How many times do we have to tell you? A Tesla isn't a self-driving car, say investigators after Apple man's fatal crash

'It's time to stop pretending they have driverless cars. Because they don't'

The deadly crash of an Apple engineer's Tesla was down to the victim being overly trusting of the car's Autopilot software while distracted by his phone, America's National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) concluded this week.

On March 23, 2018, Walter Huang was driving a Model X P100D in Autopilot mode south along the Route 101 freeway in California, and headed toward an exit ramp on the right-hand side. Suddenly, his Tesla turned left, and sped up from 62mph to a little over 70mph, and plowed into a barrier.

Huang was killed. The vehicle’s electric battery also erupted in flames shortly after; it took 200 gallons of water and foam to put the blaze out. Five days later, the battery reignited while in storage, and had to hosed down again.

After a thorough examination of the tragedy, the NTSB blamed “system limitations” in Tesla’s Autopilot software, and the driver at the time being distracted “likely from a cellphone game application,” said Robert Sumwalt, the chairman of the board.

A final hearing, held on Tuesday, did not address why the vehicle suddenly sped up and turned; that may well be because, incredibly, Tesla refused to cooperate with the probe.

Members of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), questioned during the hearing, said Tesla snubbed requests to describe how its cars were designed to operate under specific conditions, and that Elon Musk's engineers did not intend to take any actions regarding NHTSA’s recommendations in its previous safety reports.

Tesla's Autopilot – a super-cruise-control feature rather than a true autonomous vehicle system – was described as a "beta"-grade feature by the NTSB. Drivers should keep their hands on the wheel when the software is engaged; Autopilot is supposed to then, under the watchful eye of its human, navigate its way through traffic automatically on certain freeways.

The board noted Tesla had improved the built-in warning system that flashes alerts if a driver has let go of the steering wheel for too long when Autopilot mode is active. In Europe, that time is 15 seconds, according to Ensar Becic, an investigator at the NTSB.


Researchers trick Tesla into massively breaking the speed limit by sticking a 2-inch piece of electrical tape on a sign


Outside Europe, however, the timing of the warning depends on speed. For example, at 25mph, a driver can take their hands off the steering wheel for 60 seconds. At 90mph, that drops to ten seconds.

There was a third factor in Huang’s crash besides the adaptive cruise control software and human distraction. As his car swerved into the barrier, it hit an attenuator – a structure deliberately placed by the road to absorb the impact of any crashes and minimize injuries. The attenuator was already damaged from a previous prang, and if it had been repaired, it’s likely Huang would have survived his collision, NTSB staff said.

The attenuator was whacked on March 12, eleven days before the Autopilot accident. Although the California Highway Patrol responded to that earlier prang, the cops failed to report the damage sustained by the attenuator.

A maintenance crew from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) later spotted the knackered safety device, and on March 20 placed a series of cones around it in anticipation of repairing it in future. However, Caltrans was too late, and three days later Huang lost his life after hitting the faulty crash attenuator.

Smartphones they're just too bloody addictive

Sumwalt not only blamed auto manufacturers, such as Tesla and Uber, for failing to implement sufficient safeguards to protect drivers in computer-controlled cars. He also singled out Apple, Huang’s employer, for building a smartphone that was too addictive to put down, even while driving.

“So given that, I'd say that Apple has yet to recognize their own responsibility as an employer; that they have failed to say, of our over 135,000 employees, that we care about you, and we don't want you to go out and kill yourself or others on the roadway,” the chairman said. “Apple has failed in that respect.”

During the hearing, the NTSB urged smartphone makers Apple, Lenovo, LG, Motorola, Samsung, and Sony to develop a mechanism or app that would automatically disable any handheld's “driver distracting functions” while in a moving car.

Sumwalt slammed Apple again later: “We have one recommendation to Apple Inc which reads: develop a company policy that bans the non-emergency use of portable devices while driving by all employees and contractors driving company vehicles and operating portable electronic devices or using a portable electronic device to engage in work related communications.”

Other recommendations included probing deeper into Tesla’s Autopilot software, developing safety standards to prevent drivers taking their hands off the wheel, and testing vehicles equipped with automated control systems to analyse driver and car performance before and during crashes.

The NTSB also wants manufacturers to report incidents, detailing things like the number of miles driven before the prang, whenever vehicles crash in autonomous or semi-autonomous mode.

“If Tesla Inc does not incorporate system safeguards that limit the use of its autopilot systems to the conditions for which it was designed, continued use of the system beyond its design domain is foreseeable and the risk for future crashes will remain,” the NTSB warned.

“Every vehicle sold to US consumers requires the driver to be actively engaged in the driving task – even when partial driving automation systems are on,” Sumwalt added. “It's time to stop enabling drivers in any partially automated vehicle to pretend that they have driverless cars. Because they don't have driverless cars. I'll say it for the third time.”

Tesla declined The Register's request for comment. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • A peek into Gigabyte's GPU Arm for AI, HPC shops
    High-performance platform choices are going beyond the ubiquitous x86 standard

    Arm-based servers continue to gain momentum with Gigabyte Technology introducing a system based on Ampere's Altra processors paired with Nvidia A100 GPUs, aimed at demanding workloads such as AI training and high-performance compute (HPC) applications.

    The G492-PD0 runs either an Ampere Altra or Altra Max processor, the latter delivering 128 64-bit cores that are compatible with the Armv8.2 architecture.

    It supports 16 DDR4 DIMM slots, which would be enough space for up to 4TB of memory if all slots were filled with 256GB memory modules. The chassis also has space for no fewer than eight Nvidia A100 GPUs, which would make for a costly but very powerful system for those workloads that benefit from GPU acceleration.

    Continue reading
  • GitLab version 15 goes big on visibility and observability
    GitOps fans can take a spin on the free tier for pull-based deployment

    One-stop DevOps shop GitLab has announced version 15 of its platform, hot on the heels of pull-based GitOps turning up on the platform's free tier.

    Version 15.0 marks the arrival of GitLab's next major iteration and attention this time around has turned to visibility and observability – hardly surprising considering the acquisition of OpsTrace as 2021 drew to a close, as well as workflow automation, security and compliance.

    GitLab puts out monthly releases –  hitting 15.1 on June 22 –  and we spoke to the company's senior director of Product, Kenny Johnston, at the recent Kubecon EU event, about what will be added to version 15 as time goes by. During a chat with the company's senior director of Product, Kenny Johnston, at the recent Kubecon EU event, The Register was told that this was more where dollars were being invested into the product.

    Continue reading
  • To multicloud, or not: Former PayPal head engineer weighs in
    Not everyone needs it, but those who do need to consider 3 things, says Asim Razzaq

    The push is on to get every enterprise thinking they're missing out on the next big thing if they don't adopt a multicloud strategy.

    That shove in the multicloud direction appears to be working. More than 75 percent of businesses are now using multiple cloud providers, according to Gartner. That includes some big companies, like Boeing, which recently chose to spread its bets across AWS, Google Cloud and Azure as it continues to eliminate old legacy systems. 

    There are plenty of reasons to choose to go with multiple cloud providers, but Asim Razzaq, CEO and founder at cloud cost management company Yotascale, told The Register that choosing whether or not to invest in a multicloud architecture all comes down to three things: How many different compute needs a business has, budget, and the need for redundancy. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022