Closed source? Pull the other one... We love open source, but not enough to share code for our own app, says GitHub

Reviews mixed as mobile software hits GA

GitHub's mobile app for developers and other team members working on projects in GitHub repositories is now generally available for users of iOS and Android.

The app was announced in November 2019 by Ryan Nystrom, director of engineering, at the Universe event and has been in beta since then, initially for iOS only, but now GA for both platforms.

Coding on a mobile device is largely not a great experience, though web-based IDEs have their place. The GitHub app however is aimed at all the other things developers do, such as raising or commenting on issues, approving pull requests (requests to merge new code), and responding to notifications such as @mentions .

Developers can drill down into pull requests and see the code that has been added or deleted. The app includes syntax highlighting for popular programming languages.

GitHub wrote the app separately for iOS and Android, using Swift for iOS and Kotlin on Google's platform. A native look and feel for each platform was favoured, rather than trying to do a cross-platform user interface or mimicking the GitHub website. In an interview, Nystrom and GitHub designer Brian Lovin explained how they mocked up a design for one platform and had the team on the other platform replicate it with appropriate adjustments. The downside of the approach is that the app works differently from visiting the GitHub website with a mobile browser, meaning more to learn.

The home menu of the GitHub mobile app

The home menu of the GitHub mobile appe

We installed the app on both iOS and Android. Login uses OAuth, which means you are redirected to the web site when logging in, and 2-factor authentication works correctly.

The app has a bottom navigation bar with three options: Home for access to your GitHub issues, pull requests and repositories; Notifications which is in effect your GitHub inbox; and Search as a last resort for finding what you want. We successfully navigated repositories, merged a pull request, created an issue and commented on another issue.

We found it to be genuinely useful, giving convenient access to GitHub from a smartphone or tablet. It only offers a small subset of what is available on GitHub's website though. "GitHub is an old product, there is a lot of stuff on Which subset of those features feel most coherent to put on a phone?" said Nystrom and Lovin in the interview referenced above.

What do developers think? Ratings are currently higher on Apple's platform (4.9 over 520 ratings) than on Android (4.1 with 395 ratings). "It's good that this has a mobile app now, but it's pretty useless; I can't change branches and can't edit any of my code. UI is also extremely barebones and I would like a sidebar menu to be able to more easily navigate rather than spamming the back button," said a user called Nixinova. They make an excellent point, there is a lot of back-button tapping involved in using this app.

User Sylvan Mably said: "Better hope you don't have a thousand-line diff in your package-lock.json at the beginning of your PR, because you're going to have to manually scroll through pages and pages of noise before you get to any relevant changes. Hopefully this functionality is under active development, because in its current state, the app is only useful for reviewing very small PRs." Another strong observation.

A common complaint is that the app only works with GitHub, and not with custom installations of GitHub Enterprise Server.

There is also plenty of appreciation, with comments like: "Finally! Way smoother than mobile view!"

GitHub for mobile is not open source (yet)

GitHub for mobile is not open source (yet)

It is a good start then, but not yet everything users hoped for. There is one oddity though. At the Universe event, GitHub CEO Nat Friedman stood on stage with a backdrop declaring, "Open source has won." Yet this mobile app is not open source, though Nystrom said on Twitter: "Not right now," implying the possibility of change.

Given the target market, that would seem an obvious route to useful improvements. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • AsmREPL: Wing your way through x86-64 assembly language

    Assemblers unite

    Ruby developer and internet japester Aaron Patterson has published a REPL for 64-bit x86 assembly language, enabling interactive coding in the lowest-level language of all.

    REPL stands for "read-evaluate-print loop", and REPLs were first seen in Lisp development environments such as Lisp Machines. They allow incremental development: programmers can write code on the fly, entering expressions or blocks of code, having them evaluated – executed – immediately, and the results printed out. This was viable because of the way Lisp blurred the lines between interpreted and compiled languages; these days, they're a standard feature of most scripting languages.

    Patterson has previously offered ground-breaking developer productivity enhancements such as an analogue terminal bell and performance-enhancing firmware for the Stack Overflow keyboard. This only has Ctrl, C, and V keys for extra-easy copy-pasting, but Patterson's firmware removes the tedious need to hold control.

    Continue reading
  • Microsoft adds Buy Now, Pay Later financing option to Edge – and everyone hates it

    There's always Use Another Browser

    As the festive season approaches, Microsoft has decided to add "Buy Now, Pay Later" financing options to its Edge browser in the US.

    The feature turned up in recent weeks, first in beta and canary before it was made available "by default" to all users of Microsoft Edge version 96.

    The Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) option pops up at the browser level (rather than on checkout at an ecommerce site) and permits users to split any purchase between $35 and $1,000 made via Edge into four instalments spread over six weeks.

    Continue reading
  • Visiting a booby-trapped webpage could give attackers code execution privileges on HP network printers

    Patches available for 150 affected products

    Tricking users into visiting a malicious webpage could allow malicious people to compromise 150 models of HP multi-function printers, according to F-Secure researchers.

    The Finland-headquartered infosec firm said it had found "exploitable" flaws in the HP printers that allowed attackers to "seize control of vulnerable devices, steal information, and further infiltrate networks in pursuit of other objectives such as stealing or changing other data" – and, inevitably, "spreading ransomware."

    "In all likelihood, a lot of companies are using these vulnerable devices," said F-Secure researchers Alexander Bolshev and Timo Hirvonen.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021