Ever wanted to own a piece of the internet? Now you can: $1 for a whole gTLD... or $2.8m if you want a decent one

Uniregistry announces auction of 20+ dot-words with no minimum for some

Anyone will be able to bid for a piece of the internet’s domain-name landscape this April – and for just $1 you could bag one of the more unpopular parts.

If you can spare just a few more dollars, you could snap up .audio, .game, .photo, .tattoo or 19 other common words, and go into business selling domains ending in those dot-words. We're talking $400,000 for .audio and $2.8m for .game, for instance, though.

At the lower end, there is no minimum price for the .hiv and .juegos registries: bid a buck, and with no better offers, they would be yours. There are 23 registries up for auction, with starting prices of, to pick a few, $100,000 for .hiphop, $125,000 for .christmas, $500,000 for .property, and $2m for .link. Some of them have a minimum price around about or not much more than application fees to secure them.

These generic top-level domains (gTLDs) are right now owned by registry operator Uniregistry, and its fire-sale is just the latest step in a restructure and asset sale of the company. It sold several of its other registries to a rival last year and then its domain-selling business to GoDaddy. After the auction, to be held on April 28, the company will focus on back-end services and hopes that at least some of the gTLDs it auctions off will choose Uniregistry for support.

It’s hard not to see the sale as a sign that the dream of a vast new market in new internet addresses is officially dead. Despite being around for nearly a decade now, uptake of the new TLDs – of which over 1,000 were approved in short order by DNS overseer ICANN – has been far below expectations.

Pretty woman looks miffed. Copyright: Danil Nevsky via Shutterstock http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=149618984&src=id

Men are officially the worst… top-level domain


The registry .hiv, for example, has just 315 names, compared to 10 million .org domains and hundreds of millions of dot-coms. Of those 315, more than a third are held by companies simply protecting their brand names, and another fifth is held by the registry as reserved names.

The most valuable registry being offered is .game, for which Uniregistry has set the minimum bid of just shy of $3m. You would imagine given that the video game industry brings in north of $100bn in annual revenues that controlling any internet address ending in .game would be worth far more than that, though there are currently only 2,270 .game domain names.

The same pattern is true for the other names on offer: .audio with a start bid of $400,000 and 4,730 names; .diet: start bid $175,000, 1,478 names; .lol: start bid $450,000, 11,781 names; and so on.

And don't forget: if you acquire one of these gTLDs, you have to pay ICANN any applicable annual fees – $6,250 a quarter and potentially transaction costs, typically – as well as other costs to actually run the dot-word's registry.

What happened?

There are a multitude of reasons why the expected boom in new internet addresses endings never happened, not least of which is the fact that awareness of the program never got much further than the domain name industry. This resulted in several companies buying up dot-word domains largely in the hope of later selling them with a massive mark-up once everyone else woke up to the rush.

But with so many domains flooding an uncertain market all at once, and with most of those names held by companies who were more interested in finding future buyers than building up a business, the whole enterprise fell flat. Eight years on, .com remains king.

Organizations also purchased their own corporate names as gTLDs in large part to protect their name. These “brand TLDs” were, it was hoped, going to allow the internet to develop in a radically new direction. It never happened, though, and many of those companies are actually abandoning their namesake registries altogether, handing them back to ICANN rather than pay annual maintenance fees.

Just this month, Nationwide Mutual Insurance – a $50bn business – informed ICANN it wanted to cancel the two gTLDs it had applied for. The first was its name - .nationwide. The second is indicative of the high hopes that many had for the expansion of the internet’s namespace, the company’s slogan in TLD form: .onyourside.

Together they are the 87th and 88th dot-brand cancellations, according to industry publication DomainIncite.

That’s not to say the gTLD revolution is dead; it may simply have been mismanaged. It’s not hard to imagine how, in the era podcasts and streaming music, that the .audio internet registry could not be turn into a hugely profitable business given the right focus, effort and marketing. Likewise, .mom or .pics or .flowers.

Master of your domain

The usefulness of domain names has slumped as huge tech companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Amazon have pulled the majority of the billions of internet users into their specific corners of the internet that each have a single encompassing domain: facebook.com, netflix.com, google.com, amazon.com, and so on. And operating systems like Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS have used apps to keep people within their walled gardens rather than let them run wild on the broader internet whose addressing system is still alive and well if under-utilized.

With increasingly antipathy toward those tech giants and antitrust actions expected to focus on installing greater competition into the online world, in a few years it’s possible to see the domain name system regaining some of its earlier popularity, at which point the lackluster gTLD market could take off again.

