to stop manual reviews for three months.

Google and Amazon are also being sued in the United States for what the lawsuits claim is illegal recording of minors through these services.

German privacy probe orders Google to stop listening in on voice recordings for 3 months


When it comes to Siri and Apple's contractors listening in, the company said in a statement: "While we conduct a thorough review, we are suspending Siri grading globally. Additionally, as part of a future software update, users will have the ability to choose to participate in grading."

What is legal and illegal, reasonable and unreasonable is not a settled issue, although it is notable that all the US tech giants have used that uncertainly to do the most they can. This includes both listening in to and transcribing recordings, even when they are certain that it resulted from an "accidental" recording when the user did not intend to be listening to and the device misheard its "wake word."

Despite knowing that many of these recordings should never have occurred, the tech companies have not deleted them, and have continued to store and transcribe their contents, presumably in the hope of improving the systems. Privacy advocates are furious.

According to some of the third party contractors that spoke anonymously with reporters, when it comes to Apple's system, the Apple Watch is the greatest producer of bad recordings. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Apple’s M2 chip isn’t a slam dunk, but it does point to the future
    The chip’s GPU and neural engine could overshadow Apple’s concession on CPU performance

    Analysis For all the pomp and circumstance surrounding Apple's move to homegrown silicon for Macs, the tech giant has admitted that the new M2 chip isn't quite the slam dunk that its predecessor was when compared to the latest from Apple's former CPU supplier, Intel.

    During its WWDC 2022 keynote Monday, Apple focused its high-level sales pitch for the M2 on claims that the chip is much more power efficient than Intel's latest laptop CPUs. But while doing so, the iPhone maker admitted that Intel has it beat, at least for now, when it comes to CPU performance.

    Apple laid this out clearly during the presentation when Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, said the M2's eight-core CPU will provide 87 percent of the peak performance of Intel's 12-core Core i7-1260P while using just a quarter of the rival chip's power.

    Continue reading
  • Workers win vote to form first-ever US Apple Store union
    Results set to be ratified by labor board by end of the week

    Workers at an Apple Store in Towson, Maryland have voted to form a union, making them the first of the iGiant's retail staff to do so in the United States.

    Out of 110 eligible voters, 65 employees voted in support of unionization versus 33 who voted against it. The organizing committee, known as the Coalition of Organized Retail Employees (CORE), has now filed to certify the results with America's National Labor Relations Board. Members joining this first-ever US Apple Store union will be represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM).

    "I applaud the courage displayed by CORE members at the Apple store in Towson for achieving this historic victory," IAM's international president Robert Martinez Jr said in a statement on Saturday. "They made a huge sacrifice for thousands of Apple employees across the nation who had all eyes on this election."

    Continue reading
  • Brave roasts DuckDuckGo over Bing privacy exception
    Search biz hits back at 'misleading' claims, saga lifts lid on Microsoft's web tracking advice

    Brave CEO Brendan Eich took aim at rival DuckDuckGo on Wednesday by challenging the web search engine's efforts to brush off revelations that its Android, iOS, and macOS browsers gave, to a degree, Microsoft Bing and LinkedIn trackers a pass versus other trackers.

    Eich drew attention to one of DuckDuckGo's defenses for exempting Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains, a condition of its search contract with Microsoft: that its browsers blocked third-party cookies anyway.

    "For non-search tracker blocking (e.g. in our browser), we block most third-party trackers," explained DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg last month. "Unfortunately our Microsoft search syndication agreement prevents us from doing more to Microsoft-owned properties. However, we have been continually pushing and expect to be doing more soon."

    Continue reading
  • UK competition watchdog seeks to make mobile browsers, cloud gaming and payments more competitive
    Investigation could help end WebKit monoculture on iOS devices

    The United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Friday said it intends to launch an investigation of Apple's and Google's market power with respect to mobile browsers and cloud gaming, and to take enforcement action against Google for its app store payment practices.

    "When it comes to how people use mobile phones, Apple and Google hold all the cards," said Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, in a statement. "As good as many of their services and products are, their strong grip on mobile ecosystems allows them to shut out competitors, holding back the British tech sector and limiting choice."

    The decision to open a formal investigation follows the CMA's year-long study of the mobile ecosystem. The competition watchdog's findings have been published in a report that concludes Apple and Google have a duopoly that limits competition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022