So how well did you block fake news, Google? Facebook? Web goliaths turn in self-assessment homework to Europe

Unsurprisingly, commish thought that, in fact, they could do better


The European Commission has published its first year of reports from platforms including Google, Microsoft, Twitter and seven European trade associations on how they are countering disinformation.

The commission warned there was still a long way to go and major differences with just how open and transparent the companies were being.

The annual reports are made by signatories to the Code of Practice on Disinformation (in the digital single market), launched in October last year.

While the commission commended the companies for saying they would be more transparent, it chided:

However, progress varies a lot between signatories and the reports provide little insight on the actual impact of the self-regulatory measures taken over the past year as well as mechanisms for independent scrutiny.

It also wants the platforms to cooperate more fully with researchers trying to put them under the microscope – it described current cooperation as "episodic and arbitrary".

The commission said companies' action before the Euro elections in May had limited interference. But it warned that "large-scale automated propaganda and disinformation persist and there is more work to be done under all areas of the Code. We cannot accept this as a new normal."

Facebook and Google

Facebook's report includes figures from its political adverts, which reveal big differences across Europe.

Between March and September 2019, there were 31,586 political ads shown to Facebook users in Austria and a cost of €2,071,030, while German users saw 102,107 ads at a cost of €5,263,186.

Facebook's report (PDF) also justifies its policy of reducing the distribution of political misinformation rather than actually removing it from the site. This apparently "strikes the right balance between giving people a place to express themselves and creating a community that's safe and authentic".

Google's report (PDF), meanwhile, pointed to its tweaked "ranking systems", which now "elevate authoritative information in our search results, in our recommendations, or as context provided to users as part of their journey using our products". It also wrote about taking down 9 million videos from YouTube in Q2 of 2019, up from 6 million in the previous quarter. It added that for vids that come "close to violating our policies, our systems may include more videos from authoritative sources (like top news channels) in the 'watch next' panel".

The commission said it was continuing to evaluate whether the code was actually working. As part of this process, it will hire an external consultant to measure progress. Time to send in your CVs, readers.

The body will also issue a report into the 2019 election in the next few months.

More from the commission here. ®


Other stories you might like

  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022