Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Back when the huge shocking thing that felt like the end of the world was Australia on fire, it turns out telcos held up all right

Or as well as they could once the power went out - yet report says reliance on electricity isn't a resilience issue

Back in January when Australia was on fire and the rest of the world wasn’t, locals in the burning zones were advised that the best source of information was emergency services apps. But they were unavailable because mobile networks had gone down.

And now we know why: a new report titled “Impacts of the 2019-20 bushfires on the telecommunications network” reveals that power outages were the main source of network problems.

The report considered the impact of the fires on retail and wholesale networks, both wireless and wired and found that just one percent of outages were caused by fire damage to networks.

Power outages accounted for 779 out of 888 recorded outages and plenty of those power outages were caused by electricity infrastructure burning down. Some were caused by factors such as on-site backup generators running out of fuel, but the report doesn't enumerate such incidents and lumps them into an "other" category of outage explanations.

While carriers of course rushed to restore service, two-thirds of attempts to fix equipment encountered “site access restrictions, such as fallen trees.” Those hazards could only be found after fire authorities allowed telco technicians to access infrastructure. Waiting for that access contributed to delays in restoring some services, but carriers hustled to get temporary fixes in place in a third of cases. But sometimes fuel to fill a generator was not available – pumps weren’t working because they too relied on electricity.

"Information provided by the carriers indicated that backup power capability was generally available for all facilities that experienced an outage," the report says. It therefore offered the following conclusion:

“Most of the outage incidents were caused by power outages rather than direct fire damage. Direct fire damage only accounted for one per cent of outage incidents. This indicates that reliance on mains power does affect network resiliency.”

The document also observes that both copper and optical fibre networks flamed out during the fires, but that no evidence regarding their relative resilience is obvious.

Another observation offered started: “While underground infrastructure is generally more resilient to bushfires, it is not immune to damage.” ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like