Social media notifications of the future: Ranger tagged you in a photo with Tessadora, Wrenlow, Faelina and Graylen

If you tolerate this then your children will be next


Choosing a name for one's offspring can be incredibly difficult. You don't want them to be the ninth Jaxon in class, but you also don't want them to be bullied mercilessly for the rest of their lives.

Even so, parents are increasingly pulling appellations out of their arses, in some cases to give their child a "unique" identity on social media.

Citing a survey of 1,772 mums and dads, Brit news agency SWNS claims 7 per cent have picked out a one-shot name for their sprog, while 65 per cent were said to be considering it.

72 per cent believe a unique name will help their child "stand out in life" and – astonishingly – 2 per cent even "made up" a name with the express purpose of their kid being easily found on social media.

Taking a name each parent likes and smashing it together is also gaining ground, with 10 per cent of couples trying this to prevent arguments. Nine per cent have also mixed the names of their relatives.

A third think one-off names will make their tot "feel special", though 16 per cent say using them can be perceived as "showing off". We're not sure "showing off" is the term. Tone-deaf berks, maybe.

The top "made-up" names for girls were said to be Maevery, Faelina, Idalia, Evabeth, Tessadora, Anaveah, Jessalie, Sylvalie, Sophiel and Elisobelle. For boys they were Jaspin, Charleston, Brigham, Ranger, Wrenlow, Eastley, Graylen, Albion, Tovin and Cedar.

As usual, the girls' names are pretty and fey. The boys' names are still crap, even with parents putting their "creative" hats on.

Game of Thrones, the TV hit based on the Song of Ice and Fire novels, continues to be a source of inspiration – though we'd hope the trend of naming girls "Khaleesi" has perished in dragon fire by now.

Thankfully, some sanity seems to have prevailed, as only 8 per cent saw no downsides to "unconventional" names, while two-thirds said they would worry about spellings and pronunciations if they deviated too far.

Honestly, who cares? All names are "made up" in one way or another and it's the parents who end up looking like twats, not the kids. The most disturbing thing is folk getting excited to sign their children's right to privacy away on social media before they are able to have a say.

The effects of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat and the like on young people's mental health has long been a concern so why not think of names that make it even harder for them to engage with such platforms?

We're thinking... password managers? "I will not tell you again, f#NmEs6ppQ8$." "What did I just say, y^ZkPBL33^#9?" "X86oumv9#If4, eat two more mouthfuls of greens, then you can have pudding." And so on.

Or go whole-hog Hollywood. "Maximus Decimus Meridius, Commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions, loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Father to a murdered son, husband to a murdered wife. And I will have my vengeance, in this life or the next, stop hitting your sister right now, mister." ®

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Metaverse progress update: Some VR headset prototypes nowhere near shipping
    But when it does work, bet you'll fall over yourselves to blow ten large on designer clobber for your avy

    Facebook owner Meta's pivot to the metaverse is drawing significant amounts of resources: not just billions in case, but time. The tech giant has demonstrated some prototype virtual-reality headsets that aren't close to shipping and highlight some of the challenges that must be overcome.

    The metaverse is CEO Mark Zuckerberg's grand idea of connected virtual worlds in which people can interact, play, shop, and work. For instance, inhabitants will be able to create avatars to represent themselves, wearing clothes bought using actual money – with designer gear going for five figures.

    Apropos of nothing, Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg is leaving the biz.

    Continue reading
  • GPUs aren’t always your best bet, Twitter ML tests suggest
    Graphcore processor outperforms Nvidia rival in team's experiments

    GPUs are a powerful tool for machine-learning workloads, though they’re not necessarily the right tool for every AI job, according to Michael Bronstein, Twitter’s head of graph learning research.

    His team recently showed Graphcore’s AI hardware offered an “order of magnitude speedup when comparing a single IPU processor to an Nvidia A100 GPU,” in temporal graph network (TGN) models.

    “The choice of hardware for implementing Graph ML models is a crucial, yet often overlooked problem,” reads a joint article penned by Bronstein with Emanuele Rossi, an ML researcher at Twitter, and Daniel Justus, a researcher at Graphcore.

    Continue reading
  • Facebook phishing campaign nets millions in IDs and cash
    Hundreds of millions of stolen credentials and a cool $59 million

    An ongoing phishing campaign targeting Facebook users may have already netted hundreds of millions of credentials and a claimed $59 million, and it's only getting bigger.

    Identified by security researchers at phishing prevention company Pixm in late 2021, the campaign has only been running since the final quarter of last year, but has already proven incredibly successful. Just one landing page - out of around 400 Pixm found - got 2.7 million visitors in 2021, and has already tricked 8.5 million viewers into visiting it in 2022. 

    The flow of this phishing campaign isn't unique: Like many others targeting users on social media, the attack comes as a link sent via DM from a compromised account. That link performs a series of redirects, often through malvertising pages to rack up views and clicks, ultimately landing on a fake Facebook login page. That page, in turn, takes the victim to advert landing pages that generate additional revenue for the campaign's organizers. 

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022