Surprise! Copying crummy code from Stack Overflow leads to vulnerable GitHub jobs

Boffins find sharing snippets of code has a downside

Among those learning how to program, and some more experienced software developers, it's common practice to copy and paste code snippets from Stack Overflow, a Q&A forum for asking about coding problems.

There's even a faux O'Reilly-styled book of sorts, "Copying and Pasting from Stack Overflow," to highlight the practice, which turns out to be not just lazy but also a security risk.

In a research paper submitted to pre-print service ArXiv, six computer science boffins who hail from Shiraz University, Iran, Polytechnique Montreal University, Quebec, Canada, and Chamran University, Iran – Morteza Verdi, Ashkan Sami, Jafar Akhondali, Foutse Khomh, Gias Uddin, and Alireza Karami Motlagh – say that they looked at more than 72,000 C++ code snippets in 1,325 Stack Overflow posts and found 69 vulnerable snippets of 29 different types.

That's not a lot in absolute terms but those 69 vulnerable snippets show up in 2,589 GitHub projects. The researchers say they notified the authors of affected projects and some, but not all, chose to fix the flaws, which consist of known CWEs.

The paper, "An Empirical Study of C++ Vulnerabilities in Crowd-Sourced Code Examples," is being reviewed for possible publication in the journal IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

In a phone interview with The Register, Ashkan Sami, associate professor of computer science, engineering, and information technology at Shiraz University in Iran, said the research represents an attempt to look at how flawed code migrates from Stack Overflow to GitHub.

"Basically, what we tried to show is that using Stack Overflow without reviewing it carefully can lead to potential vulnerabilities inside applications," said Sami.

The research echoes an academic paper from 2017 that found 1,161 insecure code snippets posted on Stack Overflow had been copied and pasted into 1.3m Android applications available on Google Play.

The boffins relied on a Stack Overflow data set called SOTorrent data-set Version 2018-09-23. It covers posts from 2008 through 2018 and contains some duplicate code snippets.

The researchers chose to focus on C++ because it's popular, particularly for embedded, resource-constrained programs and large, distributed systems. Vulnerabilities in such systems, they contend, are likely to have a significant impact.

The most frequently found CWEs were CWE-1006 (Bad Coding Practices, CWE-754 (Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions), and CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation).


The mod firing squad: Stack Exchange embroiled in 'he said, she said, they said' row


"Stack Overflow is only about asking and answering questions and a lot of time when developers are responding to give an answer they may not be properly educated in terms of security or may assume that those asking questions will know what to do," said Gias Uddin, a computer science PhD from McGill University who's currently working in the tech industry. "But that's not a good assumption to make."

Sami voiced similar sentiments. "The people who are using Stack Overflow, they shouldn't trust it fully," he said. "It's better for programmers to do it the hard way and learn secure coding."

Even so, the researchers developed a Chrome extension to help developers be more mindful of security when copying and pasting Stack Overflow code snippets. The extension checks copied code against the CWE database and throws up an alert if the snippet is flawed. Uddin said the plan is to release it when the paper is formally published.

Uddin said he hopes this research not only improves the quality of answers at Stack Overflow but also serves to remind developers that there are flaws in code shared on social media. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022