Big Telco freaks out as unknown operator with great political connections vies for valuable 5G space in America

The swamp is full to the brim as usual in Washington DC, it seems

Analysis The powerful US telco lobby has come out fighting against an outsider and its efforts to snaffle tens of billions of dollars worth of much-needed 5G spectrum.

In what appears to be the end-game to a two-year effort to make a fortune by grabbing bandwidth currently assigned to the Department of Defence and use it for commercial 5G efforts, unknown company Rivada Networks is reportedly close to winning a contract from the Pentagon to lease a huge slice of mid-band spectrum to build a new national 5G network in the States.

Telcos are furious, with both AT&T and industry group CTIA publishing blog posts this week condemning the approach. AT&T’s head of regulatory relations, Joan Marsh, has called the idea “drastic and unproven” and CTIA head Meredith Attwell Baker “a radical departure.”

The issue has even hit the mainstream news, with CNN digging into the usual dry and comparatively uninteresting topic of spectrum management and claiming cronyism.

There is certainly something unusual going on. A series of out-of-the-ordinary processes and decisions have surrounded the valuable spectrum since 2018, including persistent suggestions from the White House that it may be a good idea to nationalize 5G, rather than leave it to the free market. The issue has grown murkier with the involvement of a number of high-powered Republican lobbyists and former Congressmen.

Two businessmen facing each other shouting into loudhailers

America’s 5G efforts get shot in the arm with mid-band spectrum free-up


According to the chair of the US House Energy and Commerce Committee's Communication and Technology panel, those men include: former deputy chief of staff and senior advisor to President George W Bush, Karl Rove; former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich; controversial tech billionaire Peter Thiel; and former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale.

But Rivada – a completely unknown and privately held company – has denied in the strongest terms claims it is on the cusp of bagging a sweetheart deal for the valuable spectrum – specifically, the assertion it will land a no-bid contract for the frequencies.

"The story is a steaming pile of BS," its spokesperson told The Reg. "We have always and consistently advocated for a competitive process to determine the best way to share DoD spectrum between commercial and government use."

Rivada CEO Declan Ganley also took to Twitter to mock reports of a no-bid deal: "Just watched a hilarious CNN report claiming that the White House wants to 'fast track a contract for Rivada without a competitive process' (a lie). And that it would be 'the biggest hand off of economic power to a single entity in history.' Who owns CNN? That's right, AT&T."

With tens of billions of dollars at stake, Washington's culture of backroom deals, heavy spin, media leaks, and aggressive denunciations is in full effect.


The 5G nationalization idea first appeared in January 2018, and we wrote about how pretty much everyone from Big Cable to the FCC to the Department of Commerce’s NTIA arm was bitterly opposed to the idea. But for some reason, it kept reemerging as a proposal with the White House repeatedly expressing support for it.

At the heart of the issue is a drastic shortage of bandwidth that is needed to roll out next-generation 5G networks in America. The need is such that all arms of the US government unusually agreed to free up unused spectrum to make 5G possible, which led to an announcement in September that the US military was going to make over 100MHz of contiguous mid-band spectrum, in the 3450-3550 MHz band, available for 5G within months.

The announcement sparked surprise, not least because of how quickly agreement had been reached: we praised it as “a rare example of the Trump Administration using pressure tactics in a constructive, rather than destructive way.”

We should have known better, because within weeks, rather than simply agree to make the spectrum available via auction, which has been the system used for decades, the Pentagon issued a “request for information” in which it sought “insight into innovative solutions and technologies for dynamic sharing of the department’s current spectrum allocation.”

That may sound inoffensive, yet it immediately raised the hackles of the mobile industry, which wanted to know why the Pentagon was looking at creating an entirely new process rather than go with the FCC’s longstanding approach for spectrum distribution.

Suspicions high

Lawmakers were also on the case. “We have heard reports that the suddenness of this request and the short turnaround timeframe have been prompted directly by senior White House Officials,” a letter from the chairs of the House’s Energy and Commerce Committee and Communication and Technology Subcommittee to the US government at the start of October read.

The letter listed the Republican operatives above and their connection to “a specific company, Rivada, Inc, which has long championed a national network that Rivada would construct and operate using its sharing technology.”

Rivada is a largely unknown entity. It is privately held with no track record in the industry and has repeatedly pitched for government telco contracts. A main investor is Peter Thiel, who has strong connections with the defense department through his controversial Palantir data company.

In 2017, Rivada went for the $6.5bn contract to run FirstNet, a national safety network, but lost out to AT&T, in large part because it didn’t have any expertise or business other than bidding for the contract. Rivada appealed the decision. It was rejected.

Then came the unexpected White House-slash-Dept-of-Defense announcement that it would free up 100MHz of spectrum, a massively valuable asset, followed by the even more unexpected decision to ask for ideas on how to allocate it, something that industry analysts said stemmed from the White House, not the Pentagon. One high-profile analyst, Craig Moffett, told CNN the whole thing “smacks of cronyism at best and reeks of 'the swamp' at worst.”

In recent days, rumors started swirling that the Pentagon, pushed by the White House, is about to announce a no-bid contract process for an even larger slice of spectrum – a massive 350MHz worth more than $20bn – and that the recipient will be Rivada. And that’s when all hell broke loose.

Rivada denies the existence of any such special deal, though it very much is interested in acquiring the rights to wireless spectrum. Its spokespeople were also dismissive of the traditional spectrum auction approach in a statement to The Register, claiming it has "become a barrier to entry rather than a facilitator of it." ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022