Adidas now stands for All Day I'm Disconnecting All Servers as owners of 'smart' Libra scales furious over bricked kit

You can only use it to weigh yourself now... how disgustingly low-tech

In 2015, German sportswear manufacturer Adidas acquired a plucky Austrian IoT startup called Runtastic, which, among other things, manufactured a $129.99 "smart" scale called Libra. Now that product is being discontinued, preventing owners from synchronising their data or even downloading the app required to use it.

In a post published yesterday, Adidas announced the discontinuation of key functionality from the Libra smart scale.

"We wanted to let you know that we've decided to stop supporting the Libra app. This means that we've taken the app off the market and that login won't work anymore," the company said. "A login and the synchronisation of your weight data from the Libra scale is no longer possible."

Owners can still see how much timber they've put on during lockdown by glancing at the Libra's LCD screen, much like they could with an ordinary £10 scale from Tesco. However, the core functionality that initially attracted them to the product is long gone.

While the Libra app is no longer searchable on the Google Play Store and Apple App Store, those who have previously downloaded it are able to visit its page, where they can still leave "feedback". Predictably, this has prompted a flood of one-star reviews and furious comments.

El Reg has contacted Adidas for comment.

Users of Libra are not alone in having their expensive IoT kit discontinued after just a few years of ownership.

In April 2016, the servers supporting a smart home hub product called Revolv were shut down, leaving owners unable to control their other Wi-Fi-connected gizmos. This stung for a couple of reasons: firstly, the hub cost £210 and was explicitly sold with a "lifetime subscription". Secondly, Revolv wasn't a fledgling startup with tenuous cash flow, but rather a subsidiary of Alphabet – one of the largest and wealthiest companies on the planet.

Another shocking example comes from last year, when Den Automation, a crowdfunding sensation that raised $4.5m in equity crowdfunding for a family of smart plugs and light switches, entered administration. As it found itself unable to pay for server costs, people suddenly found themselves burdened with non-functional and hugely expensive kit.

The assets and intellectual property of Den Automation were subsequently acquired by a previous investor through a new company called Den Switches, which has said it intends to restart the service. It's not clear when that will happen.

More recently, the startup Wink sent out an email to users of its smart home products demanding they pay for a subscription service in order to continue using their products as the revenue obtained from one-time purchases of its equipment proved insufficient to support long-term maintenance.

The problem with most IoT products isn't necessarily that they rely on back-end servers to run. It's that, for the most part, it's impossible to perceive the trajectory of a given company. Will they be acquired by new owners with aggressive cost-cutting strategies and leaner product roadmaps?

Or will they financially struggle, eventually swirling the toilet basin of insolvency, and leave nothing behind but a bunch of electronic waste and angry one-star app reviews? ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022