Apple: Yeah, about those ground-breaking privacy features in iOS 14 – don't expect them until next year

'Fundamental right to privacy' can wait – Facebook and others are annoyed

Apple has delayed a rule change that requires apps on iOS 14, iPadOS 14, and tvOS 14 to request permission from the user before tracking them via a unique ID number.

Specifically, Apple will not, for now, require apps to explicitly ask for permission before utilizing its Identifier for Advertisers, or IDFA, to track people's activities.

The biz's decision to hold off implementing the promised privacy feature comes a week after Facebook warned that Apple's planned IDFA permission prompt may hinder the ability of advertisers to generate ad revenue using the antisocial network's Audience Network service.

Apple has also reportedly discussed the impact of its rule change on major app publishers like Activision Blizzard and Tencent's Supercell.

For developers, this means Apple's AppTrackingTransparency framework will be available for implementation but not immediately required. The company's requirement that App Store product pages present a summary of self-reported privacy practices later this year remains unchanged.

In a statement emailed to The Register, an Apple spokesperson explained the delay as a courtesy to affected app makers. "We want to give developers the time they need to make the necessary changes, and as a result, the requirement to use this tracking permission will go into effect early next year," a company spokesperson said.

Apple's spokesperson reiterated the company's commitment to privacy, noting that the technical changes, when enabled, will present app users with a system prompt through which they can choose to allow or reject ad tracking on an app-by-app basis.

“We believe technology should protect users’ fundamental right to privacy, and that means giving users tools to understand which apps and websites may be sharing their data with other companies for advertising or advertising measurement purposes, as well as the tools to revoke permission for this tracking," Apple's spokesperson said.


Facebook apologizes to users, businesses for Apple’s monstrous efforts to protect its customers' privacy


The IDFA is a unique identifier generated on Apple devices as an alternative to the device-linked Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) that was used by makers of ad-oriented apps for tracking until iOS 5. IDFAs were intended to allow advertisers to track users, ostensibly without revealing personal information, to make ad campaign measurement better.

The advantage of an IDFA over UUIDs from a privacy perspective is that the IDFA can be reset and constrained through the "Limit Ad Tracking" setting.

What has advertisers worried is that in the forthcoming iOS 14, iPadOS 14, and tvOS 14 releases, Apple's permission model transitions from opt-out to opt-in. It seems ad firms doubt that app users will choose to be tracked.

Apple's recalibration of its privacy zeal demonstrates that money talks, specifically the $100bn+ mobile ad market. The iPhone maker's climbdown echoes Google's recent hedging that maybe, just maybe, it may not get rid of third-party cookies by 2022 as planned. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading
  • Utility biz Delta-Montrose Electric Association loses billing capability and two decades of records after cyber attack

    All together now - R, A, N, S, O...

    A US utility company based in Colorado was hit by a ransomware attack in November that wiped out two decades' worth of records and knocked out billing systems that won't be restored until next week at the earliest.

    The attack was detailed by the Delta-Montrose Electric Association (DMEA) in a post on its website explaining that current customers won't be penalised for being unable to pay their bills because of the incident.

    "We are a victim of a malicious cyber security attack. In the middle of an investigation, that is as far as I’m willing to go," DMEA chief exec Alyssa Clemsen Roberts told a public board meeting, as reported by a local paper.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021