Co-Op Insurance and IBM play blame game over collapse of £175m megaproject

What happens when big tech ventures completely fail? A High Court trial!

In a long-running spat, British insurer Co-Op Insurance is suing IBM for £155m over what it claims is Big Blue's "deliberate" failure to deliver a new IT platform for the British financial services provider.

In legal arguments shown to London's High Court this week, CIS General Insurance Ltd (CISGIL) – the insurance arm of the well-known Co-Op brand – said IBM UK Ltd had screwed up the Co-Op's Project Cobalt to the point where even the first stage of the £175m contract had not been delivered 15 months after its deadline.

In documents seen by The Register, the Co-Op explained:

"Project Cobalt was part of a wider transformation programme whereby CISGIL sought to migrate its general insurance business from the legacy IT infrastructure it shared with the Coop [sic] Bank, which was being separated from the Coop Group, to a new, modern insurance platform."

It added: "Project Cobalt also marked the start of a strategic move by IBM into the insurance platform sector," saying that IBM subcontracted the work to "a company called the Innovation Group", or IG. That firm's Insurer Suite product, lawyers told judge Mrs Justice O'Farrell, "did not exist as a configurable out-of-the-box solution as had been represented" by IBM.

The Royal Courts of Justice in London

IBM: Co-Op Insurance talking direct to coding subcontractor helped collapse of £55m IT revamp project


Jacqui Boast, then CEO of IG, is said by the Co-Op to have told IBM in late 2015, not long after the contract was signed, that "Insurer Suite had been written for the US insurance market, not the UK insurance market, and that it had to be and was being substantially rewritten and re-developed" for the Co-Op. This is disputed by IBM, which promises to show the court a "quantitative code analysis" proving otherwise.

IBM says in its defence that it terminated the contract after the Co-Op failed to pay "a software licence payment milestone" of £2.9m, something IBM described as "the tip of the iceberg". The Co-Op, said the American company, demanded IBM "complete the project without recompense, after which CISGIL would commence a claim for losses allegedly suffered owing to the delays".

Even though the Co-Op disputed IBM's progress on the project and withheld payment, IBM will argue that the Co-Op's "only lawful choice" at the time was to "pay now and argue later".

Thanks to the Co-Op failing to pay, argues IBM, the contract was effectively torn up and so none of its penalty clauses should apply; neither, says the US tech firm, should it be liable to pay damages to the Co-Op for the project's failure.

The trial will continue for the rest of this month. The Register will be covering key moments. The court will hear evidence from key people within the Co-Op, IBM and IG. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022