French monopoly watchdog orders Google to talk payment terms with French publishers

Copying article snippets could get costly, if web giant doesn't ditch them altogether


The French Competition Authority (FCA) has told Google to negotiate with French news companies to determine fees due for the re-use their content.

In a statement, the FCA said, Google's practices were "likely to constitute an abuse of a dominant position, and caused serious and immediate harm to the press sector."

The ruling gives Google three months to come to reach an acceptable price with French publishers for using snippets of their articles in Google News, Google Search, and other services.

"Since the European Copyright law came into force in France last year, we have been engaging with publishers to increase our support and investment in news," said Richard Gingras, VP of Google News, in a statement emailed to The Register. "We will comply with the FCA's order while we review it and continue those negotiations."

Gingras is referring to Article 11 of the EU's Copyright Directive, which in the true spirit of bureaucracy was renamed Article 15 in its final version. Article 11/15, referred to as the "link tax," gives publishers the right to be paid when large online aggregators and platforms like Facebook and Google republish article snippets.

google

OK, Google? Probably not! EU settles on wording for copyright reform legislation

READ MORE

Last September, Google said it would stop including snippets from French publishers in all Google services due to the Copyright Directive. The FCA has indicated that it considers the blanket refusal to compensate publishers an abuse of Google's market dominance. So if Google fails to negotiate in good faith, further sanctions may be forthcoming.

Google has said it does not make money from Google News. But in 2008, Marissa Mayer, Google VP at the time, reportedly estimated that the service was worth about $100m in terms of enhancing traffic served by its ad business. That figure was dubiously extrapolated to be $4.7bn in 2018 and convincingly shot down.

The ad biz has been presenting snippets of text created by publishers and news agencies in its news aggregation service Google News since the service launched in 2002.

In 2005, Agence France Presse sued Google for copyright infringement and such skirmishes have continued over the years with negligible effect – often publishers have negotiated with Google to resume inclusion because of the online traffic the search ad biz sends to news websites.

In 2006, Belgian publishers sued Google for including article snippets in Google News, even though they could opt-out by blocking Google's crawler. Google acceded to their demands and removed their articles from both Google News and Google Search, prompting a decline in online traffic. Those publishers then backtracked.

The legal fracas gave rise to an innovation fund, by which Google funneled money back to publishers and offered other forms of support as a sort of apology for capturing so much digital ad revenue. That arrangement eventually evolved into the $20m Google News Initiative.

In 2013 and 2015, Germany and Spain enacted copyright laws that allowed charges to be levied against aggregators for republishing article snippets. When Google refused to pay for snippets and stopped including them in Germany, publishers there eventually relented because their visitor traffic declined. Just before Spain's law took effect, Google in 2014 stopped offering Google News in that country and the service remains unavailable there.

A 2017 Stanford Business School study, supported by Microsoft Research, looked at Google News in Spain and found that it reduced overall news consumption among those who previously used the service by 20 per cent and reduced visits to news publisher websites by about 10 per cent.

It found that the decrease in traffic mainly hurt small publishers; larger publishers saw fewer article views balanced by more home page views. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021