Google rejects Australia’s revised pay-for-news plan, proposes its own plan instead

Shows why it irks politicians by putting a link to its argument on home page

Google has rejected Australia’s plan to force it to pay local news publishers for the right to index their output and present it in search results.

The search and ad giant’s rejection came in a post penned by Google’s veep for Australia and New Zealand Mel Silva, who argued that Australia’s proposal “has serious problems that need to be worked through.”

Google is not happy with the change to requirements for algorithm disclosures, which was altered so that only major changes initiated by humans would be reported to publishers. Silva says Google just can’t do that and attempting to do so would “delay important updates, drive up operating costs, and mandate special treatment to news publishers in a way that would disadvantage everyone else.”

That last bit is a little naughty by generalizing about algorithmic updates when the legislation only calls for algorithm changes that impact news publishers to be disclosed. But Google says even with the focus on news-related changes it would have to offer thousands of notifications each year and that doing so is impractical.

Shocking news

Australia mostly sticks to its guns in final plan to make Google and Facebook pay news publishers


Silva also argues that no search engine anywhere pays to generate links and that Australia’s plan could therefore “unravel the key principles of the open internet people use every day”.

Australian federal treasurer Josh Frydenberg has said the nation is willing to pioneer such a scheme and that the world is looking on with interest.

Silva also objects to the compulsory arbitration model Australia proposes, as it "incentivises publishers to make ambit claims and resort to arbitration rather than good-faith negotiations; assumes that the internet has never required payments for links because of ‘bargaining imbalance’; and requires the decision-maker to choose a single ‘final offer’".

Australia’s communications minister Paul Fletcher has previously rebutted that argument by saying the proposed arbitration model is widely used in the nation’s telecoms sector.

Silva says Google is willing to pay Australian publishers on its own terms, under the Google News Showcase programme. That programme has a total of US$1bn in funding, but Google has not introduced it to Australia while it waits for the nation’s pay-for-news plan to become law.

The veep thinks that a new arbitration model, combined with News Showcase, could be acceptable if it “would let arbitrators look at comparable transactions, rather than just looking at only one side’s costs.”

Again, that’s a little naughty as Australia’s added a provision that allows bargaining between Google and publishers to consider the value that search traffic provides. But Google thinks those provisions allow publishers to bargain on the basis that if its search engine disappeared, they would still get the same value, and therefore thinks the mechanism isn't workable.

Silva’s post ends by saying that if Australia’s government makes “the practical changes we’ve outlined,” the company believes “there is a path forward.”

And to make sure Australians get the message, the company’s mobile and desktop search engine is already displaying the following on

Google Australia news code alert

Google’s alert for Australian users. Click to enlarge

The Register is far from the first organisation to point out that Google’s willingness to put its message in the face of its millions of Australian users shows the very power that the nation’s government wishes to curtail.

Google Australia links to open letter opposing pay-for-news code

Australian regulator slams Google ‘misinformation’ in pay-for-news-fight


Australian politics and media mostly hibernate from about now until the last week of January, save for coverage of sport and natural disasters. And the bill has been sent to a committee that will not meet this year and has not published a schedule of meetings for 2021.

Google could try to flood Australia’s media with its message in that vacuum, but this fight will likely resume in earnest next year, not least because Facebook is yet to reveal its attitude to the bill. ®


The Register is not eligible to receive payment under Australia's plan and reports this story as it is potentially a global precedent for how publishers and web giants interact.

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022