Rolling in DoH: Chrome 78 to experiment with DNS-over-HTTPS – hot on the heels of Firefox

Google promises it won't override your choice of DNS provider

Only days after Mozilla said it plans to make DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) available by default gradually for Firefox users in the US, Google announced its intention to test DoH in Chrome 78, due for beta release in the next two weeks.

DoH wraps domain-name queries in a secure, encrypted HTTPS connection to a DNS server, rather than firing off requests using bog-standard plain-text insecure DNS, thereby keeping queries inaccessible to eavesdroppers. It's one of several emerging internet protocols intended to close security and privacy gaps in online communications.

Google's experiment will involve checking whether Chrome 78 users' DNS provider is among six services selected for their readiness to test DoH – Cleanbrowsing, Cloudflare, DNS.SB, Google, OpenDNS and Quad9. And if so, Chrome will switch from standard DNS to DoH using the same service provider, at least for those lucky few in the experimental group.

Google is thus avoiding one of the concerns raised by Mozilla's approach, forcing Firefox users to change their chosen DNS provider for Cloudflare. In so doing, the Chocolate Factory ensures that malware screening and parental filtering capabilities offered by DNS providers will continue to function, if possible under DoH.

"This experiment will be done in collaboration with DNS providers who already support DoH, with the goal of improving our mutual users’ security and privacy by upgrading them to the DoH version of their current DNS service," explained Kenji Baheux, Chrome product manager, in a blog post. "With our approach, the DNS service used will not change, only the protocol will."

Baheux says Google's goal is to validate its DoH implementation in Chrome and to measure the protocol's effect on performance.

The experiment will involve a small percentage of Chrome users across supported platforms except for Linux and iOS. And there will be a way to opt-out: disabling the flag setting at chrome://flags/#dns-over-https. Most managed Chrome deployments for enterprise customers will be excluded from the test; Google plans to publish information about DoH for network admins on its Enterprise Blog shortly.

For those using Android 9 or greater who have set a DNS-over-TLS (DoT) provider in the private DNS settings, Chrome may attempt to utilize DoH and, if that fails, fallback to the DoT setting.


Mozilla Firefox to begin slow rollout of DNS-over-HTTPS by default at the end of the month


DoH and DoT are separate standards for encrypting DNS queries. DoH relies on TLS and HTTP/2 and uses the standard HTTPS port 443 for traffic; DoT relies on TCP as the connection protocol, in conjunction with TLS encryption and authentication on its own port, 853, making it more visible on a network level and easier to block.

In a Twitter post on Monday, Paul Vixie, CEO of Farsight Security and a contributor to the design of the DNS protocol, warned that DoH limits the autonomy of network administrators.

"DoT is not the same as DoH," he wrote. "Both provide TLS-level privacy. But DoT can be blocked in network firewalls. DoH is 'designed to prevent on-path interference in DNS operations' (introduction, RFC 8484). DoT is a universal good. DoH will be a net harm no matter what good it may do."

Earlier this year, he argued that DoH is part of a campaign by US tech companies to control the DNS resolution path, at the expense of those who would prefer to set their rules for their own networks. "There's been a war for control of the DNS resolution path, since at least the SiteFinder debacle and perhaps earlier," he said. 'This is the latest battle in that long war. Big American tech companies want your DNS traffic, any way they can get it." ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021