Campaigners cry foul play as Oracle funds conservative lobby group supporting its court case against Google

Google-funded think tanks need to sit back and, er, have a think

Campaigners have reacted angrily to Oracle's decision to fund the Internet Accountability Project (IAP), a lobby group which has – surprisingly enough – supported Oracle's claim against Google in the US Supreme Court.

The IAP, among others, has filed amicus brief supporting Oracle's position in the case. IAP said it wants to "ensure that Google respects the copyrights of Oracle and other innovators".

Since then it has come to light that Oracle is, in fact, helping to fund the IAP. An Oracle political activity report (PDF) released late last year shows that in 2019 it donated between $25,000 and $99,999 to the IAP, known for its conservative-leaning views on internet policy.

Ashkhen Kazaryan, director of civil liberties and legal research fellow of nonprofit think tank TechFreedom, told The Register that the donation "is problematic since the IAP refuses to disclose its funding while demanding [funding transparency] of real research institutions.

"They go after many respected think tanks and call them 'Google shills' while themselves getting money directly from Oracle – a key competitor of Google. IAP has done a ton of work supporting Oracle's positions, including filling in their support of Oracle in the Supreme Court Case Oracle v Google."

The IAP is registered as "social welfare organization, such as a civic organization or a neighborhood association" [501c4] and therefore is not required to disclose its funding.

At the time of the IAP's February submission to the Supreme Court, Mike Davis, the founder and president, said:

With a straight face, Google is claiming that stealing copyrighted computer code from Oracle is "fair use." There is nothing fair about Google's absurd interpretation of the "fair use" doctrine to justify Google's theft of Oracle's intellectual property. Google's theft of Oracle's property was about money, pure and simple.

Oracle's copyright lawsuit against Google dates back to 2010, when Oracle sued Google for infringement over its use of Java APIs in its Android operating system.

Oral arguments in the Google vs Oracle Supreme Court battle are now scheduled for 24 March with a decision expected in June. It is set to decide if copyright protection applies to a software interface and whether Google's use of Java APIs in Android constitutes fair use.

Whatever the Court decides, funding of lobby groups by tech giants – on either side – is unlikely to be seen as fair.

Oracle has refused to comment to The Register on the issue. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022