Clutching at its Perl 6, developer community ponders language name with less baggage

First Gim, er, Glimpse – now our web vultures' favorite coding lingo

Earlier this month, Elizabeth Mattijsen, a Dutch software developer and contributor to the open-source Perl programming language, opened an issue in the GitHub Perl 6 repository seeking to rename the project because having "Perl" in the name is "confusing and irritating."

To understand why that's so, it's necessary to know a bit about Perl's history. The first version of Perl was created by Larry Wall, who released it in late 1987 as a Unix scripting language. Over the years, subsequent versions have been released, with Perl 5 appearing in 1994. Perl 6 planning began in 2000 and its first release came toward the end of 2015.

Perl 5 is still in use today, though it exists alongside Perl 6, which isn't a successor so much as a splinter group, which included Wall. As puts it, Perl 6 is "not intended as a replacement for Perl 5, but as its own thing."

Just as Python 3 differs from Python 2, Perl 6 differs from Perl 5, with an added complication: not everyone recognizes the legitimacy of the new heir or believes the Perl fiefdom has a future. Some Perl devs describe Perl 6 as a different, though related, programming language to Perl 5. And that's Mattijsen's concern.

"Having two programming languages that are sufficiently different to not be source compatible, but only differ in what many perceive to be a version number, is hurting the image of both Perl 5 and Perl 6 in the world," she wrote. "Since the word 'Perl' is still perceived as 'Perl 5' in the world, it only seems fair that 'Perl 6' changes its name."

Her preference would be to rename it "the Camelia Programming Language," Camelia being the name of the butterfly character that presently adorns the Perl 6 website.

Another Perl developer, Damian Conway, has argued in favor of "Raku," in reference to the Rakudo Perl 6 compiler.

In a blog post published Wednesday, Curtis "Ovid" Poe, an author of modules in the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network (CPAN), Perl's module registry, and a Perl instructional book, among other things, said disagreement over the proposed name change has divided the Perl community. But it's an issue that needs to be addressed, he suggests, because "Perl" has become a hate magnet.

"Routinely I see in numerous online discussions that people refuse to even consider Perl 6 because they hate Perl," he said.

Given that software developers are capable of vehement disagreement over whether tabs or spaces should be used for source code indentation, it's perhaps not surprising that Perl evokes strong reactions. (We should note that The Register runs on Perl.)

As we reported in 2017, and was cited in the discussion of Mattijsen's proposal, Perl is the most hated programming language. That stat came from a StackOverflow developer survey and our reader poll at the time echoed those results. Our poll was not a runway victory for Perl by any means – Java and Visual Basic came in a close second and third respectively in hate metrics – but it made StackOverflow's conclusions harder to dismiss.


Official: Perl the most hated programming language, say devs


The sentiment surrounding Perl appears not to be much different today. In July, the TIOBE Index of programming language popularity said that Perl's popularity was at an all-time low. And a year-and-a-half ago, consultancy RedMonk remarked on "the rapid decline in Perl."

Poe, in a comment on the issues post, urged the Perl community to act quickly.

"So long as 'Perl 6' has Perl in its name, the rancor will continue inside the Perl community, the confusion will continue outside the Perl community, and everyone is going to suffer for it," he said. "There is only one question really left to ask, and it's not a question we're willing to face: is it too late? I don't believe it is, but if we drag our feet forever, it may be."

The Java EE community, denied the use of Oracle's Java trademark, made the leap and reinvented itself as Jakarta EE. Perhaps Perl 6 can survive its own brand metamorphosis. It doesn't appear to have much of a choice. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022