Xiaomi hit by US sanctions: Can't list on stock exchanges and investors can't invest

Parting shot by Trump – but 'bi-partisan' push against China will continue, says analyst

With five days left before the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, the Trump administration has delivered a parting blow to China's tech industry by designating Xiaomi as a "Communist Chinese military company" and placing it on a financial ban list.

Xiaomi now finds itself in the same boat as China's three largest telecoms giants. Namely, it cannot list on a US exchange, and US investors are legally prohibited from dealing in securities issued by the business.

In reality, the sanctions shouldn't cause too much immediate hassle to the smartphone maker, which is solely listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (SEHK). Nonetheless, word of the boycott sent the company's share price tumbling by more than 10 per cent to HK$29.30, compared to the previous day's close of HK$32.65.

The main impact will likely be felt later down the line, should Xiaomi attempt to raise capital by issuing new shares or notes. Since Xiaomi's debut in 2010, it has broadened its device portfolio from affordable, decent spec phones to include IoT devices, online services, and computers. Parallel to this, Xiaomi has attempted to crack the European market, inking deals with carriers and launching online and retail storefronts.

This expansion strategy has been built upon a vast moat of debt and equity funding, and Xiaomi has raised $7.4bn across 15 rounds since its inception, according to CrunchBase. The most recent was in early December, when it raised $3.955bn in a mixed debt/equity round. Future rounds may prove harder should it remain cut off from US investors.

Still, Xiaomi will thank its lucky stars it didn't receive the full Entity List treatment meted out to Huawei in 2019, which devastated the firm's supply chain and transformed a once-mighty mobile giant into a shadow of its former self. Analysts expect Huawei will drop out of the top-six mobile vendors this year, with Xiaomi taking its third place position in the leader board.

The Register has asked Xiaomi for comment. At the time of writing, we have not heard back but a statement published by the company on its official Twitter page denies any affiliation to the Chinese military, and says it complies with the law in all jurisdictions it operates.

Ironically, Trump's Department of Commerce helped facilitate a deal between Qualcomm and Xiaomi in 2017 as part of Sino-American trade, which saw the mobile giant agree to buy an unspecified number of semiconductors over the following three years. The deal was hailed in both a press release and official documents [PDF] issued by the department.

Ben Wood, mobile analyst at CCS Insight, was not surprised by today's embargo. "Last year we predicted that the US administration would play 'whack-a-mole' with Chinese tech companies once it had neutered Huawei's global ambitions," he said.

As the world's third largest mobile vendor by volume, Xiaomi presents a tempting target for a US government eager to constrain China's tech sector.

Wood doesn't expect the Biden administration to reverse Trump's antagonistic approach. "The big question now is whether the new administration will continue with the same strategy. At present, our current view is that the US versus China 'technological cold war' is a bi-partisan issue, so sanctions will continue, but may be slightly more measured," he told El Reg. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022