The incumbent President of the United States of America ran now-banned Facebook ads loaded with Nazi references

We wanted flying cars and space travel for 2020 but instead we got re-runs of fascist propaganda


Facebook has removed online ads and posts by President Trump's reelection campaign for violating its rules prohibiting "organized hate," a step the ad biz has been reluctant to take.

The ads, which are said to have been circulating on Facebook since June 3, 2020, claimed that dangerous mobs of left-wing groups are running riot, and urged ad viewers to add their names to a marketing list and donate money to the Trump campaign.

According to Media Matters, the ads were revised on June 17, 2020, to include a red triangle symbol that was used by the Nazis to identify political prisoners in concentration camps. The watchdog group says the Trump campaign ran 88 of these ads yesterday.

The Anti-Defamation League identifies 88 as a hate symbol. It's used to refer to the eighth letter of the Latin alphabet, "H," which repeated twice can stand for "Heil Hitler." What's more, the first sentence in these ads is 14 words, also a white supremacist dogwhistle. Quite a coincidence it seems.

“We removed these posts and ads for violating our policy against organized hate," a Facebook spokesperson said in an email to The Register. "Our policy prohibits using a banned hate group's symbol to identify political prisoners without the context that condemns or discusses the symbol.”

This is the first time Trump campaign content has been removed as hate speech. Facebook has previously removed Trump ads for policy violations, such as violating its census interference policy, with Zuckerberg and President Trump apparently in close coordination over the matter.

But the ad biz hasn't been enthusiastic about applying its rules to political content, going so far as to give politicians a license to lie. Its policy states, "Posts and ads from politicians are generally not subjected to fact-checking."

CEO Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly defended this stance, which perhaps is not surprising given the amount Trump and his allies spend on Facebook to promote their agenda. Together, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and the Trump Make America Great Again Committee have spent over $18m on Facebook ads between January, 2020 and June 15, 2020, according to Facebook.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Staff in a huff, personal call with Trump, picking fights with Twitter, upsetting civil-rights groups – a week in the life of Facebook's Zuckerberg

READ MORE

Facebook has allowed Trump and other Republicans to run thousands of ads that have been criticized for fearmongering and falsehoods, alongside hundreds of ads making false claims about voter fraud.

But Facebook, perhaps, has been emboldened by Twitter's decision to flag Trump tweets, something the short message service had resisted until recently, or by Trump's executive order to look for ways to weaken Section 230 immunity for internet services and the subsequent action yesterday by the Justice Department and legislators to limit legal protections.

Slamming down on scraping

In a separate policy clampdown, Facebook on Thursday filed two lawsuits, one in the US and the other in Spain, against individuals alleged to be using unauthorized software in violation of the company's terms of service.

In a blog post, Jessica Romero, director of platform enforcement and litigation, for the data gathering biz, said the defendant in the US lawsuit, Mohammad Zaghar of Morocco, operated a data scraping website where Facebook users could enter their Facebook credentials and have the site collect data not normally available for download, such as the email address, mobile phone number, gender, and date of birth of "friends."

The complaint alleges Zaghar "collected the data by using self-compromised accounts and a computer program to control a network of computers or “bots,” which pretended to be an Android device connected to the official Facebook mobile app."

The harvested data, it's claimed, was stored at Zaghar's website massroot8.com. Such details are commonly used for marketing purposes, specifically lead generation, price competition, and e-commerce optimization.

The complaint against Zaghar accuses him of collecting approximately 5,500 Facebook users' login credentials between April 23, 2020 to May 6, 2020 and scraping data from those accounts. It also claims he has been engaged in such activities for years.

Such information was easily accessible to Facebook developers before the Cambridge Analytica scandal forced the ad biz to rethink programmatic access to its platform and data hoard.

The lawsuit in Spain accused MGP25 Cyberint Services and its founder of distributing software for generating fake "likes" and comments on Instagram.

Facebook declined to make a copy of the complaint filed in Spain available, stating that the lawsuit is not public and the court there does not make it available. ®

PS: More worries for Trump this week: a tell-all book by a former advisor this month claimed the President once said journalists should be "executed," didn't know Britain was a nuclear power, begged China's leaders for help getting reelected, and more.

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022