Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Pentagon's $10bn JEDI decision 'risky for the country and democracy,' says AWS CEO Jassy

Presidential 'disdain' may have been a factor in awarding mega-contract to Microsoft, says cloud supremo

re:Invent Amazon Web Services CEO Andy Jassy faced the press yesterday at Amazon's re:Invent conference in Las Vegas, and there was one thing above all else that journos wanted to discuss.

Why was Amazon heading to court to challenge the US Department of Defense's decision to award its $10bn winner-takes-all JEDI IT project to Microsoft rather than to, well, AWS?

“We’re in the middle of an act of litigation so there’s a limited amount I can say about it, but … we feel pretty strongly that it was not adjudicated fairly,” said Jassy. “If you do a truly objective and detailed apples to apples comparison of the platforms you don’t end up in the spot where that decision was made.

jedi

Use the courts, Jeff: Amazon to contest Microsoft scooping $10bn JEDI contract

READ MORE

“Most of our customers tell us that we’re a couple of years ahead both with regard to functionality and maturity. I think we ended up with a situation where there was significant political interference.” Jassy claimed that having “a sitting president who’s willing to share openly his disdain for a company,” namely the Jeff Bezos-owned Amazon, makes it “really difficult for government agencies including the DoD to make an objective decision without fear of reprisal.”

Bezos also owns The Washington Post, which has drawn Trump's ire in the past, as well as Amazon.

Jassy shared his view that it is “it’s really risky for the country and for democracy for decisions ... that are this important, we’re talking about the national security of our country and modernising their technology platform … you have to make sure that those decisions are made truly objectively.”

Pressed further, Jassy added that, “I know the respective offerings quite well. And I know the components quite well. I also know what the criteria was for Jedi and I’ve got a lot of information about the evaluation, so I feel pretty strongly that it was not adjudicated fairly and the conclusion I make is that there was a lot of political interference here.”

Was JEDI, along with annoyance at Microsoft's licensing hikes for using its software on AWS, a reason why Jassy took aim at the Redmond company on several occasions here at re:Invent? That certainly seems plausible. ®

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like