Be careful where you log into GitHub: Dev visits Iran, opens laptop, gets startup's entire account shut down

Service restored, code silo gets license to serve Iranian programmers

On Tuesday, startup service firm Pure Labs regained access to its GitHub account, which had been shut down since December 30 for an apparent breach of Iranian sanctions.

The reason that the biz, based in Germany, lost access, according to co-founder Sebastian Slomski, was "one employee opened his laptop while visiting his parents in Iran."

That network interaction proved enough to convince Microsoft's GitHub that it had to ban Pure Labs' account to comply with US trade sanctions on Iran.

GitHub's disclosures about how it complies with sanctions raise the possibility that visiting a country subject to trade controls may affect account status.

"Travel in these regions may impact your account status, but availability may be reinstated once you are outside of the sanctioned region and upon submitting a successful individual account appeals request or an organizational account appeals request," GitHub explains on its website.

But that goes beyond what the US rules require. The US Treasury FAQs on Iran sanctions cover a similar scenario and note that it's not necessary to restrict the bank account of a client visiting a relative in Iran.

A stack of Oreo cookies

GitHub will no longer present a cookie notification banner – because it's scrapping non-essential cookies


After Slomski reiterated his complaint via Twitter over the weekend, GitHub CEO Nat Friedman joined the discussion thread and promised to look into the situation.

Not only did Friedman help restore Pure Labs' GitHub account but he published a blog post on Tuesday announcing that GitHub, after lengthy negotiations with Uncle Sam, has obtained a license to provide service to developers in Iran, for individuals and organizations, public and private, whether the accounts are free or paid.

"We took our case to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), part of the US Treasury Department, and began a lengthy and intensive process of advocating for broad and open access to GitHub in sanctioned countries," explained Friedman.

"Over the course of two years, we were able to demonstrate how developer use of GitHub advances human progress, international communication, and the enduring US foreign policy of promoting free speech and the free flow of information."

GitHub, said Friedman, is in the process of rolling back trade rule compliance measures it put in place in 2019 and restoring access to accounts blocked due to trade rules. The Register understands that the timing of the announcement and Pure Labs' predicament were purely coincidental.

This gives GitHub an advantage, for the moment at least, over competitor GitLab, which isn't available in Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria due to trade restrictions. According to Friedman, GitHub is talking to US government officials about securing licenses for developers in Crimea and Syria.

Despite the happy ending, Pure Labs' week of downtime is a reminder that relying on third-party services creates a potential business process vulnerability. The cloud is all light and air until you hit a wall. ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022