Barmy ban on businesses, Brits based in Blighty bearing or buying .eu domains is back: Cut-off date is Jan 1, 2021

If you're not registered somewhere in the union, you can't use the TLD


Any Brit based in the UK, and not in the EU, will have their .eu domain taken away from them on January 1, 2021, according to the latest iteration of rules published by the TLD's operator EURid.

The revised fine-print was updated this week, and is the fourth attempt by Brussels' bureaucrats to show Brexiteers what’s what by taking away their .eu domains – even though the decision has already cut income to the registry and undermined its standing.

The rules have been repeatedly changed as the shambolic Brexit process wound its way through the British Parliament, with date changes and eligibility criteria revised multiple times. In October 2019, three months after Boris Johnson became Prime Minister, EURid put plans to take away .eu domains from people in Blighty on ice.

But with the possibility of a no-deal Brexit looming large, the issue has reared its ugly head yet again. The latest version of the dot-EU rules is at least coherent:

United Kingdom undertakings or organisations established in the United Kingdom but not in the Union, United Kingdom citizens who are not resident of a Union Member State, and United Kingdom residents who are not Union citizens will no longer be eligible to hold a .eu domain name.

So, any British citizen or company that is based in the UK will not be allowed to register a .eu domain from January 1, 2021 – the same date that any existing .eu domains held by Brits in the UK will be deemed ineligible and will be “withdrawn" and effectively removed from the internet; websites or email relying on the domains will not work.

One year after that, on January 1, 2022, any withdrawn domains will be released for general registration, effectively making them available to anyone in the European Union.

The withdrawal will not apply to any EU citizens based in the UK, or any UK citizens based in the EU, although all of them will be required to either prove their membership of the union or shift their registration address to somewhere in the European Union.

Easy enough to get around

There is also a significant loophole for anyone who values their .eu domain highly. They can set up in the EU and change their domain’s registration details to that address. If there is sufficient demand, it’s not hard to see how a variety of companies could set up a service to allow people to set up an EU address for little cost. But perhaps the bigger question: will anyone bother, especially when a .uk or .com address is highly recognizable.

And the even bigger question is: why bother to take .eu domains away at all? The decision to withdraw domains goes against a long tradition in the domain name world to leave existing domains be, in large part because it is never worth the hassle screwing around with them. A web address is still just a web address on the internet.

Clearly Europe's bureaucrats are convinced that a .eu domain is a significant benefit of being within the European Union; the reality, however, is that it is minimal, especially with the release of over a thousand new top-level domains in recent years.

Brits have so far voted with their feet: the number of .eu domains registered by UK residents has fallen by 46 per cent in the past year. In the second quarter of 2018, there were 304,133 UK-based .eu domain names; in October 2019, just 162,287. Those numbers will fall further as the expiration dates for individual domains come up between now and the end of the year, reducing the registry’s income by hundreds of thousands of euros.

The main beneficiary of the .eu registry business? The European Union itself. Only Brussels could invent a self-shooting gun. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Will this be one of the world's first RISC-V laptops?
    A sneak peek at a notebook that could be revealed this year

    Pic As Apple and Qualcomm push for more Arm adoption in the notebook space, we have come across a photo of what could become one of the world's first laptops to use the open-source RISC-V instruction set architecture.

    In an interview with The Register, Calista Redmond, CEO of RISC-V International, signaled we will see a RISC-V laptop revealed sometime this year as the ISA's governing body works to garner more financial and development support from large companies.

    It turns out Philipp Tomsich, chair of RISC-V International's software committee, dangled a photo of what could likely be the laptop in question earlier this month in front of RISC-V Week attendees in Paris.

    Continue reading
  • Did ID.me hoodwink Americans with IRS facial-recognition tech, senators ask
    Biz tells us: Won't someone please think of the ... fraud we've stopped

    Democrat senators want the FTC to investigate "evidence of deceptive statements" made by ID.me regarding the facial-recognition technology it controversially built for Uncle Sam.

    ID.me made headlines this year when the IRS said US taxpayers would have to enroll in the startup's facial-recognition system to access their tax records in the future. After a public backlash, the IRS reconsidered its plans, and said taxpayers could choose non-biometric methods to verify their identity with the agency online.

    Just before the IRS controversy, ID.me said it uses one-to-one face comparisons. "Our one-to-one face match is comparable to taking a selfie to unlock a smartphone. ID.me does not use one-to-many facial recognition, which is more complex and problematic. Further, privacy is core to our mission and we do not sell the personal information of our users," it said in January.

    Continue reading
  • Meet Wizard Spider, the multimillion-dollar gang behind Conti, Ryuk malware
    Russia-linked crime-as-a-service crew is rich, professional – and investing in R&D

    Analysis Wizard Spider, the Russia-linked crew behind high-profile malware Conti, Ryuk and Trickbot, has grown over the past five years into a multimillion-dollar organization that has built a corporate-like operating model, a year-long study has found.

    In a technical report this week, the folks at Prodaft, which has been tracking the cybercrime gang since 2021, outlined its own findings on Wizard Spider, supplemented by info that leaked about the Conti operation in February after the crooks publicly sided with Russia during the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    What Prodaft found was a gang sitting on assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars funneled from multiple sophisticated malware variants. Wizard Spider, we're told, runs as a business with a complex network of subgroups and teams that target specific types of software, and has associations with other well-known miscreants, including those behind REvil and Qbot (also known as Qakbot or Pinkslipbot).

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022