Googlers fired after tracking colleagues working on US border cop projects. Now, if they had monetized that stalking...

Tech giant shocked at non-profitable abuse of info


Comment Google is under fire for sacking four staffers it says electronically stalked colleagues working on technology for the US Customs and Border Protection.

The four were fired after an investigation by the web giant revealed they had tracked fellow Googlers suspected of working on projects they didn’t like – namely, an in-development cloud services for US border cops. The four were also accused of leaking confidential information about their targets, an allegation they deny.

The four just so happened to be involved in labor organizing at the internet goliath, which also just ended its weekly Thank Google It's Friday meetings in which staff quizzed bosses. And also tapped up union-busting consultancy IRI. And has weathered internal protests about its poor handling of sexual harassment complaints. And saw more than 200 unhappy San Francisco staffers walk out briefly last Friday. And, yeah, you get the idea.

When the e-stalking was noticed, the targets reported feeling “scared or unsafe,” and asked to be physically relocated, according to a staff memo circulated by the internal investigations team that was leaked to Bloomberg. Despite being warned not to look at nor gather information on people not in their team or related to their job, however, the four individuals continued to harvest info about their targets, Google claimed.

The four were accused of leaking copies of corporate emails and other inside information about their targets to the outside world, a move the now-ex-employees say is a lie: they deny any wrongdoing.

The fired Googlers are otherwise unrepentant, and claim they were axed in retaliation for speaking out. They argued on Monday that a section of the corporation's code of conduct that says Google employees should “speak up if you see something that you think isn’t right” provided ample justification for tracking and scrutinizing their colleagues.

revolt

Google internal revolt grows as search-engine Spartacuses prepare strike over China

READ MORE

They also point to the fact that they were not told specifically that they couldn’t read all the documents produced by certain individuals. Nor were they told they couldn’t set up a system that alerted them whenever someone they were targeting added anything to their internal calendar – which, apparently, included everything from one-to-one meetings to medical appointments and family events.

Indeed, at Google, staff are allowed to drop in on what others are working on and their calendars to find out how projects are progressing and which need help, or to learn new stuff, and so on. Workers are also encouraged to speak their mind and grill executives on their decisions. This open culture appears to have hit the buffers.

“Looking at such documents is a big part of Google culture,” the stalkers explained, besides “the policy was unclear, even explicitly stating the documents didn’t have to be labeled to be off limits.”

This whole affair is rather messy: one of those fired was told by the investigations team that he wasn’t being accused of leaking when he asked them if he was. Speaking through a megaphone pointed at Google's offices in San Francisco where he had until recently been employed, Laurence Berland, who previously protested against YouTube's handling of hate speech, explained, very loudly: “I asked Google’s Global Investigations team, am I being accused of leaking? Their answer was one word: ‘No.’ This isn’t about leaking.”

And yet the internal memo is about allegations of leaking, well, at least in part. Mostly about the stalking, though.

For many, these clampdowns and firings demonstrate that Google may not in fact be a Utopian oasis that overpays techies and offers a seemingly endless array of free perks while possessing none of the complexities of a vast corporation.

Now if only the fired Thanksgiving Four had figured out a way to monetize their tracking efforts. ®

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Google has more reasons why it doesn't like antitrust law that affects Google
    It'll ruin Gmail, claims web ads giant

    Google has a fresh list of reasons why it opposes tech antitrust legislation making its way through Congress but, like others who've expressed discontent, the ad giant's complaints leave out mention of portions of the proposed law that address said gripes.

    The law bill in question is S.2992, the Senate version of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which is closer than ever to getting votes in the House and Senate, which could see it advanced to President Biden's desk.

    AICOA prohibits tech companies above a certain size from favoring their own products and services over their competitors. It applies to businesses considered "critical trading partners," meaning the company controls access to a platform through which business users reach their customers. Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta in one way or another seemingly fall under the scope of this US legislation. 

    Continue reading
  • Makers of ad blockers and browser privacy extensions fear the end is near
    Overhaul of Chrome add-ons set for January, Google says it's for all our own good

    Special report Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.

    Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.

    The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.

    Continue reading
  • Brave Search leaves beta, offers Goggles for filtering, personalizing results
    Freedom or echo chamber?

    Brave Software, maker of a privacy-oriented browser, on Wednesday said its surging search service has exited beta testing while its Goggles search personalization system has entered beta testing.

    Brave Search, which debuted a year ago, has received 2.5 billion search queries since then, apparently, and based on current monthly totals is expected to handle twice as many over the next year. The search service is available in the Brave browser and in other browsers by visiting search.brave.com.

    "Since launching one year ago, Brave Search has prioritized independence and innovation in order to give users the privacy they deserve," wrote Josep Pujol, chief of search at Brave. "The web is changing, and our incredible growth shows that there is demand for a new player that puts users first."

    Continue reading
  • Never fear, the White House is here to tackle web trolls
    'No one should have to endure abuse just because they are attempting to participate in society'

    A US task force aims to prevent online harassment and abuse, with a specific focus on protecting women, girls and LGBTQI+ individuals.

    In the next 180 days, the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse will, among other things, draft a blueprint on a "whole-of-government approach" to stopping "technology-facilitated, gender-based violence." 

    A year after submitting the blueprint, the group will provide additional recommendations that federal and state agencies, service providers, technology companies, schools and other organisations should take to prevent online harassment, which VP Kamala Harris noted often spills over into physical violence, including self-harm and suicide for victims of cyberstalking as well mass shootings.

    Continue reading
  • Abortion rights: US senators seek ban on sale of health location data
    With Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v Wade, privacy is key

    A group of senators wants to make it illegal for data brokers to sell sensitive location and health information of individuals' medical treatment.

    A bill filed this week by five senators, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), comes in anticipation the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling that could overturn the 49-year-old Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing access to abortion for women in the US.

    The worry is that if the Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade – as is anticipated following the leak in May of a majority draft ruling authored by Justice Samuel Alito – such sensitive data can be used against women.

    Continue reading
  • Cisco warns of security holes in its security appliances
    Bugs potentially useful for rogue insiders, admin account hijackers

    Cisco has alerted customers to another four vulnerabilities in its products, including a high-severity flaw in its email and web security appliances. 

    The networking giant has issued a patch for that bug, tracked as CVE-2022-20664. The flaw is present in the web management interface of Cisco's Secure Email and Web Manager and Email Security Appliance in both the virtual and hardware appliances. Some earlier versions of both products, we note, have reached end of life, and so the manufacturer won't release fixes; it instead told customers to migrate to a newer version and dump the old.

    This bug received a 7.7 out of 10 CVSS severity score, and Cisco noted that its security team is not aware of any in-the-wild exploitation, so far. That said, given the speed of reverse engineering, that day is likely to come. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022