European Commission redacts AstraZeneca vaccine contract – but forgets to wipe the bookmarks tab

Open that little box and bingo, clear text of the whole PDF

Exclusive The European Commission's war of words against pharma company AstraZeneca over COVID-19 virus vaccines has descended into farce after Brussels accidentally published an unredacted version of a disputed supply contract.

The classic tech blunder saw commercially sensitive details freely published online – and readable by anyone who knows what Adobe Reader's Bookmarks tab is.

Although the main text of the contract had been heavily redacted in places, nobody thought to check the bookmarks tab had also been redacted before dumping the contract online as a PDF.

A non-redacted section of the contract states: "The Receiving Party shall treat all Confidential Information as secret and confidential and shall not use, copy or disclose to any third party any Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party."

It adds that the Receiving Party (ie, the EU) shall "ensure the protection of confidential information or documents with the same level of protection as its own confidential information or documents and in any case with due diligence."

The BBC published a summary of EU press officers' talking points about AstraZeneca, also reporting: "The EU has also demanded the company divert vaccines made at its UK production sites to boost the supply to the EU," adding that the EU hasn't yet paid AstraZeneca in full.

Redaction FAIL: Dull nuke sub document revealed in full


The contract itself was published as part of a EU political strategy focused on obtaining vaccine doses at the expense of the UK by applying pressure to AstraZeneca – the bloc is way behind schedule in deliveries because of the way it spread its bets among vaccine makers in its purchasing strategy back in 2020.

EU officials claim that the bloc is legally entitled, under the contract, to take possession of all AstraZeneca vaccine doses being produced on the Continent. Some current production is focused on meeting a contract for the UK placed months before the EU's.

Bloc leaders have asserted that by fulfilling the UK's order ahead of theirs, AstraZeneca was in breach of its EU contract: hence the EU Commission's decision to publish the contract, in the hopes of ramping up pressure on the British-Swedish pharmaceutical goliath.

The EU has said it paid €336m for guaranteed orders, and is upset the company is delivering elsewhere while its vaccine centres sit empty.

Regardless of the contract's terms not obviously supporting the EU position, the easily avoidable redaction blunder is unlikely to enhance the EU's negotiating position.

Relax, there's no obvious smoking gun here

Redacted details, visible in the bookmark view of the document, include the fact that the EU will pay AstraZeneca a third of its €336m upfront costs for the initial 300 million doses within 30 days of signing the contract, which was dated 27 August 2020.

EU member states are responsible for paying fill, finish and packaging costs of the vaccines as well as linked costs.

Should the cost of producing the EU's "initial Europe doses" exceed the €870m set aside for doing so, AstraZeneca is entitled to recharge the excess back to the EU. If the cost is substantially less than that, it appears the pharma firm must reimburse the EU with the difference.

Neither AstraZeneca nor the EU Commission responded to requests for comment, though by the time of publication red-faced EU officials had replaced the PDF file with one that had all of its bookmarks removed. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022