Intel, Apple, Cisco, Google sue US Patent Office – Tech police, open up!

Silicon Valley heavyweights demand access to review boards that can shoot down trolls just ahead of trial


Intel is leading an effort to force the US Patent and Trademark Office to axe a new rule said to favor litigious patent trolls.

The USPTO manages Inter Partes Review (IPR) panels that can be asked to assess granted patents and decide whether to throw them out on the grounds they should never have been approved in the first place. The review boards were introduced with the 2011 America Innovates Act, and their decisions can bring legal fights to fairly swift conclusions.

For example, if a patent troll was suing you for infringement, you could ask a panel – typically made up of a few patent trial and appeals judges – to review the troll's patents in hope of having them invalidated. If that were to happen, the troll's case against you would fall apart. This discourages trolls – holding companies that hoard intellectual property – from filing infringement claims to extract fees from victims.

However, Chipzilla, together with fellow tech heavies Cisco, Apple, and Google, are this week suing [PDF] USPTO Director Andrei Iancu in a San Jose federal district court to prevent him from enforcing a newly created rule limiting the use of IPR panels.

Under that rule, these IPR requests cannot be made just before or during a trial, with the reasoning that the panel system was designed to be an alternative to court battles over infringement and not something to happen alongside it. This clampdown has led to more IPR requests being denied, and more cases having to go to trial or settled out of court. And the tech goliaths, not liking this situation, want the restrictions scrapped.

"Over the past twelve months, the number of discretionary denials under the new rule, denying access to inter parties review without regard to a petition’s likelihood of success on the merits, has more than doubled," Benjamin Ostapuk, Intel veep and director of its intellectual property legal group, explained.

"Recently, the denial of access to the IPR process is becoming customary as the PTAB leaves suspect patent claims in force by declining to review them based on vague discretionary factors and asserting that those denials are not even subject to judicial review."

trolls

IBM, Microsoft and Linux Foundation link arms to fight patent trolls with 'multimillion' scheme

READ MORE

The USPTO told The Register it has no comment on the matter.

With fewer IPR challenges being accepted, Intel argued, the patent trolls are emboldened to once again lob dubious infringement claims at the processor designer and other big biz in hope of a quick settlement payout.

Ostapuk said the loss of access to the IPR process and the resurgence in infringement claims are not a coincidence.

"An almost immediate result of this behavior by the PTAB is patent litigation rising to levels not seen in nearly a decade," the Intel VP argued.

"Additionally, the number of those lawsuits being filed by patent licensing entities, meaning entities that do not manufacture products but purchase patents only to sue and tax successful operating companies like Intel, is exploding."

The four companies are now pushing to have the rule thrown out by the court in hopes that it will lead to more IPR claims being granted and fewer patent troll suits. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021