Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Amazon to ask court to block DoD's $10bn early Valentine's date with a Microsoft JEDI

Not keen to let them Hang Solo. (We're here all week.) Next Friday's filing aims to stop work before it begins on 11 Feb

Amazon Web Services is expecting a decision next month from a US court about whether the brakes will be slammed on the Pentagon's lucrative Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) contract awarded to Microsoft.

The filing (PDF), on 13 January, sets up the lawyer paydays schedule for key dates including 11 February, when AWS and Microsoft's lawyers have agreed to expect a court to decide on AWS's motion for a temporary restraining order. A preliminary injunction is also possibly on the cards.

The significance of February – and the reason for the sped-up negotiated schedule – is that three days before Valentine's, the $10bn mega-contract is supposed to begin, and, as the filing notes, "the United States has previously advised AWS and the Court [it] will begin on February 11, 2020," reiterating that "the United States' consistent position that the services to be procured under the Contract are urgently needed in support of national security."

Interestingly, the US – via the Department of Defense – said in the document that in this specific "bid protest case, it does not intend to file an answer" to AWS's complaint.

Microsoft and the US government have agreed to file their motions to dismiss on 24 January - the same date AWS is flinging out its "temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction" to pull the JEDI light saber away from Microsoft.

Microsoft's win of the Joint Enterprise Defense Initiative (JEDI) contract, potentially worth up to $10bn over 10 years came as a bit of surprise when it was finally awarded back in October. AWS had seemed the front runner throughout most of the tortuous process, which saw the likes of Oracle fall by the wayside (replete with an Ellisonesque tantrum protest.)

However, it was Nadella's team that snatched the prize.

james kirk

Amazon: Trump photon-torpedoed our $10bn JEDI dream because he hates CEO Jeff Bezos

READ MORE

AWS is understandably unhappy about the situation and, as is so often the case, rolled out the lawyers. Its initial formal appeal of the decision, filed on 9 December last year, memorably pointed at least one finger of blame for the loss at tweeter-in-chief, US President Donald Trump who, it is fair to say, is no fan of Amazon (and Washington Post) boss, Jeff Bezos.

Should it get the nod, AWS's injunction will "prevent the issuance of substantive task orders under the contract" despite the US's position that the services "are urgently needed in support of national security."

On the plus side, the parties (the US, Microsoft and Amazon) have agreed to expedite things and have asked the Court to similarly "expedite consideration of the issue."

We've contacted Microsoft to see what it makes of the affair, which told us: "Microsoft do not have anything to share on this." ®

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like