WeWork's Meetup slaps RSVP fees on events ‒ then tells everyone not to panic amid backlash

Meeting app insists it is running a 'small payment test' after outcry over new prices

Netizens are scrambling to find or build alternatives to Meetup.com – after the event-organizing app maker indicated it would charge people $2 per-RSVP.

Previously, it didn’t cost a single cent to click the tick mark to confirm that you’d like to attend a particular free event organized via Meetup.

Earlier this month, Meetup said it would in future charge individuals two bucks each time they reserved a spot at "select" meetings.

Meanwhile, the biz said it would slash the subscription fees it charges organizers to keep their groups listed on the Meetup website and mobile app. Thus, the balance of revenue would shift, with attendees forking out rather than organizers.

The pricing for running a Meetup group varies depending on a number of factors, such as if organizers want to pay in monthly or six-month installments, and where the group is located. The usual base cost for holding meetups in Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States is $23.99 per month or $16.49 if you pay for six at a time. Those figures would be reduced to $2 a month under the new pricing plan.

However, that shake-up in costs sparked outcry, leading to the software maker swiftly insisting that these changes will be rolled out as "a limited test for a small number of groups."

“We are conducting a small payment test,” a Meetup spokesperson told The Register on Tuesday. “Currently organizers pay to manage groups and events, and we are exploring ways to reduce this cost. One of the options we are testing is to introduce a small event fee for members."

"We have not committed to any changes at this time,” they added.

Meetup, which is popular among techies arranging confabs to discuss programming and other geek stuff, did not answer our questions regarding who was affected by this so-called “small payment test.”

That backtrack in full

After the aforementioned backlash, the biz amended its official announcement of the price changes to read:

“This payment change is currently only a limited test for a small number of groups. Organizers of these select groups have the option to opt-out of this test. We will not be making any significant payment changes in the near term. We are committed to providing advance notice before any changes go into effect.”

The new payment system is designed to “distribute costs more evenly between organizers and members,” apparently. The dotcom earlier announced: "Beginning in October, members of select groups will be charged a small fee to reserve their spot at events."

Not everyone was thrilled about these changes, and some Meetup users took to social media to vent their frustrations.

Bridget Kromhout, a principal program manager at Microsoft working on the Kubernetes ecosystem, who runs a DevOps-focused group, said she was unhappy about charging admission for what should otherwise be a free event.

Others, such as Quincy Larson, who started freeCodeCamp, a non-profit that teaches budding engineers how to code, started a new project to build a free alternative platform to Meetup.

“Let's do some quick math,” Jones said. “Before, it cost a group of people $20 per month to use Meetup.com to organize their events. With this new pricing, let's assume you have a medium-sized meetup group that meets once a week and has 30 RSVPs each time. The group's total collective Meetup.com fees will now go from $20 per month to about $240.

“Oh, wait - I forgot to add that Meetup.com will still charge group organizers $2 per month on top of this. So $242. That's a 1,210 per cent increase in cost.”

Meetup was acquired by WeWork, the office-renting startup, in 2017 before WeWork fell out of grace after it failed to IPO and its CEO Adam Neumann quit, and oh yes, its phone booths may be killing you. Some people have speculated that Meetup’s new pricing experiment is a desperate plea to stay afloat while its parent company faces running out of dosh.

Unsurprisingly, the spokesperson for Meetup was pretty quiet when we quizzed them about this, declining to comment on the record. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Screencastify fixes bug that would have let rogue websites spy on webcams
    School-friendly tool still not fully protected, privacy guru warns

    Screencastify, a popular Chrome extension for capturing and sharing videos from websites, was recently found to be vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw that allowed arbitrary websites to dupe people into unknowingly activating their webcams.

    A miscreant taking advantage of this flaw could then download the resulting video from the victim's Google Drive account.

    Software developer Wladimir Palant, co-founder of ad amelioration biz Eyeo, published a blog post about his findings on Monday. He said he reported the XSS bug in February, and Screencastify's developers fixed it within a day.

    Continue reading
  • FTC urged to protect data privacy of women visiting abortion clinics
    As Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v Wade, safeguards on location info now more vital than ever

    Democrat senators have urged America's Federal Trade Commission to do something to protect the privacy of women after it emerged details of visits to abortion clinics were being sold by data brokers.

    Women's healthcare is an especially thorny issue right now after the Supreme Court voted in a leaked draft majority opinion to overturn Roe v Wade, a landmark ruling that declared women's rights to have an abortion are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

    If the nation's top judges indeed vote to strike down that 1973 decision, individual states, at least, can set their own laws governing women's reproductive rights. Thirteen states already have so-called "trigger laws" in place prohibiting abortions – mostly with exceptions in certain conditions, such as if the pregnancy or childbirth endangers the mother's life – that will go into effect if Roe v Wade is torn up. People living in those states would, in theory, have to travel to another state where abortion is legal to carry out the procedure lawfully, although laws are also planned to ban that.

    Continue reading
  • Zuckerberg sued for alleged role in Cambridge Analytica data-slurp scandal
    I can prove CEO was 'personally involved in Facebook’s failure to protect privacy', DC AG insists

    Cambridge Analytica is back to haunt Mark Zuckerberg: Washington DC's Attorney General filed a lawsuit today directly accusing the Meta CEO of personal involvement in the abuses that led to the data-slurping scandal. 

    DC AG Karl Racine filed [PDF] the civil suit on Monday morning, saying his office's investigations found ample evidence Zuck could be held responsible for that 2018 cluster-fsck. For those who've put it out of mind, UK-based Cambridge Analytica harvested tens of millions of people's info via a third-party Facebook app, revealing a – at best – somewhat slipshod handling of netizens' privacy by the US tech giant.

    That year, Racine sued Facebook, claiming the social network was well aware of the analytics firm's antics yet failed to do anything meaningful until the data harvesting was covered by mainstream media. Facebook repeatedly stymied document production attempts, Racine claimed, and the paperwork it eventually handed over painted a trail he said led directly to Zuck. 

    Continue reading
  • Florida's content-moderation law kept on ice, likely unconstitutional, court says
    So cool you're into free speech because that includes taking down misinformation

    While the US Supreme Court considers an emergency petition to reinstate a preliminary injunction against Texas' social media law HB 20, the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday partially upheld a similar injunction against Florida's social media law, SB 7072.

    Both Florida and Texas last year passed laws that impose content moderation restrictions, editorial disclosure obligations, and user-data access requirements on large online social networks. The Republican governors of both states justified the laws by claiming that social media sites have been trying to censor conservative voices, an allegation that has not been supported by evidence.

    Multiple studies addressing this issue say right-wing folk aren't being censored. They have found that social media sites try to take down or block misinformation, which researchers say is more common from right-leaning sources.

    Continue reading
  • US-APAC trade deal leaves out Taiwan, military defense not ruled out
    All fun and games until the chip factories are in the crosshairs

    US President Joe Biden has heralded an Indo-Pacific trade deal signed by several nations that do not include Taiwan. At the same time, Biden warned China that America would help defend Taiwan from attack; it is home to a critical slice of the global chip industry, after all. 

    The agreement, known as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is still in its infancy, with today's announcement enabling the United States and the other 12 participating countries to begin negotiating "rules of the road that ensure [US businesses] can compete in the Indo-Pacific," the White House said. 

    Along with America, other IPEF signatories are Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Combined, the White House said, the 13 countries participating in the IPEF make up 40 percent of the global economy. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022