Intel, Apple, Cisco, Google sue US Patent Office – Tech police, open up!

Silicon Valley heavyweights demand access to review boards that can shoot down trolls just ahead of trial


Intel is leading an effort to force the US Patent and Trademark Office to axe a new rule said to favor litigious patent trolls.

The USPTO manages Inter Partes Review (IPR) panels that can be asked to assess granted patents and decide whether to throw them out on the grounds they should never have been approved in the first place. The review boards were introduced with the 2011 America Innovates Act, and their decisions can bring legal fights to fairly swift conclusions.

For example, if a patent troll was suing you for infringement, you could ask a panel – typically made up of a few patent trial and appeals judges – to review the troll's patents in hope of having them invalidated. If that were to happen, the troll's case against you would fall apart. This discourages trolls – holding companies that hoard intellectual property – from filing infringement claims to extract fees from victims.

However, Chipzilla, together with fellow tech heavies Cisco, Apple, and Google, are this week suing [PDF] USPTO Director Andrei Iancu in a San Jose federal district court to prevent him from enforcing a newly created rule limiting the use of IPR panels.

Under that rule, these IPR requests cannot be made just before or during a trial, with the reasoning that the panel system was designed to be an alternative to court battles over infringement and not something to happen alongside it. This clampdown has led to more IPR requests being denied, and more cases having to go to trial or settled out of court. And the tech goliaths, not liking this situation, want the restrictions scrapped.

"Over the past twelve months, the number of discretionary denials under the new rule, denying access to inter parties review without regard to a petition’s likelihood of success on the merits, has more than doubled," Benjamin Ostapuk, Intel veep and director of its intellectual property legal group, explained.

"Recently, the denial of access to the IPR process is becoming customary as the PTAB leaves suspect patent claims in force by declining to review them based on vague discretionary factors and asserting that those denials are not even subject to judicial review."

trolls

IBM, Microsoft and Linux Foundation link arms to fight patent trolls with 'multimillion' scheme

READ MORE

The USPTO told The Register it has no comment on the matter.

With fewer IPR challenges being accepted, Intel argued, the patent trolls are emboldened to once again lob dubious infringement claims at the processor designer and other big biz in hope of a quick settlement payout.

Ostapuk said the loss of access to the IPR process and the resurgence in infringement claims are not a coincidence.

"An almost immediate result of this behavior by the PTAB is patent litigation rising to levels not seen in nearly a decade," the Intel VP argued.

"Additionally, the number of those lawsuits being filed by patent licensing entities, meaning entities that do not manufacture products but purchase patents only to sue and tax successful operating companies like Intel, is exploding."

The four companies are now pushing to have the rule thrown out by the court in hopes that it will lead to more IPR claims being granted and fewer patent troll suits. ®


Other stories you might like

  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading
  • Meta hires network chip guru from Intel: What does this mean for future silicon?
    Why be a customer when you can develop your own custom semiconductors

    Analysis Here's something that should raise eyebrows in the datacenter world: Facebook parent company Meta has hired a veteran networking chip engineer from Intel to lead silicon design efforts in the internet giant's infrastructure hardware engineering group.

    Jon Dama started as director of silicon in May for Meta's infrastructure hardware group, a role that has him "responsible for several design teams innovating the datacenter for scale," according to his LinkedIn profile. In a blurb, Dama indicated that a team is already in place at Meta, and he hopes to "scale the next several doublings of data processing" with them.

    Though we couldn't confirm it, we think it's likely that Dama is reporting to Alexis Bjorlin, Meta's vice president of infrastructure hardware who previously worked with Dama when she was general manager of Intel's Connectivity group before serving a two-year stint at Broadcom.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022