New York Stock Exchange bins China’s three biggest telcos

As China launches Alibaba antitrust probe, warns Tencent, and the clock keeps TikTok-ing for Oracle


The Register’s writers and readers may have taken a few days off, but the US/China trade war rumbled on regardless. So let’s get caught up, shall we?

The big item in the break was the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announcing [PDF] that it would de-list China’s big three telcos: China Telecom, China Unicom, and China Mobile.

The Exchange said it was doing so to comply with US president Donald Trump’s November 2020 executive order that included the three carriers on a list of Chinese companies in which the USA prohibits local investment.

The NYSE will therefore handle trades on January 7th and 8th, 2021, but then suspend trading from January 11th.

On Monday January 4th, the three telcos issued a statement* acknowledging the NYSE’s decision, but also saying they have “not received any written notification from the NYSE on its decision to delist”.

The statements – all filed with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange – also point out that the shares traded on the NYSE represent a small fraction of their total scrip and trading volumes. Which isn’t quite laughing off the situation – because the statements all warn investors to be wary – but does point out that the NYSE isn’t entirely necessary to investors in the three carriers.

China surveillance

Alibaba admits it built facial-recognition-as-a-service to detect oppressed Uyghur minority in China

READ MORE

The three carriers are state-controlled and are the only companies allowed to offer telecoms services in the Middle Kingdom. The USA alleges they’re therefore tangled up with China’s military and wider efforts to compete forcefully, and perhaps not fairly, with global rivals.

China’s financial services market is less tightly-controlled by Beijing, which is one reason Alibaba waded into the field with loan products that didn’t always require borrowers to provide collateral. China’s financial regulators saw those instruments as so risky they stopped the super-colossal IPO of Alibaba’s finance business , the Ant Group.

In the shadow of Christmas, Chinese authorities took more action against Alibaba. The People’s Bank of China announced its intention to “supervise and guide” Ant Group and its products. And the nation’s State Administration for Market Regulation weighed in with a probe into whether Alibaba’s web store was behaving as a monopolist by denying rivals access to its platform.

Alibaba’s charismatic and super-famous founder Jack Ma was nowhere to be seen as those announcements were made. He was even replaced as a judge on a reality show that awards prizes from the Jack Ma Foundation. That’s led to plenty of speculation he’s been politely told to stay shtum after his initial reaction to the Ant Group IPO cancellation was perceived as criticism of the party line.

Alibaba said it will co-operate with the antitrust probe.

At least the company is not alone among Chinese tech giants in feeling the glare of regulators: three days before Christmas the State Administration for Market Regulation also put Tencent and mega e-tailer JD.com on notice at an “an administrative guidance meeting” that raised government concerns about group buying schemes selling products at below cost to grow market share.

Back in the USA, meanwhile, the Trump administration’s deadline to approve the planned sale of TikTok to local investors including Oracle has again passed without the app being banned. However, the administration has appealed the case brought by three TikTok users who successfully argued that banning the app was an unfair denial of access to a tool they use to make their livings.

no

TikTok says Trump administration ban is based on fake news about the app and its back end

READ MORE

All of which leaves much uncertainty. Investors in Chinese telcos who want to hang onto their shares await advice on how to trade their scrip. The TikTok deal remains unresolved and the incoming Biden administration’s policy regarding the app is unclear. As is China’s attitude to its web giants. While the Middle Kingdom has curbed their retail operations, it remains to be seen if its attitude will change to their sprawling social media, entertainment, and cloud operations.

And all the news above happened during a time without news of note about Huawei, the most controversial Chinese company of them all. ®

*China Unicom statement [PDF], China Mobile statement [PDF], China Telecom statement [PDF].


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022