In this week’s episode of Texas Attorney General: Google faces lawsuit accusing it of crushing ad-tech rivals

Antitrust legal challenge also claims web giant accessed encrypted WhatsApp messages

Google is set to be at the end of another antitrust lawsuit, with Texas’ Attorney General Ken Paxton announcing on Wednesday he will sue the internet giant for damaging competition in the ad-tech market.

Somewhat unusually, the allegations were made via a slick video that looked like a trailer to a reality TV show. A press release followed later along with a copy of the complaint [PDF] expected to be filed against the Silicon Valley titan.

Following in the Trumpian reality show theme, the video was shared via Twitter, with equally attention-grabbing language: “#BREAKING: Texas takes the lead once more! Today, we’re filing a lawsuit against #Google for anticompetitive conduct,” and: “This internet Goliath used its power to manipulate the market, destroy competition, and harm YOU, the consumer. Stay tuned…”

The announcement is just the latest in a blitz of high-profile news emanating from Paxton’s office. In the past week, he sued Facebook, along with much of the rest of the United States, alleging illegal anti-competitive behavior. The attorney general also unsuccessfully [PDF] sued political battleground US states for “unconstitutional changes” to election laws – yes, that’s right, Paxton is on the Trump train when it comes to trying and failing to reverse the result of November's presidential election because the wrong person seemingly won.

Is Google fudging search rankings to benefit pages that embed YouTube vids? Or is this just another ‘bug’?


What’s behind the attention-seeking behavior? Critics suggest it may have something to do with the fact that Paxton is under investigation by the FBI after two of his top aides filed separate whistleblower complaints against him for allegedly using his office to benefit a political donor and friend, real estate investor Nate Paul.

In addition, Paxton has been under indictment for an extraordinary five years on securities fraud charges. The case has been strung out for so long so, The Texas Tribune has even created a timeline to explain how it has managed to carry on this way.

Bear this in mind when you get to, say, section 141 in today's complaint, which states Google struck a deal with Facebook in 2015 to secretly access people's end-to-end encrypted WhatsApp messages and files:

Page from Google lawsuit brought by Texas AG

From the lawsuit paperwork ... Click to enlarge

However – and far be it from us to defend Google – WhatsApp didn't complete its implementation of end-to-end encryption until 2016. And what the lawsuit describes sounds exactly like the chat app's publicly documented opt-in Google Drive backup feature as opposed to a hidden backdoor to data.

On more concrete ground, according to the flashy video trailer, Google used its market power to rig ad auctions and so drive up pricing. In the followup announcement, Paxton claimed:

Google is a trillion-dollar monopoly brazenly abusing its monopolistic power, going so far as to induce senior Facebook executives to agree to a contractual scheme that undermines the heart of competitive process. In this advertising monopoly on an electronically traded market, Google is essentially trading on ‘insider information’ by acting as the pitcher, catcher, batter and umpire, all at the same time. This isn’t the ‘free market’ at work here. This is anti-market and illegal under state and federal law.

Google’s monopolization of the display-advertising industry and its misleading business practices stifle innovation, limit consumer choice and reduce competition.

Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Utah – all states with a Republican Attorney General, like Paxton – are listed on the complaint along with Texas.

This legal challenge follows the US federal government's sueball lobbed at Google in October, which claimed the biz abused its position of dominance and damaged competition. And on Thursday, the search kingpin will be sued by 30 US states for unfairly favoring its own products in web results, it is rumored. ®

Other stories you might like

  • We can unify HPC and AI software environments, just not at the source code level

    Compute graphs are the way forward

    Register Debate Welcome to the latest Register Debate in which writers discuss technology topics, and you the reader choose the winning argument. The format is simple: we propose a motion, the arguments for the motion will run this Monday and Wednesday, and the arguments against on Tuesday and Thursday. During the week you can cast your vote on which side you support using the poll embedded below, choosing whether you're in favour or against the motion. The final score will be announced on Friday, revealing whether the for or against argument was most popular.

    This week's motion is: A unified, agnostic software environment can be achieved. We debate the question: can the industry ever have a truly open, unified, agnostic software environment in HPC and AI that can span multiple kinds of compute engines?

    Arguing today FOR the motion is Rob Farber, a global technology consultant and author with an extensive background in HPC and in developing machine-learning technology that he applies at national laboratories and commercial organizations. Rob can be reached at

    Continue reading
  • But why that VPN? How WireGuard made it into Linux

    Even the best of ideas can take their own sweet time making it into the kernel

    Maybe someday – maybe – Zero Trust will solve many of our network security problems. But for now, if you want to make sure you don't have an eavesdropper on your network, you need a Virtual Private Network (VPN).

    There's only one little problem with commercial VPNs: many of them are untrustworthy. So, what can you do? Well, run your own of course is the open-source answer. And, today, your VPN of choice is Linux's built-in VPN: WireGuard.

    Why WireGuard rather than OpenVPN or IKEv2? Because it's simpler to implement while maintaining security and delivering faster speeds. And, when it comes to VPNs, it's all about balancing speed and security.

    Continue reading
  • Boffins demonstrate a different kind of floppy disk: A legless robot that hops along a surface

    This is fine

    Those of us who fear future enslavement by robot overlords may have one more reason not to sleep at night: engineers have demonstrated a few of the legless, floppy variety making some serious leaps.

    Animated pancake-like droids have demonstrated their ability to execute a series of flops in a fashion their creators – soft robotics engineers based in China – describe as "rapid, continuous, and steered jumping."

    "Jumping is an important locomotion function to extend navigation range, overcome obstacles, and adapt to unstructured environments," Rui Chen of Chongqing University and Huayan Pu of Shanghai University said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021