If you bought a CRT monitor, TV 13+ years ago, hold on a little longer, there may be a small check for you

Price-fixing scandal case rumbles on and on, and on and on, and on and on

Nearly 13 years after the first court papers were submitted, a California class-action lawsuit over CRT monitor and TV pricing drags on.

Monday's appeal of an amended settlement plan marked the 5,733rd filing in the case between consumers and companies that built and sold the cathode ray tube screens between 1995 and 2007.

The brouhaha centers on allegations that a group of CRT manufacturers and vendors sought to artificially inflate CRT prices over the twelve-year span that marked the end of life for the technology. The manufacturers jacked up prices to stores and other makers, who in turn passed the cost along to consumers.

Among the defendants named in the original complaint [PDF], filed on November 26, 2007, were Hitachi, Toshiba, Philips, Samsung, and Matsushita. As with all class-action cases, a small group of named plaintiffs and their attorneys (mostly their attorneys) sought a massive payout that (after attorney fees) would be divided up between everyone who qualified, in this case people in the US who bought a CRT made by one of the factories in the specified period, and applied for compensation.

An old PC or terminal

Hey kids! Ditch that LCD and get ready for the retro CRT world of Windows Terminal


After what at the time felt like a long, drawn-out process, the two sides agreed on terms of a settlement in 2015. That deal included a $563m payout to the class, though it was never finalized.

Fast-forward five years to the present, and we still have the lawyers griping to the court in Oakland, California, over the finer points of the package. In this latest filing [PDF], attorneys argue over who gets the now-$513m settlement package.

The US federal district judge presiding in the case, Jon Tigar, has yet to rule. It is anyone's guess when the entire thing will be finalized.

Even then, at this point it's unclear how much of the money would actually make it to members of the class, nor do we have any idea how people will be able to show proof-of-purchase on a monitor or TV they bought 25 years ago.

Still, the lawyers should make out well. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022