Australia to force Google and Facebook to pay for news and reveal algorithm changes before they whack web traffic

And is willing to fine them hundreds of millions if they don't play nice

Australian regulators have proposed to compel web giants to divulge forthcoming changes to the algorithms used to present content to users, and to submit to binding arbitration when publishers seek payment for their content.

The draft code, released today, suggests imposing the following "minimum requirements" on Facebook and Google:

  • Give news media businesses at least 28 days' notice of:
    • Algorithm changes likely to materially affect referral traffic to news;
    • Algorithm changes designed to affect ranking of news behind paywalls; and
    • Substantial changes to display and presentation of news, and advertising directly associated with news, on digital platform services;
  • Give news media businesses clear information about the nature and availability of user data collected through users' interactions with news on their services;
  • Publish proposals to appropriately recognise original news on their services;
  • Provide flexible user comment moderation tools for news media businesses; and
  • Allow news media businesses to prevent their news being included on any individual digital platform service.

The draft code also proposes that Australian news publishers can ask Google and Facebook to negotiate over payments for news and can do so either singly or collectively. If negotiations fail, a regulator-appointed arbitrator will make a decision about a payment plan after a final round of offer.

Australia's competition regulator said it chose this approach because it means publishers and web companies determine the value of news. An alternative idea of forcing web companies to pay money into a pool that would be shared with publishers was rejected on grounds it would see governments value news.

The code only applies to Google and Facebook, but publishers have the option of asking regulators to approach other web companies. Australian authorities want the option to add other companies to the code, too.

Proposed penalties for breaking the code could reach AU$10m or ten percent of a web company’s local turnover from the last twelve months. Google and Facebook win many hundreds of millions in local sales, so fines could hit nine figures.

Before you ask: The Register would not be eligible for payments under the plan. We're reporting the news because few other nations have gone down this road, but publishers in many countries have beef with the way their content is used by web giants at a time when advertising revenue is hard to find. Australia's plan is also notable because the nation took a leading role in forming international consensus about rules requiring web platforms to swiftly remove repugnant acts like the 2019 live-streamed mass murders in New Zealand, and succeeded in creating international consensus.

Google has already argued against Australia's plans, saying the traffic it sends to publishers is sufficiently valuable and it doesn't make much from indexing news content. Facebook has shown some willingness to share details of its algorithms.

Australia hopes the code means more money flows to publishers and that they spend that cash on public interest journalism. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021