Boffins find that over nine out of ten 'ethical' hackers are being a bit naughty when it comes to cloud services

Then again, cloud providers aren't exactly playing the smart game either

Infosec pros and hackers regularly abuse cloud service providers to conduct reconnaissance and attacks, despite efforts by cloud providers to limit such activity.

In a recent research paper titled "Cloud as an Attack Platform" [PDF], five boffins from Texas Tech University – Moitrayee Chatterjee, Prerit Datta, Faranak Abri, Akbar Siami-Namin, and Keith Jones – describe a series of interviews they conducted with computer security pros attending the Black Hat and DEF CON conferences.

Of the 75 security professionals and hackers they spoke with as a part of a larger examination of attacker psychology, more than 93 per cent admitted to abusing cloud services to create attack environments and launch attacks.

"We observed that these professional hackers often employ common strategies to abuse the cloud platform for its resource-efficient features in order to remain stealthy and silent while probing target machines, collecting victim data, discovering vulnerabilities, and launching attacks," the paper explains.

"We did not collect any demographic data, so we can not tell apart an ethical hacker/pen-tester or malicious hackers," said Chatterjee, a doctoral candidate and corresponding author, in an email to The Register. "Moreover, at conferences like DEF CON, participants do not get a name tag, we all got a tag that says 'human.'"

Chatterjee said recruiting participants to answer questions was difficult because they were afraid of being subject to a social engineering attack. "Some of them even thought we were stealing biometric data when offered them a pen to scribble down their thoughts using some diagram," she said.

Those using cloud services for offensive operations, the researchers say, have a common pattern. They set up a Virtual Private Server (VPS) or a multi-hop Virtual Private Network (VPN) to communicate securely with virtual machines (VMs) and load them with the cybersecurity tools like NMap, Metasploit, and Wireshark so they can conduct offensive operations.

Though infrastructure-as-a-service providers try to avoid this through VM network quotas, or tools to secure accounts like AWS GuardDuty and Amazon Inspector, infosec pros can work around platform limitations.

Chatterjee said the interviewees mostly mentioned AWS, but added that Google Cloud Platform abuse has been documented too. These companies, she said, are aware that abuse happens but they don't sufficiently monitor basic accounts to stop it.

The Register asked AWS and Google for comment. A Google spokesperson pointed to the company's acceptable use policy for GCP. AWS did not respond but has a similar policy.

Staying under the radar

The boffins identified several common attack scenarios in a companion paper, "Launching Stealth Attacks using Cloud" [PDF].


Wakey-wakey! A quarter of IT pros only get 3-4 hours' kip – and you won't believe what's being touted as the 'solution'


It outlines attack scenarios like using cloud platforms for phishing, DDoS, password cracking, rogue services, and other operations like running command-and-control servers. It also covers setting up an example attack server using Oracle VirtualBox and Kali Linux.

Both papers are scheduled to appear at the IEEE Computer Society Signature Conference on Computers, Software and Application (COMPSAC 2020) in July.

The researchers suggest some ways cloud providers might deal with abuse more effectively. One involves better customer identity verification through background checks. The availability of websites offering fake credit card numbers, the researchers say, makes it easy to create cloud accounts anonymously.

They also suggest better tracking of network usage and more intelligent VM monitoring to detect suspicious accounts. Cloud providers, they say, can enforce the use of firewalls, encourage software updates on VMs to protect against vulnerabilities, and create trusted software repositories to limit the availability of attack tools on their platforms.

Such measures, however, would impose costs on cloud providers and might alienate customers if the oversight is too heavy-handed.

Akbar Siami-Namin, associate professor of computer science at Texas Tech University and a co-author of the two papers, told The Reg there are both technical and business challenges cloud providers need to deal with.

"Security and particularly addition of security controls to infrastructure means additional costs," he said. "It also negatively impacts the 'usability' of the underlying systems. In the cloud platform, since it is a distributed environment, it is super hard to define a solid fortress in order to prevent adversaries from abusing it."

He also pointed to the business challenges entailed by adding friction to the customer acquisition process.

"Individuals are less likely to try something on the cloud, if the cloud is asking for so much private information such as credit card, name, address, etc," he said. "Therefore, the cloud providers offer some sort of basic computation power as 'free' with the hope that the potential customers (individuals) become regular customers for their cloud platforms (a long range investment)."

Those who would abuse cloud systems, he said, take advantage of this goodwill gesture.

"The cloud providers are aware of this issue," Siami-Namin said. However, from a technical point of view, it is hard to make the system bullet-proof and protected from attacks and abuse. As pointed out in our papers, perhaps they need a more mature, resilient, and monitoring tracking system empowered with AI and automated detection to identify these abuses." ®

Other stories you might like

  • Meet Wizard Spider, the multimillion-dollar gang behind Conti, Ryuk malware
    Russia-linked crime-as-a-service crew is rich, professional – and investing in R&D

    Analysis Wizard Spider, the Russia-linked crew behind high-profile malware Conti, Ryuk and Trickbot, has grown over the past five years into a multimillion-dollar organization that has built a corporate-like operating model, a year-long study has found.

    In a technical report this week, the folks at Prodaft, which has been tracking the cybercrime gang since 2021, outlined its own findings on Wizard Spider, supplemented by info that leaked about the Conti operation in February after the crooks publicly sided with Russia during the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    What Prodaft found was a gang sitting on assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars funneled from multiple sophisticated malware variants. Wizard Spider, we're told, runs as a business with a complex network of subgroups and teams that target specific types of software, and has associations with other well-known miscreants, including those behind REvil and Qbot (also known as Qakbot or Pinkslipbot).

    Continue reading
  • Supreme Court urged to halt 'unconstitutional' Texas content-no-moderation law
    Everyone's entitled to a viewpoint but what's your viewpoint on what exactly is and isn't a viewpoint?

    A coalition of advocacy groups on Tuesday asked the US Supreme Court to block Texas' social media law HB 20 after the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week lifted a preliminary injunction that had kept it from taking effect.

    The Lone Star State law, which forbids large social media platforms from moderating content that's "lawful-but-awful," as advocacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology puts it, was approved last September by Governor Greg Abbott (R). It was immediately challenged in court and the judge hearing the case imposed a preliminary injunction, preventing the legislation from being enforced, on the basis that the trade groups opposing it – NetChoice and CCIA – were likely to prevail.

    But that injunction was lifted on appeal. That case continues to be litigated, but thanks to the Fifth Circuit, HB 20 can be enforced even as its constitutionality remains in dispute, hence the coalition's application [PDF] this month to the Supreme Court.

    Continue reading
  • How these crooks backdoor online shops and siphon victims' credit card info
    FBI and co blow lid off latest PHP tampering scam

    The FBI and its friends have warned businesses of crooks scraping people's credit-card details from tampered payment pages on compromised websites.

    It's an age-old problem: someone breaks into your online store and alters the code so that as your customers enter their info, copies of their data is siphoned to fraudsters to exploit. The Feds this week have detailed one such effort that reared its head lately.

    As early as September 2020, we're told, miscreants compromised at least one American company's vulnerable website from three IP addresses: 80[.]249.207.19, 80[.]82.64.211 and 80[.]249.206.197. The intruders modified the web script TempOrders.php in an attempt to inject malicious code into the checkout.php page.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022