Shock news: NASA lunar ambitions might be a bit too... ambitious

'We believe the Agency will be hard-pressed to land astronauts on the Moon by the end of 2024'


The NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) has said the chances of the agency meeting the goal of landing humans on the Moon by 2024 are looking ever slimmer.

"We believe the Agency will be hard-pressed to land astronauts on the Moon by the end of 2024," said the OIG in a report (PDF) filed yesterday on the management and performance challenges faced by NASA.

Technical hurdles aside, even getting close to that goal "will require strong, consistent, sustained leadership from the President, Congress, and NASA, as well as stable and timely funding."

It's fair to say that 2020 has not been kind, and the ongoing fall-out from the recent US election is very much the extra toppings on a turd sandwich for anyone seeking "strong, consistent, sustained leadership" from those in charge.

The Artemis project is an easy target. The rocket NASA is to use, the Space Launch System (SLS), has had its first test flight delayed yet again, to 2021, and work on the monster rocket was delayed or halted as the agency closed facilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Plans for the Human Landing System to send astronauts to the lunar surface remain in flux and NASA has yet to make final decisions on components such as the Gateway station, the first elements of which are set for a January 2024 launch.

And then there is the thorny issue of money. The OIG noted that NASA will soon pass $17bn in SLS spending and budget-busting has continued with the Orion capsule and ground systems to support the program.

Sounding a little like a broken record, the OIG intoned: "NASA must determine the true long-term costs of its human exploration programs, set realistic schedules, define system requirements and mission planning, form or firm up international partnerships, and leverage commercial space capabilities."

For the latter two points, progress has been made with the Artemis Accords, and the European Space Agency (ESA) is making a substantial contribution to both the Gateway and Orion (in the form of the ATV-derived service module) and companies such as SpaceX will be contributing launch capabilities.

However, NASA does remain determined to use the SLS. A congressional mandate requires the agency to use the monster rocket for its Europa Clipper mission, although bets are being hedged as "the Clipper team is developing the spacecraft to accommodate the differing launch and flight capabilities of the SLS and a commercial launch vehicle," according to the OIG.

Indeed, in its FY2021 request, a proposal was made to switch out the SLS for a commercial vehicle, which would see a 2024 launch and savings of over $1.5bn.

The OIG also called out other areas including NASA's management of major projects, noting the agency's "culture of optimism and the positive and negative effects this has had on project management," the ongoing challenge of sustaining a human presence in Low Earth Orbit, and the ageing infrastructure and facilities relied upon by the agency.

The goal of returning astronauts to the Moon by 2024 was set by the White House in March 2019. 2021's incumbent may have different priorities. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022