Come on, you can't be serious: Now Australia mulls face-recog tech for p0rno site age checks

A whole new spin on facial recognition

Proving that satire is truly dead, the Australian government hopes to use facial recognition technology to check Aussies are over 18 before ogling online smut.

In a submission [PDF] to a formal inquiry looking at how to carry out age verification for online pornography and gambling, the Department of Home Affairs argued its nascent facial recognition system was the ideal solution.

It goes to some trouble to outline its credentials in this area: Home Affairs “provides a suite of identity matching services to help organisations verify the identity of customers,” it notes. It also “provides relevant national guidelines and technical services that can assist with age verification.”

But that’s just the hors d'oeuvre, the real meat is in the fact that the internal security department of the Australian government is “developing a Face Verification Service which matches a person’s photo against images used on one of their evidence of identity documents to help verify their identity.” And as a result “this could assist in age verification, for example by preventing a minor from using their parent’s driver licence to circumvent age verification controls.”

Or, in this context, to prevent people from accessing online pornography.

Aside from the fact that it seems unlikely that Australians would want to directly connect their actual face to a specific pornography website and have that information stored in a government database, the proposal makes for some interesting logistics.

It’s safe to say that the proposed facial recognition would frequently take place through the built-in camera of a laptop or PC, meaning that the Australian Department of Home Affairs is formally proposing that it have access to everyone’s camera – even potentially underage kids – as they watch pornography.

Screen grabbing

Which, incidentally, is the same approach used by online blackmailers who view and record the subsequent graphic interactions of porn watchers and then email the unsuspecting victim with screengrabs asking for money if they don’t want the full video posted online, as has happened to one Register hack.

But the Aussie government thinks this is a great idea. And it is – just think of all the possibilities: if you’ve got nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, right?

We can see how an extensive database of its citizens masturbating could be a powerful investigative tool in all sorts of other crimes: public exposure, sexual harassment, even child abuse investigations.

The facial contortions that typically accompany sexual activity are rarely captured effectively in traditional photographs, making it extremely difficult for the police to ID offenders. But with a national database of O faces, made possible through this innovative use of technology, the police would be given a crucial advantage in tackling sexual crimes.

It would make Australian that much safer from sex pests and the like. In fact, there is an argument to be had that every upstanding Australian citizen be required to bring themselves off in front of a government-monitored camera in order to finally crack down on this persistent stain on society. It’s a citizen's duty to crack one out for the country and have it be filmed, analyzed and stored on a server.

And here comes the UK

Amazingly, the land Down Under isn’t even the first country to suggest this: the UK in its furious efforts to put national constraints on accessing pornography made a similar suggestion earlier this month.

Facial recognition tech was the perfect anecdote to unlawful onanists, explained Blighty's junior culture minister Matt Warman "so long as there is an appropriate concern for privacy.”

Quite right, Matt. And how is the UK’s age-verification program for porn going? Well, it isn’t. The government formally abandoned the effort just over a week ago because it couldn’t get the technology to work.

It hasn’t given up though: it will find a way! A national database of dick pics, anyone? ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021