Ex from Hell gets six years for online stalking, revenge pics campaign against two women

Rare sign of criminal justice system actually working in these kinds of cases

A man from Virginia has been handed a six year prison sentence for stalking and threatening two ex-girlfriends with revenge porn pictures and video clips.

Satyasurya Sahas Thumma was given the prison term on November 7 after he was convicted on counts of cyberstalking, unauthorized access of a protected computer, and aggravated identity theft.

Someone demanding freedom of speech

Revenge pornography ban tramples free speech, law tossed out – where else but Texas!


It was found that on two occasions in 2018, Thumma conducted extended harassment campaigns against women who had ended relationships with him. On both occasions, the harassment and threats centered around nude photos and video clips the women had sent him during their time together.

In the first incident, beginning in April of 2018, Thumma posed as an anonymous person who was in possession of the pictures and clips. He used a messaging app with a fake phone number to send the pictures to the woman, then created a Snapchat account which he used to post the photos. From there, he proceeded to share the account and photos with the woman's friends and parents.

And it only gets worse from there.

The second woman, who dated Thumma for several months beginning in the summer of 2018, was subjected to not only stalking and harassment, but also threats of violence and manipulation.

In that case, Thumma also created an anonymous persona, but rather than simply harassing the woman with threats of releasing the nude photos and videos, he concocted an elaborate story where the persona was menacing Thumma and the woman. This account was used to harass the woman and make extortion demands and threats of violence.

Again, Thumma sent the nude photos to the victim's parents and the email account of their church. He also hacked both her Twitter and Facebook accounts, and blamed it on the made-up persona.

This culminated in a March, 2019 incident where Thumma was hospitalized following a DUI traffic accident.

"While lying on a hospital bed wearing a gown that appeared to be spattered with some blood, Thumma feigned being unconscious and took a selfie photograph," the US attorney's office recounts.

"Several hours after being released from the hospital, Thumma used the anonymous texting application to send his hospital selfie photo to Victim 2 and her mom with the message, 'Ur next'."

Fortunately, the FBI was on Thumma's trail, and he was prosecuted by the Virginia Eastern District US Attorney's office. The well-earned six-year sentence was handed down by Judge John Gibney.

Katelyn Bowden, founder and CEO of revenge porn victim advocacy and support group BADASS, told The Register that Thumma's case is one of the rare instances where abusers are brought to justice.

"What we see here is a pattern and escalation - if the police hadn’t gotten involved, how many more victims of cyberstalking would this perpetrator had created? And how long before the abuse would had moved beyond the internet? It should be stopped after the first threat of online exposure," said Bowden.

"Also, note that Mr. Thumma had used apps to hide his identity from the victims. Not only is this completely cowardly, but it obviously provided him no anonymity. The men who commit image abuse often think they’re protected by these services, but the truth is - they’re still completely identifiable." ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022