IBM settles £36m Direct Line insurance platform project lawsuit, after claiming Teradata tried to usurp its spot

Terms of deal not disclosed as Big Blue insists it wasn't wrong, but merely didn't follow design standards


British insurer Direct Line has settled with IBM over a High Court case it brought against the firm for £36m in which it had alleged that Big Blue fatally bungled a far-reaching Agile methodology-based insurance platform IT project.

Direct Line’s 2014 Best for Customer (B4C) project (originally Project Emerald) was supposed to result in the business acquiring a new software platform on which to base its insurance operations. Instead, it alleged in court documents seen by The Register, that IBM cocked it up so badly the project had to be abandoned and restarted from scratch.

The case was settled on 11 February, according to court records reviewed by us. Terms of the settlement were confidential.

Direct Line wanted its B4C project to replace two existing mainframe-based systems: its Universal Insurance System and Visual Product Modelling System. The new setup was supposed to include an enterprise data warehouse (EDW) powered by Teradata's Database 14 product, as well as a workstream for migrating data from the old system to the new, which was titled Extract, Transform and Load (ETL) and powered by Informatica's PowerCentre suite.

None of this, according to Direct Line, went to plan. In filings made last October, Direct Line told the High Court:

IBM's work (which it had contemporaneously presented in the second half of 2015 as ready for Systems Integration Testing and therefore ostensibly fully designed and developed) contained extensive and material issues in both design and execution that should not have been present at that late stage of development. Its work was materially defective, not simply incomplete.

Further, when the EDW work became bogged down in delays, Direct Line said it told IBM to "assign resources to identify and resolve" lengthy ETL loading times – only to allege that IBM "had no one suitably qualified available."

Direct Line also accused IBM of "increasing complexity and the associated cost of ownership" by deviating from Teradata's Financial Services Logical Data Model (FSLDM) in the EDW's design: "IBM had been creating new entities where the FSLDM already contained appropriate structures. Moreover the model had been extended by copying and pasting in an undisciplined and undocumented way corrupting the design integration layer and making the EDW difficult to populate, maintain and understand."

For its part, IBM denied its FSLDM deviations were anything bad, telling the court in its defence filings that FSLDM was not "capable of being used by [Direct Line] without customisation" unless the insurer "was prepared to make significant changes to the way in which it stored and processed data."

IBM also made this statement in its defence:

It is denied that [Direct Line contractor] Bluesmith [Information Systems] expressed the opinion that IBM had failed to 'properly' observe Teradata database table design standards as alleged in sub-sub-paragraph 36(3)(h). Bluesmith merely noted that 'There are table design standards that have not been followed.'

' Teradata may have had a different view from that of IBM's experts'

IBM's lawyers also suggested that Big Blue techies knew Teradata's EDW product better than Teradata itself, telling the court: "That Teradata may have had a different view from that of IBM's experts as to how best to build the EDW did not and does not mean that IBM was wrong and/or in breach of any contractual obligation."

On top of that, they also claimed Teradata "had a vested interest in finding fault with IBM's work" because the database firm was hoping "to take over the development of the EDW from IBM."

Illustration of the UK flag, stock listings and a green arrow pointing up

Forget GameStop: Keyboard warriors and electronic trading have never mixed well

READ MORE

This may or may not have been a statement made by lawyers with 20:20 hindsight; in March 2016 Direct Line ordered IBM to hand over "all of the source code for the ETL and EDW undergoing development or component integration testing" and contracted Teradata to fix the EDW.

As for Direct Line, IBM said its erstwhile customer "was responsible for ensuring timeous provision to IBM of functional requirements, data requirements, data specifications, mapping rules and data extracts," adding that the insurer brought the project's collapse on itself as a result: "Many of the matters now alleged as a failure on the part of IBM to adhere to Good Industry Practice were a direct and inevitable consequence of a failure on the part of DLIS [Direct Line Insurance Services] to discharge such responsibilities adequately."

When asked for comment on the ending of the case, an IBM spokeswoman would only say: "The proceedings between DLIS and IBM have been settled on confidential terms."

Direct Line has yet to respond to The Register's request for comment.

The case is similar to one that went all the way to judgment recently, between IBM and Co-Op Insurance. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • IBM finally shutters Russian operations, lays off staff
    Axing workers under 40 must feel like a novel concept for Big Blue

    After freezing operations in Russia earlier this year, IBM has told employees it is ending all work in the country and has begun laying off staff. 

    A letter obtained by Reuters sent by IBM CEO Arvind Krishna to staff cites sanctions as one of the prime reasons for the decision to exit Russia. 

    "As the consequences of the war continue to mount and uncertainty about its long-term ramifications grows, we have now made the decision to carry out an orderly wind-down of IBM's business in Russia," Krishna said. 

    Continue reading
  • IBM AI boat to commemorate historic US Mayflower voyage finally lands… in Canada
    Nearly two years late and in the wrong country, we welcome our robot overlords

    IBM's self-sailing Mayflower Autonomous Ship (MAS) has finally crossed the Atlantic albeit more than a year and a half later than planned. Still, congratulations to the team.

    That said, MAS missed its target. Instead of arriving in Massachusetts – the US state home to Plymouth Rock where the 17th-century Mayflower landed – the latest in a long list of technical difficulties forced MAS to limp to Halifax in Nova Scotia, Canada. The 2,700-mile (4,400km) journey from Plymouth, UK, came to an end on Sunday.

    The 50ft (15m) trimaran is powered by solar energy, with diesel backup, and said to be able to reach a speed of 10 knots (18.5km/h or 11.5mph) using electric motors. This computer-controlled ship is steered by software that takes data in real time from six cameras and 50 sensors. This application was trained using IBM's PowerAI Vision technology and Power servers, we're told.

    Continue reading
  • IBM buys Randori to address multicloud security messes
    Big Blue joins the hot market for infosec investment

    RSA Conference IBM has expanded its extensive cybersecurity portfolio by acquiring Randori – a four-year-old startup that specializes in helping enterprises manage their attack surface by identifying and prioritizing their external-facing on-premises and cloud assets.

    Big Blue announced the Randori buy on the first day of the 2022 RSA Conference on Monday. Its plan is to give the computing behemoth's customers a tool to manage their security posture by looking at their infrastructure from a threat actor's point-of-view – a position IBM hopes will allow users to identify unseen weaknesses.

    IBM intends to integrate Randori's software with its QRadar extended detection and response (XDR) capabilities to provide real-time attack surface insights for tasks including threat hunting and incident response. That approach will reduce the quantity of manual work needed for monitoring new applications and to quickly address emerging threats, according to IBM.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022