Pyrrhic victory: Co-Op wins £13m from IBM over collapse of £175m Project Cobalt insurance platform contract

It wanted £128m in wasted spending – but customer wasn't blameless for debacle, rules UK High Court


Co-Op Insurance has successfully sued IBM for £13m in England over a £175m Agile software platform contract which collapsed in 2017 after a litany of failures by Big Blue and its subcontractor 1insurer.

High Court trial judge Mrs Justice O'Farrell ruled that both IBM and Co-Op had contributed to the project's collapse, though IBM was the ultimate loser of the case. IBM was ordered to pay the British insurer £13m in damages for the collapse of Project Cobalt.

This was a small sum compared to Co-Op's original claim against IBM for £128m in wasted project costs.

"In my judgment IBM was responsible for the critical delays to the project," said judge Mrs Justice O'Farrell, adding that the ultimate cause of the delays was an IBM subcontractor having "inadequate resources to perform the Release 1 customisation and configuration work identified in the fit-gaps."

IBM was responsible for the critical delays to the project

Commenced in June 2015, IBM's contract was to build Co-Op a new software platform to manage all of its insurance and underwriting business. The contract collapsed in July 2017 after Co-Op withheld a payment, claiming IBM subcontractor 1insurer (then known as the Innovation Group, or IG) had screwed it up so badly the platform was unfit for purpose.

1insurer had offered IBM a white-label insurance platform, which Co-Op alleged during the trial was built for the US market and couldn't be easily ported across to the UK's regulatory requirements.

The trial saw several colourful moments, including Co-Op chief exec Mark Summerfield describing the platform as "terrible", a senior IBMer being accused of telling porky pies* in the witness box, and an IBM VP partially blaming Sopra Steria for Project Cobalt's collapse. Sopra Steria carried out a £1m data migration, which was the sum total of its involvement in Project Cobalt.

Summerfield was also responsible for withholding a critical purchase order number from IBM, a decision which ultimately triggered the collapse of Project Cobalt. The judge ruled: "IBM was entitled to the purchase order for the AG5 milestone because payment was not conditional on progress of the project."

Despite IG and IBM's failures, however, Co-op failed to establish that if IBM had been more forthcoming about the delays, that would have led to the contract being cancelled earlier – thereby saving several million in wasted costs.

Co-Op would have been awarded £15.8m but for IBM proving that a Co-Op payment for a scheduled invoice was wrongly withheld, earning Big Blue a £2.8m "set-off" on the damages payout.

The Rolls Building, home of the High Court's Chancery Division

UK insurance biz Direct Line drops 'misrepresentation' claims against IBM in £36m database platform lawsuit

READ MORE

A spokesman for the Co-Op Group told us: "We can confirm that our former insurance subsidiary CIS General Insurance Limited (CISGIL)** has won its claim against IBM for breach of a major IT supply contract. The Court found that IBM unlawfully terminated its contract with CISGIL, was responsible for critical delays to the project, and failed to accurately report delays through to CISGIL in a timely manner."

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Big Blue said: "IBM is pleased to conclude this dispute, in circumstances where CISGIL wanted to bring the project to an end. IBM is also pleased that the judgment reduced CISGIL's inflated damages claim to a fraction of what was claimed recognising the contractual allocation of risks."

Who pays the legal costs of the case has not yet been decided. These won't be cheap; the case was first filed in 2018 and involved three QCs, three barristers, and countless solicitors from each side. That sort of legal representation usually costs several million pounds. ®

Bootnotes

* On that disputed topic of witness credibility, Mrs Justice O'Farrell said: "I reject the general attacks on the honesty and integrity of the witnesses. It is clear that they formed their own views on certain key issues of rights, responsibilities, and blame for the failure of the project... It does not follow that the whole of their evidence is inaccurate or unreliable."

It is routine for civil court litigants to claim that the other side's witnesses are all scheming liars, bumbling and forgetful incompetents, or some combination thereof. The hyperbole rarely cuts through with judges.

** In December CISGIL was sold to a firm called Soteria.

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • IBM AI boat to commemorate historic US Mayflower voyage finally lands… in Canada
    Nearly two years late and in the wrong country, we welcome our robot overlords

    IBM's self-sailing Mayflower Autonomous Ship (MAS) has finally crossed the Atlantic albeit more than a year and a half later than planned. Still, congratulations to the team.

    That said, MAS missed its target. Instead of arriving in Massachusetts – the US state home to Plymouth Rock where the 17th-century Mayflower landed – the latest in a long list of technical difficulties forced MAS to limp to Halifax in Nova Scotia, Canada. The 2,700-mile (4,400km) journey from Plymouth, UK, came to an end on Sunday.

    The 50ft (15m) trimaran is powered by solar energy, with diesel backup, and said to be able to reach a speed of 10 knots (18.5km/h or 11.5mph) using electric motors. This computer-controlled ship is steered by software that takes data in real time from six cameras and 50 sensors. This application was trained using IBM's PowerAI Vision technology and Power servers, we're told.

    Continue reading
  • IBM buys Randori to address multicloud security messes
    Big Blue joins the hot market for infosec investment

    RSA Conference IBM has expanded its extensive cybersecurity portfolio by acquiring Randori – a four-year-old startup that specializes in helping enterprises manage their attack surface by identifying and prioritizing their external-facing on-premises and cloud assets.

    Big Blue announced the Randori buy on the first day of the 2022 RSA Conference on Monday. Its plan is to give the computing behemoth's customers a tool to manage their security posture by looking at their infrastructure from a threat actor's point-of-view – a position IBM hopes will allow users to identify unseen weaknesses.

    IBM intends to integrate Randori's software with its QRadar extended detection and response (XDR) capabilities to provide real-time attack surface insights for tasks including threat hunting and incident response. That approach will reduce the quantity of manual work needed for monitoring new applications and to quickly address emerging threats, according to IBM.

    Continue reading
  • Compute responsibly: Yet another IT industry sustainability drive
    From greener datacenters to data transparency and 'conscious code', IBM, Dell, others push for better IT ops

    IBM and Dell are the founding members of a new initiative to promote sustainable development in IT by providing a framework of responsible corporate policies for organizations to follow.

    Responsible Computing is described as a membership consortium for technology organizations that aims to get members to sign up to responsible values in key areas relating to infrastructure, code development, and social impact. The program is also operating under the oversight of the Object Management Group.

    According to Object Management Group CEO Bill Hoffman, also the CEO of Responsible Computing, the new initiative aims to "shift thinking and, ultimately behavior" within the IT industry and therefore "bring about real change", based around a manifesto that lays out six domains the program has identified for responsible computing.

    Continue reading
  • IBM ordered to pay $1.6b to BMC
    Big Blue's 'routine eschewal of rules' justifies large penalty, judge says

    IBM has been ordered to pay Houston-based IT firm BMC $1.6 billion for fraud and contract violations because it moved mutual client AT&T from BMC software to IBM software.

    On Monday, US District Judge Gray Miller issued his final judgment [PDF] in the case, which began five years ago and culminated in a bench trial in March.

    For years, IBM had serviced AT&T's mainframe computers which at least since 2007 have relied on BMC software. IBM and BMC in 2008 entered into a contract governing the business relationship between the two companies. And in 2015, the two IT outfits agreed several amendments including an Outsourcing Attachment (OA) that disallowed IBM from moving mutual clients over to its own software.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022