Shelter for internet outcasts Parler slaps Amazon with fresh lawsuit after abandoning first attempt

Far-right sanctuary sues cloud giant for breach of contract after plug pulled on its server hosting

Updated Parler this week dropped its case against Amazon Web Services – and filed a fresh lawsuit claiming the cloud giant breached its contract by pulling the antisocial network's hosting.

The upstart biz, which describes its mobile app as a place for “free expression without violence and no censorship," is a favorite among America's far-right. It was used by those who coordinated and participated in the deadly attempted insurrection in the US capital on January 6. Days later, AWS suspended Parler's account, saying it could not provide services to an organization unable to remove content that encourages and incites violence. That breach of terms, as Amazon put it, led to the app falling off the internet.

Parler was also deplatformed by Twitter and Apple and Google’s software stores.

In an attempt to force Amazon to reinstate its account, and extract damages for its troubles, Parler filed a lawsuit against the cloud goliath in a federal district court in Seattle, Washington.

There, the tech conglomerate was accused of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act and breaking its contract with Parler by failing to give it 30 days of notice before booting it from the cloud. Amazon argued it was permitted to freeze the account on short notice due to the extreme content involved.

Now, Parler has withdrawn [PDF] from that seemingly losing battle. The court had denied its request for a preliminary injunction, which if successful would have forced AWS to host the social network. Parler is also back online now, anyway; it’s right now hosted by SkySilk Cloud Services in Los Angeles.

Someone holding a phone showing the Parler logo

Recovery time objective missed by four weeks, but Parler is back online


Yet the legal battle isn’t over. Parler has sued Amazon again, and this time it's at the King County Superior Court in Washington. The 66-page complaint [PDF] claims Amazon violated the Washington Consumer Protection Act, breached its contract with Parler, and also defamed the app maker as well as acted negligently.

Parler called Amazon a “bully" in its paperwork, and again demanded exemplary damages and its legal bills paid. “Many startup companies that have appeared to be a threat to Amazon and AWS have felt their wrath,” the filing stated. “Plaintiff Parler LLC is merely the latest casualty—a victim of Amazon’s efforts to destroy an up-and-coming technology company through deceptive, defamatory, anticompetitive, and bad faith conduct.

“Before the actions complained of here, Plaintiff Parler LLC had one of the hottest rising apps on the internet. A young start-up company that sought to disrupt the digital advertising and microblogging markets with a unique approach, Parler positioned itself as an alternative to the likes of Twitter or Facebook.

“But this rising popularity and alternative business model also made Parler a competitive threat to the likes of Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, and Google—four giants of the internet who derive enormous revenue from digital advertising. And that threat grew very real in late 2020 and early 2021 when Parler was poised to explode in growth. So together, Amazon, AWS, and others attempted to kill Parler."

Amazon has previously denied it colluded with Twitter to deplatform Twitter-esque Parler, and no hard evidence has been presented that it did so.

Spokespeople for Parler and AWS were not available for comment. ®

Updated to add

“There is no merit to these claims,” an AWS spokesperson told The Register after this article was published.

“AWS provides technology and services to customers across the political spectrum, and we respect Parler’s right to determine for itself what content it will allow.

"However, as shown by the evidence in Parler’s federal lawsuit, it was clear that there was significant content on Parler that encouraged and incited violence against others, which is a violation of our terms of service. Further, Parler was unable or unwilling to promptly identify and remove this content, which coupled with an increase in this type of dangerous violent content, led to our suspension of their services.”

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022