This article is more than 1 year old

Onestream slammed for 'slamming' vulnerable and elderly folk: That's £35k to Ofcom, please

Comms provider switched 118 people to its services without their consent

Updated Imagine a telco kicking down your front door, yelling "all your bills are belong to us" then leaving. In the industry parlance, it's known as "slamming" and Ofcom has fined Onestream £35,000 for the practice.

An investigation by the UK comms regulator found that the Hampshire-based broadband and landline minnow, launched 2018, had taken over the telephone services of more than a hundred customers without their consent between 13 April 2018 and 25 January 2019. The watchdog's ruling said Onestream went about this a couple of ways by:

  • making cold calls to customers without making it clear to them that Onestream was an entirely separate phone company who was trying to switch their home phone services from their current phone company to Onestream. We have found that for at least 45 of the 118 customers, Onestream engaged in Slamming by attempting to switch them without ever obtaining the customer's express permission to do so; and
  • by putting in place and implementing a policy, to make repeated attempts to switch customers to Onestream without contacting them each time to seek permission to switch them. This was despite customers asking their current phone company to cancel the previous attempt by Onestream to switch them. We have found that Onestream did this in the case of at least 113 of the 118 customers.

To make matters worse, Ofcom said that three-quarters of those "slammed" were "elderly or vulnerable".

This aggressive form of mis-selling was found to be in direct contravention of Ofcom's General Condition C7.3(a) [PDF], which regulates how customers switch between telecoms providers. The section basically says: "Yeah, slamming? The act of switching someone from one company to another without their permission? Do not do this."

Thus Ofcom saw fit to level a penalty of £35,000 at Onestream, discounted 30 per cent because the firm held its hands up and said soz. The fine is minuscule compared to the £300,000 Ofcom smacked Kent-based True Telecom for in 2017, but the regulator said this was the most severe penalty it could impose – 10 per cent of the company's turnover.

It added: "Had Onestream been a bigger company with a higher turnover, the penalty could have been set at a higher level."

Onestream is now required to release all affected customers from their contracts free of charge and refund the early termination fees of those who had already switched away from its services.

The company has also written to all customers who switched as a result of a cold call, informing them that they can quit their contract without penalty whenever they like.

The money, due within 20 working days, goes to the Treasury. ®

Updated to add

A spokesperson for Onestream has been in touch to say it has introduced "safeguards throughout the business, ensuring there can be no repetition of the mistakes that were made."

"Proven and respected industry professionals now hold key positions within the Onestream organisation who, working closely with independent consultants have revised all processes and implemented best practice to achieve positive change," she added.

"All affected customers have been fully compensated, released from all and any contractual obligation and have received a full and unreserved apology."


Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics


Send us news

Other stories you might like