No one is holding their breath. The domain name industry became aware of Unregistry’s gTLD fire sale a week ago and the reaction has been tepid at best. That's reflected in the fact that Uniregistry has actually reduced the minimum start bid for every one of its gTLDs this week; it initially wanted $3.5m for .game, now it’s $2.8m. The price for another, .hosting, has been slashed in half: $1m to $500,000.

And yet, it still seems cheap for a fundamental piece of the internet’s landscape. Optimists with deep pockets need only apply. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Twitter founder Dorsey beats hasty retweet from the board
    As shareholders sue the social network amid Elon Musk's takeover scramble

    Twitter has officially entered the post-Dorsey age: its founder and two-time CEO's board term expired Wednesday, marking the first time the social media company hasn't had him around in some capacity.

    Jack Dorsey announced his resignation as Twitter chief exec in November 2021, and passed the baton to Parag Agrawal while remaining on the board. Now that board term has ended, and Dorsey has stepped down as expected. Agrawal has taken Dorsey's board seat; Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor has assumed the role of Twitter's board chair. 

    In his resignation announcement, Dorsey – who co-founded and is CEO of Block (formerly Square) – said having founders leading the companies they created can be severely limiting for an organization and can serve as a single point of failure. "I believe it's critical a company can stand on its own, free of its founder's influence or direction," Dorsey said. He didn't respond to a request for further comment today. 

    Continue reading
  • Snowflake stock drops as some top customers cut usage
    You might say its valuation is melting away

    IPO darling Snowflake's share price took a beating in an already bearish market for tech stocks after filing weaker than expected financial guidance amid a slowdown in orders from some of its largest customers.

    For its first quarter of fiscal 2023, ended April 30, Snowflake's revenue grew 85 percent year-on-year to $422.4 million. The company made an operating loss of $188.8 million, albeit down from $205.6 million a year ago.

    Although surpassing revenue expectations, the cloud-based data warehousing business saw its valuation tumble 16 percent in extended trading on Wednesday. Its stock price dived from $133 apiece to $117 in after-hours trading, and today is cruising back at $127. That stumble arrived amid a general tech stock sell-off some observers said was overdue.

    Continue reading
  • Amazon investors nuke proposed ethics overhaul and say yes to $212m CEO pay
    Workplace safety, labor organizing, sustainability and, um, wage 'fairness' all struck down in vote

    Amazon CEO Andy Jassy's first shareholder meeting was a rousing success for Amazon leadership and Jassy's bank account. But for activist investors intent on making Amazon more open and transparent, it was nothing short of a disaster.

    While actual voting results haven't been released yet, Amazon general counsel David Zapolsky told Reuters that stock owners voted down fifteen shareholder resolutions addressing topics including workplace safety, labor organizing, sustainability, and pay fairness. Amazon's board recommended voting no on all of the proposals.

    Jassy and the board scored additional victories in the form of shareholder approval for board appointments, executive compensation and a 20-for-1 stock split. Jassy's executive compensation package, which is tied to Amazon stock price and mostly delivered as stock awards over a multi-year period, was $212 million in 2021. 

    Continue reading
  • Confirmed: Broadcom, VMware agree to $61b merger
    Unless anyone out there can make a better offer. Oh, Elon?

    Broadcom has confirmed it intends to acquire VMware in a deal that looks set to be worth $61 billion, if it goes ahead: the agreement provides for a “go-shop” provision under which the virtualization giant may solicit alternative offers.

    Rumors of the proposed merger emerged earlier this week, amid much speculation, but neither of the companies was prepared to comment on the deal before today, when it was disclosed that the boards of directors of both organizations have unanimously approved the agreement.

    Michael Dell and Silver Lake investors, which own just over half of the outstanding shares in VMware between both, have apparently signed support agreements to vote in favor of the transaction, so long as the VMware board continues to recommend the proposed transaction with chip designer Broadcom.

    Continue reading
  • Perl Steering Council lays out a backwards compatible future for Perl 7
    Sensibly written code only, please. Plus: what all those 'heated discussions' were about

    The much-anticipated Perl 7 continues to twinkle in the distance although the final release of 5.36.0 is "just around the corner", according to the Perl Steering Council.

    Well into its fourth decade, the fortunes of Perl have ebbed and flowed over the years. Things came to a head last year, with the departure of former "pumpking" Sawyer X, following what he described as community "hostility."

    Part of the issue stemmed from the planned version 7 release, a key element of which, according to a post by the steering council "was to significantly reduce the boilerplate needed at the top of your code, by enabling a lot of widely used modules / pragmas."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022