Wanna force granny to take down that family photo from the internet? No problem. Europe's GDPR to the rescue

Grandchild Digital Picture Removal


A court in the Netherlands ruled this month that a grandmother must remove pictures of her grandchildren from her social media accounts after her daughter filed a privacy complaint.

The grandmother, according to a Gelderland District Court summary, has not been in contact with her daughter for more than a year due to a family argument.

Her daughter has three minor children who appear in pictures the grandmother posted to social media accounts on Facebook and Pinterest. In February, the daughter wrote to her mother, noting that her requests made via the police to remove the photos of her children from social media have been ignored and giving her mother until March 5 to comply or face legal action.

After the grandmother failed to take the photos down, the mother took her complaint to court.

The Dutch implementation of Europe's General Data Protection Act requires that anyone posting photos of minors obtain consent from their legal guardians.

When the court took up the matter in April, the grandmother had removed photos, except for one from Facebook. She wanted that one picture, of the grandson she had cared for from April 2012 through April 2019 while the boy and his father, separated from the mother, lived with her.

The father in the instance of the Facebook image also did not consent to the publication of the image.

Image copyright did not get considered in this case. Nor did the emotion considerations raised by the grandmother, as the summary filing says.

euros

EU've been naughty: GDPR has netted bloc €114m in fines since 2018

READ MORE

The case summary says that while GDPR exempts purely personal activity, it's not clear that postings to Facebook, with possible exposure to internet searches, qualify for that exemption.

Accordingly, the judge gave the grandmother ten days to remove the picture. If it isn't removed by then, a fine of €50.00 (£45, $55) will be imposed each day the images remain in place, up to a maximum of €1,000 (£900, $1,095).

In the US, where there's no overarching privacy framework like GDPR, photographers have fairly broad rights when it comes to taking pictures in public places and publishing them.

While there are some restrictions – Georgia, for example, has a law that forbids any photography of a minor by a registered sex offender without consent from the child's parents – a non-explicit photo of a minor taken where there's no expectation of privacy and published to social media or a news site without the parental permission would generally be legal under the First Amendment. ®


Keep Reading

Marketers for an Open Web ask UK competition watchdog to block launch of Google's anti-tracking Privacy Sandbox

Group claims adtech 'has nothing to do with privacy' but is rather an attempt 'to take control of the web'

EFF off: Privacy Badger disables by default anti-tracking safeguard that can be abused to track you online

Google has a word with digital rights warriors

Micropayments company Coil distributes new privacy policy with email that puts users' addresses in the ‘To:’ field

Hundreds of email addresses exposed, customers predictably less-than-thrilled

Reply-All storm flares as email announcing privacy policy puts 500 addresses in the 'To' field, not 'BCC'

Newsletter-as-a-service outfit Substack does the usual apologising

Apple: Yeah, about those ground-breaking privacy features in iOS 14 – don't expect them until next year

'Fundamental right to privacy' can wait – Facebook and others are annoyed

Apple wants privacy 'nutrition labels' on all new and updated apps in its software store from next month

How many grams of carbo-spy-drates are in your favorite applications?

Brave browser first to nix CNAME deception, the sneaky DNS trick used by marketers to duck privacy controls

Next release will block third-party trackers posing as first-party resources

Global Privacy Control emerges as latest attempt to let netizens choose whether they want to be tracked online

It's Do Not Track II: The Wrath of Ashkan and Sebastian... Caaaaaaaan't you stop stalking us around the internet

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020