Oracle plays its Trump card: Blushing Big Red gushes over US govt support in Java API battle... just as Larry Ellison holds Donald fundraiser

Unfortunate timing – the Obama admin also supported the database giant

The US solicitor general Noel Francisco on Wednesday filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Oracle in its Java API copyright lawsuit against Google, scheduled to be argued before the US Supreme Court next month.

Uncle Sam's brief [PDF] was submitted to the court on the same day Oracle supremo Larry Ellison held a re-election fundraiser for President Donald Trump at his estate in Rancho Mirage in California.

The Register has seen no evidence of any quid pro quo in the coincidence of these events. For what it's worth, Donald Verrilli, solicitor general under President Obama, took a similar position in 2015, to the delight of Oracle. And, don't forget, Ellison, like all tech zillionaires, likes to raise money for politicians left and right: it's good for business to keep lawmakers and presidents on-side.

The latest Justice Department brief runs 40 pages, 12 more than the legal eagles' similar filing [PDF] last September, in which the government urged the court not to accept Google's petition. It argues that the web giant's use of Java software interfaces is not permissible as fair use.

"[Google] suggests...that it was entitled to copy 11,330 lines of [Oracle's] declaring code because that code standing alone is not commercially valuable," the brief states. "If that approach were sound, a developer could steal half of another developer’s program and finish it herself, so long as the stolen half did not function on its own."

The case dates back to 2010 when Oracle sued Google for patent and copyright infringement over its use of Java application programming interfaces (APIs) in its mobile Android operating system. The patent claims were eventually rejected, but the copyright claim proceeded to trial and in 2012, Judge William Alsup ruled that APIs are not subject to copyright.

Oracle appealed and in 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed Alsup's finding about APIs but left open the possibility that Google's infringement may be allowable under the fair use doctrine. Google's effort in 2015 to have the Supreme Court take up the API question was denied.

Boxing ring ropes and referee in black clothes

In the red corner, Big Red, and in the blue corner... the rest of the tech industry


The case then went to back to Northern California District Court, where a jury in 2016 found Google's Java infringement to be fair use. Oracle then appealed and in 2018 the Federal Circuit found in favor of Oracle. The following year, Google again appealed to the Supreme Court and this time its petition was accepted. Oral arguments are now scheduled for March 24 with a decision expected in June.

The Supreme Court will decide whether copyright protection extends to a software interface and whether Google's use of Java APIs to create a new program, Android, constitutes fair use.

If Oracle prevails, the decision is expected to have a significant impact on the future of software development by forcing developers to obtain licenses when working with copyrighted APIs and by opening the door to potential legal claims in cases where such APIs have been used without permission.

In a blog post on Thursday, Oracle EVP Ken Glueck, voiced appreciation for the support the company has received for its effort to hold Google accountable. "It’s really hard to overstate how strong the Solicitor General’s brief is on Oracle’s behalf," he said.

Glueck also claimed that Google's chief legal officer, Kent Walker, has tried to prevent other organizations from filing briefs in support of Oracle.

"Over the past few months, Walker led a coercion campaign against companies and organizations that were likely to file on Oracle’s behalf to persuade them to stay silent.," he said. "We are aware of more than half a dozen contacts by Mr. Walker (or his representatives) to likely amici, but we probably only heard of a small piece of his efforts."

The Register asked Oracle to provide evidence of its claim and to name companies allegedly approached by Walker. Oracle declined to do so.

We also asked Google to comment on Oracle's assertion about Walker. The company responded but did not actually address whether Walker did what Oracle contends.

"A remarkable range of consumers, developers, computer scientists, and businesses agree that open software interfaces promote innovation and that no single company should be able to monopolize creativity by blocking software tools from working together," said Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda, in a statement emailed to The Register.

"Openness and interoperability have helped developers create a variety of new products that consumers use to communicate, work, and play across different platforms." ®

PS: Some 300 Oracle employees protested outside their offices against Ellison's Trump fundraiser.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021